ENGLEWOOD, NJ: $22.8M on 35,755 FEC receipts

35,755 lines carrying $22,835,837

Englewood shows 35,755 itemizations behind $22,835,837. That mix is a thinner stack with a high average line relative to volume books that post similar dollars on 80,000-plus rows. Committee receipts that list an Englewood address still sit in the same column as individual rows.

Bergen County’s Englewood string is separate from Teaneck, Englewood Cliffs, and Fort Lee on the FEC city key. Totals can include PAC and joint-fundraising addresses, not only residents. Read $22,835,837 as tagged federal receipts, not as what Englewood residents gave. The 35,755 lines are disclosed transactions, not unique persons.

A mean near $639 is the shape of this extract. It does not prove a typical gift. Named receipts on the Englewood FEC page are the next click for researchers who need committee labels.

Why ENGLEWOOD, NJ on the receipt is not a census

Searchers often want “how much did people in Englewood give.” The honest citation is narrower: itemized federal receipts with contributor city ENGLEWOOD, NJ total $22,835,837 across 35,755 contributions. Dropping “itemized” and “contributor city” inflates the claim, especially on a high-mean book.

Party is not in this packet. Do not attach a partisan reading to $22,835,837. Occupation and employer may appear on named receipts on the city hub; they are not rolled up here. State NJ is what keeps this page off Englewood, CO.

Outside the Englewood itemized book

$22,835,837 is not spending by Englewood candidates. A candidate who lives in Englewood can raise money from other cities. A donor row tagged ENGLEWOOD, NJ can go to a committee anywhere.

A mean near $639 does not describe a median resident of Englewood. Means move with a few large lines, and this packet’s line count leaves room for that effect.

Postal confusion with Teaneck, Englewood Cliffs, or Fort Lee is why the city field is a poor residency proxy. $22,835,837 counts rows that stored ENGLEWOOD, NJ. 35,755 lines. About $639 each. Neighbor names need their own hubs.

Englewood, NJ versus Englewood Cliffs

Englewood and Englewood Cliffs are neighboring names and separate FEC keys when filers typed them that way. This page is ENGLEWOOD, NJ only: 35,755 lines produce $22,835,837, a mean near $639.

Comparing Englewood’s mean to Fort Lee is only valid on the same series: contributor city, itemized federal receipts. Mixing in New Jersey state data breaks the comparison.

An Englewood total of $22,835,837 does not absorb Teaneck, Englewood Cliffs, or Fort Lee. Those names are other city strings when filers typed them. State NJ stays on the citation so ENGLEWOOD, NJ is not merged with Englewood, CO or Englewood, FL.

City total versus postal codes in NJ

35,755 city-field lines can spread across many ZIPs or cluster in a few. This packet does not list those ZIPs. Open the ZIP directory and the live Englewood hub rather than guessing the split.

After an amendment wave, recheck both the city hub and any ZIP you compared. Snapshots drift independently.

Because this packet carries only city, state, dollar total, and contribution count, every other story about Englewood politics sits outside the extract. That includes candidate quality, issue fights, and local election results. This guide stays on the two numbers FEC.gov supplied for the city field.

Source tables for $22,835,837

A mean of about $639 is division of $22,835,837 by 35,755. It is fair to report as arithmetic. It is not fair to report as a typical resident of Englewood.

Internal links on this page go only to the Englewood city hub, the all-cities directory, and the ZIP directory. Those are the three paths that match this packet.

Englewood’s $22,835,837 across 35,755 contributions is a Bergen County city field, mean near $639. Teaneck and Englewood Cliffs are neighboring strings, not subsets. Repeat gifts add rows. New Jersey state-office receipts are omitted. Cite $22,835,837 with 35,755 from FEC.gov aggregates indexed on LobbyVault.

Researchers citing Englewood, New Jersey, should keep Englewood Cliffs, Englewood, Colorado, and Fort Lee off the sentence unless they add those objects on purpose. The live Englewood table can show named committees that this snapshot does not list; on a 35,755-line book those names matter more than on a volume file. A later FEC extract can move $22,835,837 or 35,755 without this guide rewriting itself. Treat the mean near $639 as division only. New Jersey state-office receipts sit outside both packet facts. If a ZIP page for an Englewood code disagrees with the city hub, quote both keys rather than forcing a match. Teaneck remains another string. The 35,755-line count still is not a headcount of Englewood people.

Questions

How much is itemized from contributor city Englewood, NJ?

FEC.gov itemized receipts listing contributor city ENGLEWOOD, NJ total $22,835,837 across 35,755 contributions in the LobbyVault aggregate. That figure is a city-string roll-up of federal Schedule A rows, not a unique-donor count and not Englewood, Colorado. Unitemized gifts sit outside it.

Is this Englewood, New Jersey or Englewood, Colorado?

This extract is ENGLEWOOD with state NJ: 35,755 lines and $22,835,837, a mean near $639. Englewood, CO, would be a different city key. Englewood Cliffs is also a different string. This packet does not publish a unique-donor figure, so 35,755 should not be quoted as a population.

Does the Englewood total include only residents?

No. The city is the contributor-city value on the FEC itemization. Filers typed ENGLEWOOD with state NJ. Office addresses and mail that list Englewood can be part of $22,835,837 when that is the city string on the receipt. LobbyVault does not recode the field into a residential-only book. The 35,755-line count follows the same rule.

Are Englewood numbers from FEC.gov?

The numbers come from FEC.gov itemized contribution aggregates indexed on LobbyVault: $22,835,837 and 35,755 lines for ENGLEWOOD, NJ. Original reports remain on FEC.gov. Unitemized federal gifts and non-federal filings from NJ are outside both figures. If a later extract disagrees with this snapshot, the Commission’s filing controls. The mean of about $639 is arithmetic from those two packet facts.