Actress occupation money in the 2010 FEC cycle

Actress as occupation, 2010 as cycle

Two keys define this page. One is the occupation string ACTRESS. The other is the 2010 federal election cycle. The match is $171,522, built from 120 contributions and 66 unique donors. Drop either key and the number changes. 2010 is a midterm FEC window. 120 contributions from 66 donors is closer to one-to-two itemized gifts per person inside this cycle filter, still not a headcount of the occupation.

The join is a filter pair, not a causal story. ACTRESS is the occupation string as entered. ACTOR and PERFORMER remain other keys. The join does not verify union status, credits, or that the filer worked on a production in the cycle. Stage, film, and television uses can share the typed word. This cell keeps ACTRESS and does not recode ACTOR or FILMMAKER into the bucket. Independent expenditures, unitemized gifts, and committee-to-committee transfers are outside $171,522. FEC individual receipts are not USAspending.gov awards; this page does not treat campaign gifts as federal spending.

2.0% of $8,674,475 is $171,522. That arithmetic uses only the occupation total and the cycle total in this packet. It is not a forecast and not a party split. Recipient committees may be anywhere; cycle is the FEC even-year window, not the donor’s state.

ACTRESS is not a sibling title

Actress donations is the occupation hub: $8,674,475 ($8.7 million) across cycles from filers who typed ACTRESS. Sibling strings (ACTOR, PERFORMER, and FILM ACTRESS) are not merged here. The occupation total is not an SAG-AFTRA membership roll, a credits database, or a guild PAC.

The 2010 cycle filter on Actress receipts

The 2010 election cycle hub holds itemized individual receipts for every occupation coded to that even-year window. This tie keeps only Actress. $171,522 is therefore not a cycle-wide total. FEC.gov labels this even-year federal window 2010. A midterm FEC window. It is not a 2008 presidential window and not a 2012 presidential cycle.

120 contributions from 66 donors is closer to one-to-two itemized gifts per person inside this cycle filter, still not a headcount of the occupation. About 1.8 itemized rows per donor is a filing ratio. Mean per receipt about $1,429; mean per donor about $2,599. Those means are arithmetic on the 2010 cell only. The packet has no median, no party split, and no employer table. Unitemized federal gifts never enter $171,522.

What the Actress–2010 join is not

Matching Actress with 2010 does not measure influence, does not assign party, and does not say Actress donors caused an electoral result. Correlation between an occupation string and a cycle is not causation. The table is also not an SAG-AFTRA membership roll, a credits database, or a guild PAC.

Itemized individual contributions from FEC.gov only. Independent expenditures, unitemized gifts, and state-office campaigns are excluded. Occupation labels are filer-entered. ACTRESS is the occupation string as entered. ACTOR and PERFORMER remain other keys. The join does not verify union status, credits, or that the filer worked on a production in the cycle. Campaign gifts and federal awards remain separate public records. This page does not claim that $171,522 funded USAspending obligations.

Linked Actress and 2010 tables

Actress donations holds the $8,674,475 occupation total. The 2010 election cycle page holds every occupation in that window, not only Actress. All occupations places ACTRESS beside other titles without merging sibling strings (ACTOR, PERFORMER, and FILM ACTRESS). All FEC ties lists other occupation-cycle pairs so $171,522 is not added to a different year.

Use the occupation hub for all-cycle Actress dollars ($8,674,475). Use the 2010 cycle hub for the even-year window across titles. Use this tie for the intersection only: $171,522, 120 contributions, 66 donors, 2.0% of occupation dollars. Those four internal links are the only hrefs this copy may use.

Actress 2010 as a dollar-share slice

2010 is a thin slice of Actress occupation dollars: 2.0% ($171,522 of $8,674,475). The occupation hub is much larger than this one cycle. $171,522 is the cycle extract, not a second occupation total. Do not add ACTOR dollars into $171,522.

Researchers who need employer text or recipient committees should leave this join and open the Actress donations table. The 2010 cycle page is the even-year inventory. FEC.gov remains the controlling filing if extracts diverge.

Questions

How much did Actress-labeled donors give in 2010?

The Actress grouping’s 2010 cell is $171,522 in itemized individual contributions, from 120 contributions and 66 donors, per FEC.gov aggregates. That is the occupation-cycle join, not a PAC total and not the $8,674,475 all-cycle occupation total.

Does Actress include people who typed Actor?

No. ACTRESS is the stored spelling. ACTOR is a separate occupation page. The 2010 cycle filter on Actress is $171,522, 120 contributions, and 66 donors. The occupation total across cycles is $8,674,475. Labels are filer-entered on FEC.gov itemized receipts.

What share of Actress FEC money fell in 2010?

About 2.0%. $171,522 divided by $8,674,475 is the 2010 cell’s share of the lifetime occupation bucket. Other cycles hold about 98.0% ($8,502,953) on the occupation hub. See the Actress occupation hub for other cycles and the 2010 cycle hub for other strings.

Does Actress 2010 money fund federal awards?

No. These figures are FEC individual contribution aggregates. Federal awards are published by USAspending. This page does not claim that campaign gifts funded those awards. $171,522 is itemized receipts tagged ACTRESS in 2010, not an obligation total. Occupation labels are filer-entered.