Skip to main content
← All data ties

California × 2010: candidate receipts

FEC.gov records $146,494,431.09 in candidate receipts where office state is CA and cycle is 2010, on 198 candidate records. Nationally, cycle 2010 shows $1,854,998,616.07 from 2190 candidates. This URL is the intersection. It does not rank California as a winner or loser, and it does not treat receipts as public spending.

Key figures

  • $146,494,431.09 is the California × 2010 candidate-receipt join (198 records).
  • $1,854,998,616.07 is the national 2010 book; California is 7.9% of that book.
  • Office state CA is not donor geography.
  • Cycle 2010 is a midterm FEC window.
  • If the live hub disagrees, the newer FEC extract controls.

Reading $146,494,431.09 as a two-column match

LobbyVault keeps a California state page and a 2010 election-cycle page. Neither page is this join. The join is $146,494,431.09 from 198 candidates where cycle equals 2010 and office state equals CA. Against the national cycle total of $1,854,998,616.07 from 2190 candidates, that is 7.9% of dollars and 9.0% of candidate records. Other office states hold $1,708,504,184.98 and 1992 candidates.

Do not treat 7.9% as California's share of donor geography. Donor state is a different field. Do not treat 198 as unique residents. Repeat filings, primary-and-general committees, and special elections can add candidate records. The packet publishes the count as given.

Dollar figures are candidate receipt aggregates from FEC.gov, not federal awards and not state-office filings outside the FEC candidate file. This page is a cycle × office-state join, not a donor roster.

California without a national mix

On the state side, California indexes $146,494,431.09 of candidate-receipt dollars in 2010 from 198 records. Dollar share of the national cycle is 7.9%. Candidate-record share is 9.0% (198 of 2190). Those two shares need not match; they use different numerators and the same national file.

Keep state CA on the name. $146,494,431.09 is not a donor-state total. Open the California campaign-finance hub for other cycles; open this page for California in 2010 only.

2010 as a midterm FEC window

On the cycle side, 2190 national candidate records produced $1,854,998,616.07. California contributed 198 of those records and $146,494,431.09 of those dollars. Midterm versus the other even-year type is a schedule fact for 2010, not an explanation of the dollars.

Independent expenditures never enter $146,494,431.09. Committee operating expenditures never enter $146,494,431.09. This is a candidate-receipt cycle×state aggregate from FEC.gov. California state-office filings outside the FEC candidate system are a different statute.

Packet slug 2010-california-candidate-receipts is the LobbyVault filename for this 2010 × California join. Canonical path is /ties/2010-california-candidate-receipts/. Overlay the cycle hub and the state hub; do not treat either hub as $146,494,431.09.

Cycle 2010 (midterm) plus office state CA is the two-part key behind $146,494,431.09. Drop the cycle and the page becomes a multi-year state hub. Drop the state and the page becomes the national cycle hub of $1,854,998,616.07. Keep both.

7.9% of 2010 candidate-receipt dollars

Compared with the rest of cycle 2010, California is 7.9% of candidate-receipt dollars ($146,494,431.09 of $1,854,998,616.07) and 9.0% of candidate records (198 of 2190). The dollar rest is $1,708,504,184.98. Quote dollars and records as different columns.

Do not rank California as a winner or loser in 2010. This join has one office state and one cycle. Neighboring cycle-state pages are other keys.

Recompute the dollar share from the raw figures: 146,494,431.09 divided by 1,854,998,616.07 is 7.9%. The complement 1,708,504,184.98 is $1,708,504,184.98, which is 92.1% of the national 2010 book. Candidate share uses 198 / 2190.

FEC candidate receipts are not USAspending obligations. $146,494,431.09 has no award count beside it in this packet. Do not fold $146,494,431.09 into federal spending in California. Different statutes, different forms, different tables.

What $146,494,431.09 leaves out

Independent expenditures sit outside $146,494,431.09. California state-office filings that never enter the FEC candidate system sit outside it. Federal contract awards sit outside it. Office-state labels follow the candidate filing. Donor city is a different join.

Do not read $146,494,431.09 as proof that money decided California elections in 2010. The join is two fields. Correlation is not causation. If the live hubs disagree with $146,494,431.09, the newer FEC extract controls.

California campaign-finance coverage still includes every other cycle. This tie does not. Researchers who need a multi-year mix should leave this URL and open the California hub. Researchers who need California in 2010 should stay here.

Do not invent candidate names. 198 is a record count. Mean about $739,870.86 is arithmetic. The packet published cycle, state, $146,494,431.09, 198, $1,854,998,616.07, and 2190.

Internal links for the 2010 × California join

The four hrefs in the packet are the only URLs used here: the 2010 election cycle, California campaign finance, all election cycles, and all FEC ties. No other path is invented. Canonical path for this join is /ties/2010-california-candidate-receipts/.

Quote $146,494,431.09, 198, $1,854,998,616.07, 2190, 7.9%, and 9.0%. That set is complete relative to the packet. Extra dollars or extra names would be inventions.

Candidate receipts are the only money in $146,494,431.09 and $1,854,998,616.07. Independent expenditures and USAspending awards are other files. Mixing those files with this join would invent a total the packet does not contain.

Questions

How much did California candidates raise in 2010?
This extract records $146,494,431.09 in FEC candidate receipts where office state is CA and cycle is 2010, across 198 candidate records. That is the cycle-and-state join, not the national 2010 book of $1,854,998,616.07 from 2190 candidates. No candidate names are in the packet. Source: FEC.gov. Not independent expenditures.
Is office state the same as donor state for California in 2010?
No. Office state is the state of the office sought. Donor state is a different FEC field and is not this join. $146,494,431.09 can include itemized gifts from other states to California candidates. 198 candidate records follow the office-state filter only. Cite FEC.gov candidate receipts grouped by election cycle and office state.
What share of 2010 candidate receipts came from California offices?
$146,494,431.09 is 7.9% of the $1,854,998,616.07 national 2010 cycle book. 198 candidate records are 9.0% of 2190 nationally. Other office states account for $1,708,504,184.98. Quote dollars and counts separately. Do not upgrade 7.9% into a donor-geography share or a USAspending share.
Do California candidate receipts in 2010 fund federal grants there?
No. These figures are FEC candidate receipts, not USAspending awards. $146,494,431.09 does not become a contract or assistance award because both datasets can mention California. Different statutes, different forms. This packet has no obligation dollars and no award counts. Filings remain on FEC.gov.

FEC.gov candidate receipts grouped by election cycle and office state. Not independent expenditures. Not a claim about federal spending.