Woodland Hills, CA: $20.3M on 67,644 FEC receipts

67,644 lines carrying $20,284,164

The headline pair is $20,284,164 and 67,644 lines. The implied average is about $300. Cite both numbers. Quoting only the dollars drops the line-count shape of the Woodland Hills book. Los Angeles County filers typed Woodland Hills with state CA.

This page keeps the mixed-case city string Woodland Hills as stored on the extract, not a forced WOODLAND HILLS recode. It is a west San Fernando Valley neighborhood. LOS ANGELES is a different key. Tarzana and Calabasas are neighboring strings. The city total can include a PAC or joint-fundraising committee address when that is the city filers typed. LobbyVault does not recode those rows out of the city string. Read $20,284,164 as tagged federal receipts, not as what residents of Woodland Hills gave. The 67,644 lines are disclosed transactions, not unique persons.

If a newsroom map paints Woodland Hills together with Tarzana, Canoga Park, and Calabasas, the FEC file still splits them. This extract’s only city total is $20,284,164 on 67,644 Woodland Hills, CA rows, mean near $300. Keep the stored spelling Woodland Hills in the citation.

Why Woodland Hills on the receipt is not a census

Searchers often want “how much did people in Woodland Hills give.” The honest citation on this page is narrower: itemized federal receipts with contributor city Woodland Hills, CA total $20,284,164 across 67,644 contributions. Dropping “itemized” and “contributor city” inflates the claim. No. Woodland Hills, CA is the stored city field, mixed case as on the packet. LOS ANGELES is a different key when filers typed it.

Party is not in this packet. Do not attach a partisan reading to $20,284,164. Occupation and employer may appear on named receipts on the city hub; they are not rolled up here. A mean near $300 is arithmetic from the two packet facts, not a typical household gift.

Outside the Woodland Hills itemized book

$20,284,164 is not spending by Woodland Hills candidates. A candidate who lives in Woodland Hills can raise money from other cities. A donor row tagged Woodland Hills, CA can go to a committee anywhere. Unitemized federal gifts sit outside both packet facts.

Postal confusion with Tarzana, Canoga Park, and Calabasas is why the city field is a poor residency proxy. $20,284,164 counts rows that stored Woodland Hills, CA. 67,644 lines. About $300 each. Neighbor names need their own hubs. CA state-office receipts are omitted.

Woodland Hills versus Los Angeles on the FEC tape

Woodland Hills is a west Valley mixed-case neighborhood book. 67,644 lines produce $20,284,164, a mean near $300. That line count is not a unique-donor count. Comparing this mean to Los Angeles is only valid on the same series: contributor city, itemized federal receipts.

A Woodland Hills total of $20,284,164 does not absorb Tarzana, Canoga Park, and Calabasas. Those names are other city strings when filers typed them. State CA stays on the citation so Woodland Hills, CA is not merged with a same-named place elsewhere. Mixing in CA state-campaign data breaks the comparison.

City total versus postal codes in CA

67,644 city-field lines can spread across many ZIPs or cluster in a few. This packet does not list those ZIPs. Open the ZIP directory and the live Woodland Hills hub rather than guessing the split. After an amendment wave, recheck both the city hub and any ZIP you compared. Snapshots drift independently.

Because this packet carries only city, state, dollar total, and contribution count, every other story about Woodland Hills politics sits outside the extract. That includes candidate quality, issue fights, and local election results. This guide stays on the two numbers FEC.gov supplied for the city field: $20,284,164 and 67,644.

Source tables for $20,284,164

A mean of about $300 is division of $20,284,164 by 67,644. It is fair to report as arithmetic. It is not fair to report as a typical resident of Woodland Hills. Means move with a few large lines. Internal links on this page go only to the Woodland Hills city hub, the all-cities directory, and the ZIP directory.

Woodland Hills’s $20,284,164 across 67,644 contributions is a Los Angeles County city field, mean near $300. Tarzana is a neighboring string, not a subset. Los Angeles County is not summed here. Repeat gifts add rows. Cite $20,284,164 with 67,644 from FEC.gov aggregates indexed on LobbyVault. If the live hub disagrees with this snapshot, the newer FEC extract controls.

Questions

How much is itemized from contributor city Woodland Hills, CA?

FEC.gov itemized receipts listing contributor city Woodland Hills, CA total $20,284,164 across 67,644 contributions in the LobbyVault aggregate. That figure is a city-string roll-up of federal Schedule A rows, not a unique-donor count and not a census of people who live in Woodland Hills. Unitemized gifts sit outside it. The mean near $300 is arithmetic from those two packet facts.

Is Woodland Hills merged with Los Angeles on this page?

No. Woodland Hills, CA is the stored city field, mixed case as on the packet. LOS ANGELES is a different key when filers typed it. LobbyVault counts 67,644 itemized contributions for Woodland Hills, CA against $20,284,164. This packet does not publish a unique-donor figure, so 67,644 should not be quoted as a population. Original reports remain on FEC.gov.

Does the Woodland Hills total include only residents?

No. The city is the contributor-city value on the FEC itemization. Filers typed Woodland Hills with state CA. Office addresses and mail that list Woodland Hills can be part of $20,284,164 when that is the city string on the receipt. LobbyVault does not recode the field into a residential-only book. The 67,644-line count follows the same rule.

Are Woodland Hills numbers from FEC.gov?

The numbers come from FEC.gov itemized contribution aggregates indexed on LobbyVault: $20,284,164 and 67,644 lines for Woodland Hills, CA. Original reports remain on FEC.gov. Unitemized federal gifts and non-federal filings from CA are outside both figures. If a later extract disagrees with this snapshot, the Commission’s filing controls.