OVERLAND PARK, KS: $22.8M on 92,364 FEC receipts

92,364 lines behind $22,797,988

Overland Park shows 92,364 itemizations behind $22,797,988. That mix is a high-volume, smaller-average file. Many of the lines will be modest individual receipts that happen to share the Overland Park city field. Committee receipts that list an Overland Park address still sit in the same column. LobbyVault does not strip one type before adding the dollars.

Johnson County’s Overland Park string is separate from Kansas City, KS, Kansas City, MO, and Leawood on the FEC city key. Totals can include PAC and joint-fundraising addresses, not only residents. Read $22,797,988 as tagged federal receipts, not as what Overland Park residents gave. The 92,364 lines are disclosed transactions, not unique persons.

Nothing on this page estimates how Overland Park voted, which candidates the receipts supported, or whether a listed street is a home. Occupation and recipient committee live on other FEC fields. The supported path is the Overland Park city table, then ZIP pages, then the cities index.

Overland Park is not Kansas City on the FEC key

Committees type the city as it appears on the contributor record and the state as KS. A workplace in Overland Park and a home in Leawood can produce different city strings on different receipts. This hub holds only the 92,364 lines labeled OVERLAND PARK with state KS. That split is disclosure mechanics, not a statement about the Kansas City metro’s civic identity.

Keeping both facts in view—$22,797,988 and 92,364 contributions—shows a thick file. A combined Johnson County picture requires adding other hubs by design. Do not merge Kansas City, MO, into this Kansas string.

ZIP codes inside the Overland Park string

92,364 city-field lines can spread across many ZIPs or cluster in a few. This packet does not list those ZIPs. Open the ZIP directory and the live Overland Park hub rather than guessing the split.

After an amendment wave, recheck both the city hub and any ZIP you compared. Snapshots drift independently.

Kansas state campaign accounts are not inside $22,797,988. This hub is federal itemizations labeled OVERLAND PARK, KS: 92,364 records. A metro briefing that blends Kansas City, MO, is a different object unless those labels are added on purpose.

Overland Park’s volume shape

A mean near $247 on 92,364 rows is a volume shape: many itemized lines, smaller average receipt. Volume is not turnout and is not a unique-donor count.

High-dollar cities on this series can post similar dollar totals on far fewer rows. Overland Park’s $22,797,988 is not interchangeable with those books because the 92,364-line count is part of the claim.

Johnson County geography orients readers; this packet has no employer or industry split. Cite the city string and state KS, not the metro brand.

What this packet does not say about Overland Park

Party split, unique donors, and top committees are absent. If a briefing invents those figures for Overland Park, they did not come from this extract.

Independent expenditures that mention an Overland Park-area race can be paid by a committee with a different city on its own reports. Those disbursements do not move $22,797,988.

Citing OVERLAND PARK, KS from FEC.gov

A mean of about $247 is division of $22,797,988 by 92,364. It is fair to report as arithmetic. It is not fair to report as a typical resident of Overland Park.

Internal links on this page go only to the Overland Park city hub, the all-cities directory, and the ZIP directory. Those are the three paths that match this packet.

Overland Park’s $22,797,988 across 92,364 contributions is a high-volume Johnson County city field, mean near $247. Kansas City, MO, and Leawood are neighboring strings, not subsets. Repeat gifts add rows. Kansas state-office receipts are omitted. Cite $22,797,988 with 92,364 from FEC.gov aggregates indexed on LobbyVault.

Researchers citing Overland Park should keep Kansas City, Missouri, and Johnson County off the sentence unless they add those hubs on purpose. The live Overland Park table can show named committees that this snapshot does not list. A later FEC extract can move $22,797,988 or 92,364 without this guide rewriting itself. Treat the mean near $247 as division only. Kansas state-office receipts sit outside both packet facts. If a ZIP page for an Overland Park code disagrees with the city hub, quote both keys rather than forcing a match. Leawood and Kansas City, KS, remain other strings. The 92,364-line count still is not a headcount of Overland Park people.

Questions

How much federal campaign money is tied to Overland Park, KS?

FEC.gov itemized receipts listing contributor city OVERLAND PARK, KS total $22,797,988 across 92,364 contributions in the LobbyVault aggregate. That figure is a city-string roll-up of federal Schedule A rows, not a unique-donor count and not Kansas City, Missouri. Unitemized gifts sit outside it.

Is Overland Park merged with Kansas City on this page?

No. LobbyVault counts 92,364 itemized contributions for OVERLAND PARK, KS against $22,797,988, a mean near $247. Kansas City, MO, and Kansas City, KS, are different city strings. Repeat gifts, redesignations, and memo entries can add rows without adding new donors. A high line count with a modest mean is a volume book, not a turnout score.

Does the Overland Park total include only residents?

No. The city is the contributor-city value on the FEC itemization. Filers typed OVERLAND PARK with state KS. Office addresses and mail that list Overland Park can be part of $22,797,988 when that is the city string on the receipt. LobbyVault does not recode the field into a residential-only book. The 92,364-line count follows the same rule.

Are Overland Park numbers from FEC.gov?

The numbers come from FEC.gov itemized contribution aggregates indexed on LobbyVault: $22,797,988 and 92,364 lines for OVERLAND PARK, KS. Original reports remain on FEC.gov. Unitemized federal gifts and non-federal filings from KS are outside both figures. If a later extract disagrees with this snapshot, the Commission’s filing controls. The mean of about $247 is arithmetic from those two packet facts.