BEVERLY, MA: $19.7M on 17,629 FEC receipts

17,629 lines carrying $19,732,377

BEVERLY shows 17,629 itemizations behind $19,732,377. That mix is a thinner stack with a high average line relative to volume books that post similar dollars on 70,000-plus rows. The implied mean is about $1,119. Committee receipts that list a BEVERLY address still sit in the same column as individual rows.

BEVERLY, MA is a North Shore Essex County string, not Beverly Hills, California. State MA is required in the citation. This is a thin file: 17,629 lines against $19.7 million, a mean near $1,119. Salem is a neighboring key. The city total can include a PAC or joint-fundraising committee address when that is the city filers typed. LobbyVault does not recode those rows out of the city string. Read $19,732,377 as tagged federal receipts, not as what residents of BEVERLY gave. The 17,629 lines are disclosed transactions, not unique persons.

If a newsroom map paints BEVERLY together with Salem, Manchester-by-the-Sea, and Beverly Hills, the FEC file still splits them. This extract’s only city total is $19,732,377 on 17,629 BEVERLY, MA rows, mean near $1,119. Keep the stored spelling BEVERLY in the citation.

Why BEVERLY on the receipt is not a census

Searchers often want “how much did people in Beverly give.” The honest citation on this page is narrower: itemized federal receipts with contributor city BEVERLY, MA total $19,732,377 across 17,629 contributions. Dropping “itemized” and “contributor city” inflates the claim. No. This extract is BEVERLY with state MA. Beverly Hills, CA is a different FEC city-and-state key. The mean near $1,119 is arithmetic on 17,629 lines.

Party is not in this packet. Do not attach a partisan reading to $19,732,377. Occupation and employer may appear on named receipts on the city hub; they are not rolled up here. A mean near $1,119 is arithmetic from the two packet facts, not a typical household gift.

Outside the BEVERLY itemized book

$19,732,377 is not spending by BEVERLY candidates. A candidate who lives in BEVERLY can raise money from other cities. A donor row tagged BEVERLY, MA can go to a committee anywhere. Unitemized federal gifts sit outside both packet facts.

Postal confusion with Salem, Manchester-by-the-Sea, and Beverly Hills is why the city field is a poor residency proxy. $19,732,377 counts rows that stored BEVERLY, MA. 17,629 lines. About $1,119 each. Neighbor names need their own hubs. MA state-office receipts are omitted.

BEVERLY versus Boston on the FEC tape

BEVERLY is a thin high-mean North Shore book. 17,629 lines produce $19,732,377, a mean near $1,119. That line count is not a unique-donor count. Comparing this mean to Boston is only valid on the same series: contributor city, itemized federal receipts.

A BEVERLY total of $19,732,377 does not absorb Salem, Manchester-by-the-Sea, and Beverly Hills. Those names are other city strings when filers typed them. State MA stays on the citation so BEVERLY, MA is not merged with a same-named place elsewhere. Mixing in MA state-campaign data breaks the comparison.

City total versus postal codes in MA

17,629 city-field lines can spread across many ZIPs or cluster in a few. This packet does not list those ZIPs. Open the ZIP directory and the live BEVERLY hub rather than guessing the split. After an amendment wave, recheck both the city hub and any ZIP you compared. Snapshots drift independently.

Because this packet carries only city, state, dollar total, and contribution count, every other story about BEVERLY politics sits outside the extract. That includes candidate quality, issue fights, and local election results. This guide stays on the two numbers FEC.gov supplied for the city field: $19,732,377 and 17,629.

Source tables for $19,732,377

A mean of about $1,119 is division of $19,732,377 by 17,629. It is fair to report as arithmetic. It is not fair to report as a typical resident of BEVERLY. Means move with a few large lines. Internal links on this page go only to the BEVERLY city hub, the all-cities directory, and the ZIP directory.

BEVERLY’s $19,732,377 across 17,629 contributions is a Essex County city field, mean near $1,119. Salem is a neighboring string, not a subset. Essex County is not summed here. Repeat gifts add rows. Cite $19,732,377 with 17,629 from FEC.gov aggregates indexed on LobbyVault. If the live hub disagrees with this snapshot, the newer FEC extract controls.

Questions

How much is itemized from contributor city BEVERLY, MA?

FEC.gov itemized receipts listing contributor city BEVERLY, MA total $19,732,377 across 17,629 contributions in the LobbyVault aggregate. That figure is a city-string roll-up of federal Schedule A rows, not a unique-donor count and not a census of people who live in Beverly. Unitemized gifts sit outside it. The mean near $1,119 is arithmetic from those two packet facts.

Is this Beverly Hills?

No. This extract is BEVERLY with state MA. Beverly Hills, CA is a different FEC city-and-state key. The mean near $1,119 is arithmetic on 17,629 lines. LobbyVault counts 17,629 itemized contributions for BEVERLY, MA against $19,732,377. This packet does not publish a unique-donor figure, so 17,629 should not be quoted as a population. Original reports remain on FEC.gov.

Does the Beverly total include only residents?

No. The city is the contributor-city value on the FEC itemization. Filers typed BEVERLY with state MA. Office addresses and mail that list Beverly can be part of $19,732,377 when that is the city string on the receipt. LobbyVault does not recode the field into a residential-only book. The 17,629-line count follows the same rule.

Are Beverly numbers from FEC.gov?

The numbers come from FEC.gov itemized contribution aggregates indexed on LobbyVault: $19,732,377 and 17,629 lines for BEVERLY, MA. Original reports remain on FEC.gov. Unitemized federal gifts and non-federal filings from MA are outside both figures. If a later extract disagrees with this snapshot, the Commission’s filing controls.