Agnes Gund and the 2014 FEC election cycle
Donors listing Agnes Gund reported $444,100 in itemized individual contributions during the 2014 federal election cycle, according to FEC.gov aggregates. Those dollars arrived in 100 contributions from 1 donor. The grouping’s stored total across cycles is $5,954,136; the 2014 slice is about 7.5% of that running sum. The employer grouping is a personal name as typed on itemizations — not a museum endowment, not a foundation Form 990, and not a PAC.
Key figures
- Agnes Gund × 2014 is $444,100 in itemized individual contributions.
- The cell includes 100 contributions from 1 donor.
- 2014 is about 7.5% of the grouping’s $5,954,136 all-cycle total.
- The label is self-reported form text, not a museum endowment, not a foundation Form 990, and not a PAC.
- FEC gifts and federal award files remain separate datasets.
Agnes Gund crossed with 2014
A personal name stored as an employer/industry string sits on one axis; election cycles sit on the other. Rows that match both — Agnes Gund and 2014 — sum to $444,100. 100 itemized contributions and 1 unique donor produced it. The total is not an official organization disbursement and does not name recipients. Independent expenditures and committee transfers live in other FEC tables. This page joins the employer/industry grouping (a personal name as typed) Agnes Gund to cycle 2014; it is not a restatement of either hub alone.
Neither the Agnes Gund hub nor the 2014 election cycle hub is this number; each hub drops one of the two keys. 1 unique donor and 100 lines in 2014 sit under the stored string AGNES GUND. AGNES GUND FOUNDATION, GUND, and MUSEUM OF MODERN ART stay on their own keys if filers used them. NEA grants or other cultural USAspending rows are a different file and are not funded by these itemized gifts. Campaign contributions are not federal awards.
7.5% of the Agnes Gund roll
The grouping’s stored total across cycles is $5,954,136 ($6 million). The 2014 slice of $444,100 is about 7.5% of that running sum. Other even-year windows hold the remaining 92.5%, or $5,510,036. Treating 2014 as the Agnes Gund FEC story would ignore that remainder. Quote $444,100 when the sentence is about 2014. Quote $5,954,136 when the sentence is about the grouping across cycles. Do not add those two dollar figures; the first is already inside the second.
Treat $5,954,136 as the denominator for the 7.5% share. It is not market capitalization, not revenue, and not proof of a multi-year political program. The industry hub is the year index for this string. This tie keeps 2014 from being folded silently into $5,954,136. 7.5% is $444,100 divided by $5,954,136. Rounding to $444,100 and $6 million does not create extra facts. Use exact integers in a table. Use the rounded forms only as headlines of those same integers.
100 contributions from 1 donor
Dividing $444,100 by 100 contributions yields about $4,441 per itemized gift. Dividing by 1 donor yields about $444,100 per donor. Contributions per donor average about 100.0. Those means describe the arithmetic on the packet. They are not medians and not a party split. Repeat gifts raise the contribution count faster than the donor count. The overlay for Agnes Gund 2014 holds the rows.
1 donor on 100 lines usually means many committee destinations or memo entries, not 100 people. Do not infer motive from the name on the employer line. Unitemized gifts never appear in $444,100. State-office campaigns never enter this cell. A later amendment can restate a large transfer while most of the 100 small lines stay put. After quarterly filings, reread the live overlay. If that hub and this snapshot disagree, FEC.gov controls.
2014 as the cycle dimension
The 2014 election cycle hub includes every stored employer or occupation for that window. Agnes Gund is one cell in that matrix. This packet does not publish a cycle-wide denominator, so no national share is stated. Open the 2014 election cycle to drop the employer/industry grouping (a personal name as typed) filter and Agnes Gund to drop the year. FEC cycle 2014 covers 2013–2014. A gift dated in the odd year and a gift dated in the even year can share the $444,100 cell because the cycle is a two-year tag, not a single Tuesday.
That mechanical fact is easy to forget when a searcher wants an election-night number. The overlay is where dates become visible. This join publishes the cycle total, the 100 contributions, the 1 unique donor, and the 7.5% share of $5,954,136. Comparing Agnes Gund in 2014 to another grouping requires that other grouping’s cycle hub. This packet has one grouping and one cycle.
Limits of the Agnes Gund × 2014 join
Itemized individual receipts are the universe. Unitemized gifts, independent expenditures, and PAC disbursements sit outside $444,100. NEA grants or other cultural USAspending rows are different datasets. Sharing an employer or occupation string and a calendar year does not turn these gifts into contracts or grants. Correlation between a stored string and a cycle year is not causation. The records show a text match, a date window, 1 donor, and 100 contributions.
AGNES GUND FOUNDATION, GUND, and MUSEUM OF MODERN ART are other keys if stored separately. LobbyVault does not merge neighboring spellings into AGNES GUND. The employer grouping is a personal name as typed on itemizations — not a museum endowment, not a foundation Form 990, and not a PAC. All FEC ties lists other two-dimension pages. A ranking of industries for 2014 is a different page — the 2014 election-cycle index — not a homemade sort of this file.
Citing Agnes Gund and 2014 together
Start with $444,100, then Agnes Gund 2014 for rows, then the industry hub or the 2014 election cycle if a filter needs to come off. Citation template: Agnes Gund, 2014, $444,100, 100 contributions, 1 donor, 7.5% of $5,954,136, source FEC.gov. Keep neighboring spellings and occupation titles out of the total unless they grouped to this exact string.
The 7.5% share, the 1 donor count, and the $4,441 mean gift belong to this intersection. Carry them onto a successor label or a sibling string and they stop being facts from this packet. This prose is a packet snapshot. If a later extract disagrees, FEC.gov and the live overlay control. Do not print a 2014 share of US politics from $444,100. The denominator for 7.5% is $5,954,136, the Agnes Gund grouping in this extract, not every itemized dollar on FEC.gov.
Questions
- How much did Agnes Gund donors give in 2014?
- FEC.gov aggregates show $444,100 in itemized individual contributions for the Agnes Gund grouping in the 2014 cycle, across 100 contributions and 1 donor. That sum is not a PAC total and not the $5,954,136 all-cycle figure. Cite FEC.gov for the Agnes Gund × 2014 join.
- What share of Agnes Gund FEC money is 2014?
- The grouping’s all-cycle total is $5,954,136. The 2014 cell of $444,100 is about 7.5% of that figure. Other cycles hold the remaining 92.5% ($5,510,036) on the industry hub. The overlay lists itemized rows for this cell; the Agnes Gund hub holds other cycles.
- Is this Agnes Gund’s PAC or an official account?
- No. $444,100 is itemized individual receipts whose employer or occupation text grouped to Agnes Gund. Committee PAC filings and official organization accounts sit outside this rollup. The key is not a museum endowment, not a foundation Form 990, and not a PAC. Filings remain on FEC.gov.
- Where is the overlay for the Agnes Gund 2014 join?
- Open Agnes Gund 2014 for the cycle overlay, Agnes Gund for the grouping hub, and the 2014 election cycle for the year without this filter. All FEC ties lists other two-dimension pages. This JSON file names the join; the overlay holds the itemized rows.
FEC.gov individual contribution aggregates by employer/industry grouping and election cycle.