ZIP 89119: $48.9 million on 16,729 FEC receipts

High dollars on a shorter line list

$48,865,323 on 16,729 lines is a concentration pattern relative to ZIPs that carry similar dollars on 100,000 rows. A mean near $2,921 is a ratio, not a typical household gift. A commercial or airport-adjacent mail ZIP can collect firm PACs, partnership addresses, and joint fundraising committees on the same five digits that also appear on individual Schedule A rows. FEC.gov does not label which of those categories produced the mean.

Sixteen thousand seven hundred twenty-nine itemizations is enough volume to be a real filing stream and small enough that a few large transfers still dominate the mean. Do not read $2,921 as what a 89119 donor typically gives. The typical line is not in this packet. The mean is arithmetic. No party split is published on this ZIP total.

Commercial mail ZIPs often show fewer lines and a higher mean than residential volume ZIPs with similar dollars. 16,729 against $48,865,323 is that pattern. It is not proof that people in 89119 give larger gifts. It is proof that the filed ZIP produced that pairing on FEC.gov.

The 89119 ZIP field versus a census

FEC contributor ZIPs are not geocoded to parcels. A committee that lists 89119 will post to this total if that is the ZIP on the form. Individuals who live elsewhere and use an office address can do the same. $48,865,323 is therefore not resident giving in 89119.

The 16,729-line count is an itemization count. Unique people are not totaled in this packet. Repeat gifts, reallocations, and memo items can inflate the line list without adding new contributors.

Commercial mail ZIPs like 89119 are easy to misread as resident books. FEC.gov stored the ZIP that was filed. $48,865,323 across 16,729 lines is what that field sums to in this aggregate. A mean near $2,921 follows from division. Unique donors are not in the packet.

Boundaries of the $48,865,323 figure

Unitemized federal gifts are out. Nevada state-office campaigns are out. Independent expenditures by a committee filing a different ZIP are out even if the communication mentions a Las Vegas race. Cite $48,865,323 only as itemized federal receipts tagged 89119 on FEC.gov.

Joint-fundraising restatements can move this ZIP more than a high-volume residential code of similar dollars, because large committees can cluster on commercial mail codes. After a major amendment, use the live ZIP 89119 FEC page rather than this snapshot.

Itemized-only scope still needs repeating. $48,865,323 never includes unitemized federal gifts and never includes Nevada state-office money. Mixing those systems with this ZIP total leaves FEC.gov. This page stays on itemized receipts tagged 89119.

Comparing 89119 to other ZIP totals

The all-ZIP directory ranks the same FEC series. 89119’s mean is higher than many ZIPs that show more than 100,000 lines and a similar or smaller dollar total. That comparison describes filing shape. It does not describe who is more politically active. FEC.gov publishes receipts, not activity scores.

If you rank ZIPs by mean instead of by $48,865,323, 89119 jumps because 16,729 is smaller than volume peers. Ranking by mean is a derived view. State it as arithmetic from $48,865,323 and 16,729 so a reader can redo the division.

Cycle coverage in the underlying bulk files can span more than one election. This guide does not invent a cycle list because the packet does not include one. Treat $48,865,323 as the ZIP roll-up on the extract LobbyVault indexed, then confirm the live hub if you need a dated window.

How to cite ZIP 89119

The accurate citation is: itemized federal receipts with contributor ZIP 89119 total $48,865,323 across 16,729 contributions, according to FEC.gov aggregates indexed on LobbyVault. Shorthand such as this ZIP donated $48,865,323 drops the itemized-only limit. Keep that limit in the sentence at least once.

Open the ZIP 89119 FEC page for named receipts. Use the all-ZIP directory to compare other codes. Use the donor directory for names across ZIPs. If the live hub reprints a different $48,865,323 or 16,729, the newer FEC extract wins.

How to cite 89119 without inflating a neighborhood

The accurate sentence is: itemized federal receipts with contributor ZIP 89119 total $48,865,323 across 16,729 contributions, according to FEC.gov aggregates indexed on LobbyVault. A mean of about $2,921 follows from those two facts. It is not a median.

Unique donors are not in the packet. Party is not in the packet. Use the all-ZIP directory only to compare other codes on the same series. Use the donor directory for names. If the live hub reprints a different $48,865,323 or 16,729, the newer FEC extract wins.

Questions

How much federal campaign money is tied to ZIP 89119?

FEC.gov itemized receipts listing contributor ZIP 89119 total $48,865,323 across 16,729 contributions in the LobbyVault aggregate. That figure is a ZIP roll-up of federal Schedule A rows, not a unique-donor count. Unitemized gifts sit outside it. The mean of about $2,921 follows from dividing those two packet facts.

Why is the mean so high for ZIP 89119?

16,729 itemized lines against $48,865,323 produces a mean near $2,921. That arithmetic is a scale check, not a typical household gift. Large committee and joint-fundraising receipts posted to a 89119 mail ZIP can dominate the mean. The packet has no median and no unique-donor count. Cite both $48,865,323 and 16,729.

Does ZIP 89119 include only residents?

No. The ZIP is the five-digit contributor code on the FEC itemization. PAC mail drops, joint fundraising committees, and office addresses can be part of $48,865,323 when 89119 is what was filed. LobbyVault does not recode the field into a residential-only book. The 16,729-line count follows the same rule.

Where does LobbyVault get ZIP 89119 totals?

The numbers come from FEC.gov itemized contribution aggregates indexed on LobbyVault: $48,865,323 and 16,729 lines for ZIP 89119. Original reports remain on FEC.gov. Unitemized federal gifts and non-federal filings are outside both figures. If a later extract disagrees with this snapshot, the Commission’s filing controls.