ZIP 10573: $44.6 million on 14,216 FEC receipts

Fourteen thousand lines, a $3,139 mean

$44,627,031 on 14,216 lines is a concentration pattern relative to ZIPs that carry similar dollars on 100,000 rows. A mean near $3,139 is a ratio, not a typical household gift. A Westchester mail ZIP can collect firm PACs, partnership addresses, and joint fundraising committees on the same five digits that also appear on individual Schedule A rows. FEC.gov does not label which of those categories produced the mean.

Fourteen thousand two hundred sixteen itemizations is enough volume to be a real filing stream and small enough that a few large transfers still dominate the mean. Do not read $3,139 as what a 10573 donor typically gives. The typical line is not in this packet. The mean is arithmetic. No party split is published on this ZIP total.

A mean near $3,139 on 14,216 lines is a high-mean pattern relative to volume ZIPs with similar dollars. It is not proof that people in 10573 give larger gifts. It is proof that the filed ZIP produced that pairing on FEC.gov.

The 10573 ZIP field versus a census

FEC contributor ZIPs are not geocoded to parcels. A committee that lists 10573 will post to this total if that is the ZIP on the form. Individuals who live elsewhere and use an office address can do the same. $44,627,031 is therefore not resident giving in 10573.

The 14,216-line count is an itemization count. Unique people are not totaled in this packet. Repeat gifts, reallocations, and memo items can inflate the line list without adding new contributors.

Researchers comparing 10573 to volume ZIPs with similar dollars should keep both packet facts in the same sentence. $44,627,031 without 14,216 hides whether the total is a long list or a short list. 14,216 without $44,627,031 hides scale. FEC.gov published both.

Boundaries of the $44,627,031 figure

Unitemized federal gifts are out. New York State-office campaigns are out. Independent expenditures by a committee filing a different ZIP are out even if the communication mentions a Westchester race. Cite $44,627,031 only as itemized federal receipts tagged 10573 on FEC.gov.

Joint-fundraising restatements can move this ZIP more than a high-volume residential code of similar dollars. After a major amendment, use the live ZIP 10573 FEC page rather than this snapshot.

Itemized-only scope still needs repeating. $44,627,031 never includes unitemized federal gifts and never includes New York State campaign money. Mixing those systems with this ZIP total leaves FEC.gov. This page stays on itemized receipts tagged 10573.

Comparing 10573 to other ZIP totals

The all-ZIP directory ranks the same FEC series. 10573’s mean is higher than many ZIPs that show more than 100,000 lines and a similar or smaller dollar total. That comparison describes filing shape. It does not describe who is more politically active. FEC.gov publishes receipts, not activity scores.

If you rank ZIPs by mean instead of by $44,627,031, 10573 jumps because 14,216 is smaller than volume peers. Ranking by mean is a derived view. State it as arithmetic from $44,627,031 and 14,216 so a reader can redo the division.

Cycle coverage in the underlying bulk files can span more than one election. This guide does not invent a cycle list because the packet does not include one. Treat $44,627,031 as the ZIP roll-up on the extract LobbyVault indexed, then confirm the live hub if you need a dated window.

How to cite ZIP 10573

The accurate citation is: itemized federal receipts with contributor ZIP 10573 total $44,627,031 across 14,216 contributions, according to FEC.gov aggregates indexed on LobbyVault. Shorthand such as this ZIP donated $44,627,031 drops the itemized-only limit. Keep that limit in the sentence at least once.

Open the ZIP 10573 FEC page for named receipts. Use the all-ZIP directory to compare other codes. Use the donor directory for names across ZIPs. If the live hub reprints a different $44,627,031 or 14,216, the newer FEC extract wins.

How to cite 10573 without inflating a neighborhood

The accurate sentence is: itemized federal receipts with contributor ZIP 10573 total $44,627,031 across 14,216 contributions, according to FEC.gov aggregates indexed on LobbyVault. Office addresses can share the same five digits as homes. The packet does not split them.

Unique donors are not in the packet. Party is not in the packet. Use the all-ZIP directory only to compare other codes on the same series. Use the donor directory for names. If the live hub reprints a different $44,627,031 or 14,216, the newer FEC extract wins.

Questions

How much federal campaign money is tied to ZIP 10573?

FEC.gov itemized receipts listing contributor ZIP 10573 total $44,627,031 across 14,216 contributions in the LobbyVault aggregate. That figure is a ZIP roll-up of federal Schedule A rows, not a unique-donor count. Unitemized gifts sit outside it. The mean of about $3,139 follows from dividing those two packet facts.

Why is the mean high for ZIP 10573?

14,216 itemized lines against $44,627,031 produces a mean near $3,139. That arithmetic is a scale check, not a typical household gift. Large committee and joint-fundraising receipts posted to a 10573 mail ZIP can dominate the mean. The packet has no median and no unique-donor count. Cite both $44,627,031 and 14,216.

Does ZIP 10573 include only residents?

No. The ZIP is the five-digit contributor code on the FEC itemization. PAC mail drops, joint fundraising committees, and office addresses can be part of $44,627,031 when 10573 is what was filed. LobbyVault does not recode the field into a residential-only book. The 14,216-line count follows the same rule.

Where does LobbyVault get ZIP 10573 totals?

The numbers come from FEC.gov itemized contribution aggregates indexed on LobbyVault: $44,627,031 and 14,216 lines for ZIP 10573. Original reports remain on FEC.gov. Unitemized federal gifts and non-federal filings are outside both figures. If a later extract disagrees with this snapshot, the Commission’s filing controls.