BRIARCLIFF MANOR, NY: $16.1M on 24,374 FEC receipts

24,374 lines carrying $16,115,228

BRIARCLIFF MANOR shows 24,374 itemizations behind $16,115,228. That mix is a thinner stack with a higher average line than high-line city books that post similar dollars on far more rows. The implied mean is about $661. Committee receipts that list a BRIARCLIFF MANOR address still sit in the same column as individual rows.

Briarcliff Manor is a thinner Westchester village book: 24,374 lines against $16.1 million, a mean near $661. Ossining and Sleepy Hollow are neighboring keys. White Plains is a different Westchester city field. The city total can include a PAC or joint-fundraising committee address when that is the city filers typed. LobbyVault does not recode those rows out of the city string. Read $16,115,228 as tagged federal receipts, not as what residents of Briarcliff Manor gave. The 24,374 lines are disclosed transactions, not unique persons.

If a newsroom map paints Briarcliff Manor together with Ossining, Sleepy Hollow, and White Plains, the FEC file still splits them. This extract’s only city total is $16,115,228 on 24,374 BRIARCLIFF MANOR, NY rows, mean near $661. Keep the stored spelling BRIARCLIFF MANOR in the citation.

Why BRIARCLIFF MANOR on the receipt is not a census

Searchers often want “how much did people in Briarcliff Manor give.” The honest citation on this page is narrower: itemized federal receipts with contributor city BRIARCLIFF MANOR, NY total $16,115,228 across 24,374 contributions. Dropping “itemized” and “contributor city” inflates the claim. BRIARCLIFF MANOR, NY is the stored village string. White Plains is a different Westchester city key.

Party is not in this packet. Do not attach a partisan reading to $16,115,228. Occupation and employer may appear on named receipts on the city hub; they are not rolled up here. A mean near $661 is arithmetic from the two packet facts, not a typical household gift.

Outside the BRIARCLIFF MANOR itemized book

$16,115,228 is not spending by Briarcliff Manor candidates. A candidate who lives in Briarcliff Manor can raise money from other cities. A donor row tagged BRIARCLIFF MANOR, NY can go to a committee anywhere. Unitemized federal gifts sit outside both packet facts.

Postal confusion with Ossining, Sleepy Hollow, and White Plains is why the city field is a poor residency proxy. $16,115,228 counts rows that stored BRIARCLIFF MANOR, NY. 24,374 lines. About $661 each. Neighbor names need their own hubs. NY state-office receipts are omitted.

BRIARCLIFF MANOR versus White Plains on the FEC tape

BRIARCLIFF MANOR is a thinner Westchester village book in Westchester County north of New York City. 24,374 lines produce $16,115,228, a mean near $661. That line count is not a unique-donor count. Comparing this mean to White Plains is only valid on the same series: contributor city, itemized federal receipts.

A Briarcliff Manor total of $16,115,228 does not absorb Ossining, Sleepy Hollow, and White Plains. Those names are other city strings when filers typed them. State NY stays on the citation so BRIARCLIFF MANOR, NY is not merged with a same-named place elsewhere. Mixing in NY state-campaign data breaks the comparison.

City total versus postal codes in NY

24,374 city-field lines can spread across many ZIPs or cluster in a few. This packet does not list those ZIPs. Open the ZIP directory and the live Briarcliff Manor hub rather than guessing the split. After an amendment wave, recheck both the city hub and any ZIP you compared. Snapshots drift independently.

Because this packet carries only city, state, dollar total, and contribution count, every other story about Briarcliff Manor politics sits outside the extract. That includes candidate quality, issue fights, and local election results. This guide stays on the two numbers FEC.gov supplied for the city field: $16,115,228 and 24,374.

Source tables for $16,115,228

A mean of about $661 is division of $16,115,228 by 24,374. It is fair to report as arithmetic. It is not fair to report as a typical resident of Briarcliff Manor. Means move with a few large lines. Internal links on this page go only to the Briarcliff Manor city hub, the all-cities directory, and the ZIP directory.

Briarcliff Manor’s $16,115,228 across 24,374 contributions is a Westchester County city field, mean near $661. Ossining is a neighboring string, not a subset. Westchester County is not summed here. Repeat gifts add rows. Cite $16,115,228 with 24,374 from FEC.gov aggregates indexed on LobbyVault. If the live hub disagrees with this snapshot, the newer FEC extract controls.

Questions

How much is itemized from contributor city BRIARCLIFF MANOR, NY?

FEC.gov itemized receipts listing contributor city BRIARCLIFF MANOR, NY total $16,115,228 across 24,374 contributions in the LobbyVault aggregate. That figure is a city-string roll-up of federal Schedule A rows, not a unique-donor count and not a census of people who live in Briarcliff Manor. Unitemized gifts sit outside it. The mean near $661 is arithmetic from those two packet facts.

Is Briarcliff Manor counted inside White Plains on this page?

No. BRIARCLIFF MANOR, NY is the stored village string. White Plains is a different Westchester city key. LobbyVault counts 24,374 itemized contributions for BRIARCLIFF MANOR, NY against $16,115,228. This packet does not publish a unique-donor figure, so 24,374 should not be quoted as a population. Original reports remain on FEC.gov.

Does the Briarcliff Manor total include only residents?

No. The city is the contributor-city value on the FEC itemization. Filers typed BRIARCLIFF MANOR with state NY. Office addresses and mail that list Briarcliff Manor can be part of $16,115,228 when that is the city string on the receipt. LobbyVault does not recode the field into a residential-only book. The 24,374-line count follows the same rule.

Are Briarcliff Manor numbers from FEC.gov?

The numbers come from FEC.gov itemized contribution aggregates indexed on LobbyVault: $16,115,228 and 24,374 lines for BRIARCLIFF MANOR, NY. Original reports remain on FEC.gov. Unitemized federal gifts and non-federal filings from NY are outside both figures. If a later extract disagrees with this snapshot, the Commission’s filing controls.