Actress contributions received by the DSCC

DSCC as one committee inside Actress

This cell is Actress money inside DSCC, not Actress money on every committee and not DSCC money from every employer. FEC.gov puts $515,679 at that crossing, from 14,856 itemized contributions. It is not an Actor hub, a SAG roster, or a film-tax-credit award.

Readers comparing hubs should remember the missing key. The Actress hub lacks C00042366. The committee hub lacks ACTRESS. This page has both, totaling $515,679.

ACTRESS is occupation text. Neighboring keys such as ACTOR are other pages. DSCC is C00042366. 14,856 itemized lines totaling $515,679 describe a high-volume, smaller-mean pattern. The packet does not publish a median and does not identify screen credits. Attorney at Law also has a DSCC join; that is a different occupation filter.

Occupation or employer field, not a payroll file

A payroll file would list current workers. This aggregate lists itemized contribution lines whose field grouped to ACTRESS. Retirees and household members can reuse the string. 14,856 lines are not an employee headcount.

14,856 lines at about $35 each is $515,679 divided by 14,856. That mean is arithmetic, not a typical gift, not a contribution limit, and not a unique-donor census. Unitemized gifts never enter $515,679.

Independent expenditures stay off $515,679

Independent expenditures by DSCC, if any, are a different FEC table. $515,679 is itemized individual receipts only. It is not a unique-performer census.

About 5.8% of $8,949,628 is this cell. The leftover $8,433,949 sits on other committees under the same ACTRESS grouping, or outside this recipient filter.

Share language for Actress × DSCC

ACTRESS across all committees is $8,949,628. ACTRESS at DSCC is $515,679 — about 5.8%. The gap is $8,433,949. Closing that gap would require other committee joins, which this packet does not list.

USAspending obligations that share a similar name, if any exist, are a different dataset. This join does not claim that $515,679 funded federal work. Campaign contributions are not federal awards. The cell is not an Actor hub, a SAG roster, or a film-tax-credit award.

Correlation is not a spending trail

A shared occupation or employer word and a shared committee are not a causal chain. $515,679 is the itemized-individual overlap. It is not proof that Actress as an organization directed the gifts. Cite $515,679, 14,856 contributions, $8,949,628 on the Actress grouping, and C00042366. Keep both sides named: ACTRESS as grouped text, DSCC as recipient.

Using the four internal links

Open /industries/actress/ for the Actress grouping of $8,949,628, /committees/C00042366/ for DSCC (C00042366) receipts from every employer, /industries/ for other industry hubs, and /ties/ for neighboring joins. Live overlay numbers win if they disagree with this snapshot.

Source: FEC.gov aggregates of itemized individual contributions grouped by employer/industry and recipient committee. Not independent expenditures. Restating the join: Actress at DSCC is $515,679 from 14,856 itemized individual contributions. Other committees hold $8,433,949 (94.2%). No donor names are in this packet.

Researchers who need names behind the 14,856 contribution lines must leave this prose page for the committee and industry tables. This tie only publishes the overlap: $515,679 coded to ACTRESS and received by DSCC (C00042366), against a grouping of $8,949,628. About 5.8% of that grouping is here; $8,433,949 is not. Dollars per line average about $35. An occupation label, not a studio payroll. The cell is not an Actor hub, a SAG roster, or a film-tax-credit award.

Four hrefs cover the join: /industries/actress/ (Actress), /committees/C00042366/ (The Actress × DSCC cell is $515,679. FEC.gov counted 14,856 itemized individual contributions into C00042366. That is the join, not the $8,949,628 all-committee grouping and not a corporate treasury gift.), /industries/ (No. ACTRESS here is an occupation label, not a studio payroll. 14,856 itemized lines produced $515,679 at DSCC. Employment status and corporate identity are not verified on this aggregate. Neighboring spellings are other keys.), and /ties/ (About 5.8%. $515,679 divided by $8,949,628 is the DSCC share for this exact string. $8,433,949 sits on other committees. No all-employer C00042366 denominator is in the packet.). Together they let a reader add or remove one filter at a time without leaving FEC itemized-individual space. This snapshot recorded $515,679 from 14,856 contributions. Live pages can move. FEC.gov is the originating filing system. Unitemized individual gifts never enter $515,679. Independent expenditures and PAC disbursements are other FEC tables. Sharing a company-like string does not merge those ledgers with C00042366.

Questions

How much did Actress-coded filers give DSCC?

The Actress × DSCC cell is $515,679. FEC.gov counted 14,856 itemized individual contributions into C00042366. That is the join, not the $8,949,628 all-committee grouping and not a corporate treasury gift. FEC.gov is the source for $515,679, 14,856 contributions, and committee C00042366.

Is Actress a company in this FEC table?

No. ACTRESS here is an occupation label, not a studio payroll. 14,856 itemized lines produced $515,679 at DSCC. Employment status and corporate identity are not verified on this aggregate. Neighboring spellings are other keys. FEC.gov is the source for $515,679, 14,856 contributions, and committee C00042366.

What share of Actress FEC money went to DSCC?

About 5.8%. $515,679 divided by $8,949,628 is the DSCC share for this exact string. $8,433,949 sits on other committees. No all-employer C00042366 denominator is in the packet. FEC.gov is the source for $515,679, 14,856 contributions, and committee C00042366.

Why does this join list 14,856 contributions?

14,856 is the contribution-line count for ACTRESS at DSCC. It is not a unique-donor census; that count is not in the packet. Mean line size is about $35. Open the committee hub for other employers. FEC.gov is the source for $515,679, 14,856 contributions, and committee C00042366.