Agnes Gund and the 2010 FEC election cycle
Donors listing Agnes Gund reported $288,342 in itemized individual contributions during the 2010 federal election cycle, according to FEC.gov aggregates. Those dollars arrived in 69 contributions from 1 donor. The grouping’s stored total across cycles is $5,954,136; the 2010 slice is about 4.8% of that running sum. The key is not a museum endowment and not a foundation 990.
Key figures
- Agnes Gund × 2010 is $288,342 in itemized individual contributions.
- The cell includes 69 contributions from 1 donor.
- 2010 is about 4.8% of the grouping’s $5,954,136 all-cycle total.
- The label is self-reported form text, not a museum endowment and not a foundation 990.
- FEC gifts and federal award files remain separate datasets.
Agnes Gund crossed with 2010
Employer groupings sit on one axis; election cycles sit on the other. Rows that match both — Agnes Gund and 2010 — sum to $288,342. 69 itemized contributions and 1 unique donor produced it. The total is not an official organization disbursement and does not name recipients. Independent expenditures and committee transfers live in other FEC tables. AGNES GUND is a personal name stored as an employer/industry grouping. The 2010 filter keeps receipts in that cycle whose field collapsed to this key. A one-donor cell usually means many committee destinations or memo entries, not 69 people.
Neither the Agnes Gund hub nor the 2010 election cycle hub is this number; each hub drops one of the two keys. The Agnes Gund hub is the year index for this string. Foundation legal names and other personal-name keys stay separate if filers used them. Federal arts awards on USAspending are a different file and are not funded by these itemized gifts.
4.8% of the Agnes Gund roll
The grouping’s stored total across cycles is $6.0 million ($5,954,136). The 2010 slice of $288,342 is about 4.8% of that running sum. Other even-year windows hold the remaining 95.2%. Treating 2010 as the Agnes Gund FEC story would ignore that remainder.
Treat $5,954,136 as the denominator for the 4.8% share. It is not market capitalization, not revenue, and not proof of a multi-year political program. The industry hub is the year index for this string. This tie keeps 2010 from being folded silently into $5,954,136.
69 contributions from 1 donor
Dividing $288,342 by 69 contributions yields about $4,179 per itemized gift. Dividing by 1 donor yields $288,342 per harvested donor. Contributions per donor average about 69.0. Those means describe the arithmetic on the packet. They are not medians and not a party split. One donor and 69 lines produced $288,342 in 2010.
1 unique donor is a contributor identity inside this industry-cycle cell, not a headcount of employees, licensees, or members. Repeat gifts, joint fundraising memo entries, and multiple committees raise the contribution count faster than the donor count. The overlay for Agnes Gund 2010 holds the rows.
2010 as the cycle dimension
The 2010 election cycle hub includes every stored employer for that window. Agnes Gund is one cell in that matrix. This packet does not publish a cycle-wide denominator, so no national share is stated. Open the 2010 election cycle to drop the employer filter and Agnes Gund to drop the year.
Gifts from both years of the two-year FEC window sit in the $288,342 cell because the cycle is a two-year tag, not a single Tuesday. That mechanical fact is easy to forget when a searcher wants an election-night number. The overlay is where dates become visible. This join publishes the cycle total, the 69 contributions, the 1 unique donor, and the 4.8% share of $5,954,136.
Limits of the Agnes Gund × 2010 join
Itemized individual receipts are the universe. Unitemized gifts, independent expenditures, and PAC disbursements sit outside $288,342. Federal awards in other databases are different datasets. Sharing an employer string and a calendar year does not turn these gifts into contracts or grants. The page is not a museum endowment and not a foundation 990.
Correlation between an employer or occupation string and a cycle year is not causation. The records show a text match, a date window, 1 donor, and 69 contributions. GUND, AGNES GUND FOUNDATION, and personal-name keys that did not collapse here are other keys if stored separately. All FEC ties lists other two-dimension pages.
Citing Agnes Gund and 2010 together
Start with $288,342, then Agnes Gund 2010 for rows, then the industry hub or the 2010 election cycle if a filter needs to come off. Citation template: Agnes Gund, 2010, $288,342, 69 contributions, 1 donor, 4.8% of $5,954,136, source FEC.gov. Keep neighboring spellings and occupation titles out of the total unless they grouped to this exact string.
The 4.8% share, the 1-donor count, and the $4,179 mean gift belong to this intersection. Carry them onto a successor label or a sibling occupation word and they stop being facts from this packet. This prose is a packet snapshot. If a later extract disagrees, FEC.gov and the live overlay control.
Questions
- How much did Agnes Gund donors give in 2010?
- FEC.gov aggregates show $288,342 in itemized individual contributions for the Agnes Gund grouping in the 2010 cycle, across 69 contributions and 1 donor. That sum is not a PAC total and not the $5,954,136 all-cycle figure. Filings remain on FEC.gov.
- What share of Agnes Gund FEC money is 2010?
- The grouping’s all-cycle total is $5,954,136. The 2010 cell of $288,342 is about 4.8% of that figure. Other cycles hold the remaining 95.2% on the industry hub. The overlay lists itemized rows for this cell; the Agnes Gund hub holds other cycles; the 2010 election cycle hub holds other employer strings from the same window.
- Is this Agnes Gund’s PAC or an official account?
- No. $288,342 is itemized individual receipts whose employer or occupation text grouped to Agnes Gund. Committee PAC filings and official organization accounts sit outside this rollup unless an individual receipt itself carries the string. The key is not a museum endowment and not a foundation 990.
- Where is the overlay for the Agnes Gund 2010 join?
- Open Agnes Gund 2010 for the cycle overlay, Agnes Gund for the grouping hub, and the 2010 election cycle for the year without this employer filter. All FEC ties lists other two-dimension pages. This JSON file names the join; the overlay holds the itemized rows. Original filings remain on FEC.gov.
FEC.gov individual contribution aggregates by employer/industry grouping and election cycle.