Federal contributions from ZIP 10106

A 3,343-line file at $60,392,935

$60,392,935 divided by 3,343 is about $18,065 per itemized line. That mean is among the highest in this wave. It is still arithmetic, not a median, and not a typical Midtown household gift. The packet has no unique-donor field.

Three thousand three hundred forty-three itemizations cannot be read as a small-donor census. A short list at this dollar scale usually means large Schedule A rows—committee transfers, joint-fundraising allocations, or high-dollar itemizations—share the ZIP. This aggregate does not name those rows.

LobbyVault does not treat 10106 as a Rockefeller Center political score. Employer and recipient-committee fields sit elsewhere. This page stays on the two packet facts.

Midtown ZIP as a filing key, not a census tract

10106 is a five-digit contributor ZIP on FEC itemizations. Midtown Manhattan’s mail system includes box and committee addresses that are not household street files. If 10106 is what the filer put on Schedule A, the row enters $60,392,935. The accurate label is tagged federal receipts, not “what Midtown residents gave.”

The 3,343-line count still includes repeat itemizations and memo entries. A short list is not a unique-person count. This guide does not invent a headcount the packet omitted.

What never enters the 10106 total

Unitemized federal gifts are outside $60,392,935. New York State Board of Elections filings are outside it. Independent expenditures paid from another ZIP are outside it. Cite the figure only as the 10106 slice of FEC itemized receipts.

Concentration ZIPs move when a single large schedule is amended. Recheck the ZIP 10106 FEC page after a restatement rather than freezing $60,392,935. Compare extract dates before treating two published totals as a conflict.

Why dollars without lines mislead

Dollar rank without 3,343 lines would make 10106 look like any other $60 million ZIP. The line count is the tell: this is not a high-volume residential stream. The all-ZIP directory lets you place 10106 next to Manhattan codes with similar dollars and 100,000-plus receipts.

Do not convert that contrast into a claim about voter intensity in Midtown. FEC.gov does not measure intensity. It records itemized receipts tagged 10106.

Tables to open

The ZIP 10106 FEC page holds the live aggregate. The all-ZIP directory ranks other codes. The donor directory lists names on itemized receipts. Every printed dollar traces to FEC.gov via LobbyVault: $60,392,935, 3,343 contributions, ZIP 10106.

If a later extract disagrees, the Commission’s filing controls. Open named rows when an $18,065 mean makes you want identities rather than the roll-up.

Midtown’s $18,065 mean is not a household figure

ZIP 10106 totals $60,392,935 across 3,343 itemized FEC contributions. Midtown Manhattan mail—often a box or office code—on a few thousand lines is the filing-shape story. The mean of about $18,065 does not identify a committee, a candidate, or a person. It does not prove every row is large. The packet does not publish a breakdown. 3,343 is a contribution-line total, not a census of people who live in Midtown.

Box and committee addresses in 10106 are not a household street file. This guide uses that as orientation. Repeat itemizations and memo entries can still add rows on a short list. Without a unique-donor field, this page does not guess how many people sit behind $60,392,935. New York State Board of Elections filings never enter the total. Unitemized federal gifts never enter it. Independent expenditures paid from another ZIP never enter it.

Concentration ZIPs move when one large schedule is amended. Recheck the ZIP 10106 FEC page rather than freezing $60,392,935. The all-ZIP directory is the right place to set 3,343 lines next to Manhattan codes with similar dollars and 100,000-plus receipts. That contrast is filing shape, not voter intensity. FEC.gov does not measure intensity. Source: FEC.gov aggregates indexed on LobbyVault. Open named rows when an $18,065 mean makes you want identities rather than the roll-up.

Midtown’s 3,343 lines against $60,392,935 are a concentration pairing. The mean of about $18,065 is a ratio, not a household figure and not a named committee. New York State filings stay outside the total. Unitemized federal gifts stay outside it. Open the ZIP 10106 FEC page to see which rows sit behind the sum. Open the donor directory for names. Open the all-ZIP directory to set 3,343 next to Manhattan codes with 100,000-plus receipts and similar dollars. Recheck after a restatement; concentration ZIPs move when one schedule is amended. Source: FEC.gov aggregates indexed on LobbyVault.

Questions

How much federal campaign money is tied to ZIP 10106?

FEC.gov itemized receipts listing contributor ZIP 10106 total $60,392,935 across 3,343 contributions in the LobbyVault aggregate. That is a ZIP roll-up of federal Schedule A rows, not a unique-donor count and not a census of Midtown Manhattan residents. Unitemized gifts sit outside it. The mean of about $18,065 is arithmetic from those two packet facts.

Why are there only 3,343 contributions for $60,392,935?

LobbyVault counts 3,343 itemized contributions for ZIP 10106. That short list against $60,392,935 produces a high mean. Large Schedule A rows can dominate a Midtown concentration ZIP. The packet does not publish a unique-donor figure or a committee-versus-individual split. Read 3,343 as a line count, not a population.

Does ZIP 10106 include only people who live in Midtown Manhattan?

No. The ZIP is the five-digit contributor code on the FEC itemization. Box, office, and committee addresses filed as 10106 can be part of $60,392,935. LobbyVault does not recode the field into a residential-only book. The 3,343-line count follows the same rule. Open named receipts on the ZIP hub to see which committees appear.

Where does LobbyVault get ZIP 10106 totals?

The numbers come from FEC.gov itemized contribution aggregates indexed on LobbyVault: $60,392,935 and 3,343 lines for ZIP 10106. Original reports remain on FEC.gov. New York State filings are outside both figures. If a later extract disagrees, the Commission’s filing controls.