Donors in Enterprise, AL to CLUB FOR GROWTH ACTION
$11,491,827 in itemized individual contributions is the join between donor city ENTERPRISE (AL) and recipient committee CLUB FOR GROWTH ACTION (C00487470). That cell is not Enterprise, AL’s all-committee book of $18,506,704. Source: FEC.gov aggregates of itemized Schedule A lines grouped by filer-entered city and committee ID. These figures are not independent expenditures.
Key figures
- $11,491,827 is the Enterprise, AL × CLUB FOR GROWTH ACTION (C00487470) itemized join.
- $18,506,704 is the all-committee Enterprise, AL book; this committee is 62.1% of that book.
- Leftover $7,014,877 under the ENTERPRISE city string went to other committees.
- City labels are filer-entered; this packet is not independent expenditures.
- If the live hub or overlay disagrees, the newer FEC extract controls.
How Enterprise, AL meets Club for Growth Action on the FEC tape
$11,491,827 is the overlap of two keys: contributor city ENTERPRISE with state AL, and recipient committee C00487470 disclosed as CLUB FOR GROWTH ACTION. LobbyVault keeps a Enterprise, AL city hub and a committee hub for Club for Growth Action. Neither hub is this join. The city hub is every committee that received itemized gifts storing this city string. The committee hub is every city that gave to C00487470. This page is only both filters at once.
CLUB FOR GROWTH ACTION is the stored name on C00487470. The join does not name unique donors, contribution counts, or cycles. Do not invent a headcount from $11,491,827. Repeat gifts, joint fundraising, and conduit memo entries can sit inside a city×committee total without this packet splitting them.
City labels are filer-entered. ENTERPRISE is the stored string, not a Census place recode and not a metro-area roll-up. A donor who stored a neighboring city is on another hub. A donor who stored ENTERPRISE and a different committee ID is in the leftover $7,014,877 of the city book, not in $11,491,827.
The Enterprise, AL side of the Club for Growth Action join
Enterprise, AL’s all-committee itemized book in this extract is $18,506,704. $11,491,827 is 62.1% of Enterprise, AL’s $18,506,704 all-committee book — a large slice of the stored city string, still only the rows whose recipient is C00487470. The leftover $7,014,877 went to other committees under the same city string, or sits outside this recipient filter. Open the Enterprise, AL hub for that remainder; do not subtract by hand from a different extract.
The stored city sits in Alabama. Neighboring municipalities are not absorbed into ENTERPRISE. Alabama campaign-finance pages include other cities. Do not add $11,491,827 to the state hub; the state extract already contains these rows when the same tape is used. All FEC ties lists other city-committee pages. None of them converts $11,491,827 into spending by Enterprise, AL candidates or into independent expenditures by Club for Growth Action.
CLUB FOR GROWTH ACTION (C00487470) as the recipient key
C00487470 is disclosed as CLUB FOR GROWTH ACTION. This page does not list independent expenditures the committee made, operating expenditures it paid, or earmark destinations beyond the labeled recipient. $11,491,827 is itemized individual receipts storing city ENTERPRISE and committee C00487470. Other cities giving to Club for Growth Action appear on the committee hub. Adding them here would break the city filter.
Quote the committee with its FEC ID so a similarly named filing is not swapped in. Club for Growth Action on another ID is a different page. This URL is Enterprise, AL × C00487470, not Alabama × C00487470 and not every spelling of ENTERPRISE. If the overlay at the committee path disagrees with $11,491,827, the overlay and FEC.gov control.
Share of the Enterprise, AL book
62.1% of $18,506,704 is $11,491,827 to CLUB FOR GROWTH ACTION (C00487470). That percentage describes overlap of two FEC groupings, not a finding that residents of Enterprise, AL as a group preferred this committee. Most of the $18,506,704 city book went to other committees unless 62.1% is read as a large slice — even then, the slice is still only the C00487470 filter.
The leftover $7,014,877 under the ENTERPRISE city string went to other committees. The Enterprise, AL hub holds that remainder. The Club for Growth Action page holds receipts whose city field did not store ENTERPRISE. Do not stack this cell with another city’s gifts to C00487470; each join is its own filter.
What the Enterprise, AL × Club for Growth Action dollars omit
Unitemized federal gifts sit outside $11,491,827. Alabama state-office filings sit outside it. Independent expenditures are a different FEC file; the source note on this packet says these aggregates are not independent expenditures. City labels are filer-entered. PAC or joint-fundraising addresses that stored this city string follow the same rule as household streets.
Do not read $11,491,827 as proof that Enterprise, AL “funded” Club for Growth Action as a municipal act, or that the committee spent the money in Alabama. The join is two fields. Correlation is not causation. FEC individual contributions are not USAspending awards. This packet has no obligation dollars and no award counts. Do not add $11,491,827 to federal spending in Alabama.
Contribution lines can cluster in a few ZIPs or spread across many. This packet does not list those ZIPs or a donor headcount. Open the city hub and the committee hub rather than guessing a postal split from the city string alone.
How to cite the Enterprise, AL × Club for Growth Action join
Internal links go to Enterprise, AL, CLUB FOR GROWTH ACTION, Alabama campaign finance, and All FEC ties. Use those four doors. The city page holds the $18,506,704 book and the committees that received the leftover $7,014,877. The committee page holds C00487470 receipts from every city. All FEC ties collects neighboring pairs without mixing independent expenditures into this cell.
Researchers citing the join should keep both nouns in the sentence: Enterprise, AL and CLUB FOR GROWTH ACTION (C00487470). Dropping either noun turns this page into a restatement of a hub it is not. $11,491,827 is the only overlap this extract published. A later amendment wave can move a dollar without this file rewriting itself. Treat the live LobbyVault hub as newer than this packet snapshot.
Cite $11,491,827, $18,506,704, 62.1%, leftover $7,014,877, and C00487470. Keep both sides named: ENTERPRISE as filer-entered city, CLUB FOR GROWTH ACTION as recipient. Motive is outside the packet. Unitemized gifts never appear. Live hubs override this snapshot. If the overlay disagrees, the overlay and FEC.gov control.
Questions
- How much did Enterprise, AL donors give Club for Growth Action?
- Itemized FEC individual contributions storing city ENTERPRISE and recipient CLUB FOR GROWTH ACTION (C00487470) total $11,491,827 in this extract. That is the join, not Enterprise, AL’s all-committee book of $18,506,704. These figures are not independent expenditures. Original reports remain on FEC.gov.
- Does the Enterprise, AL total include every spelling of the city name?
- No. ENTERPRISE is the exact stored city string with state AL. Other spellings, abbreviations, and neighboring places are other keys and are omitted from $11,491,827. LobbyVault does not recode the field into a Census place. Use the Enterprise, AL hub for the all-committee book of $18,506,704.
- What share of Enterprise, AL itemized money went to Club for Growth Action?
- $11,491,827 is 62.1% of the $18,506,704 Enterprise, AL city book. The leftover $7,014,877 went to other committees under the same city string. Quote both dollars and the committee ID C00487470. Do not upgrade 62.1% into a ranking of civic preference.
- Are the Enterprise, AL Club for Growth Action figures from FEC.gov?
- Yes. The numbers are FEC.gov itemized contribution aggregates indexed on LobbyVault: $11,491,827 for the Enterprise, AL × C00487470 join and $18,506,704 for the city string. If a later extract or the committee overlay disagrees with this snapshot, the Commission’s filing controls.
FEC.gov aggregates of itemized individual contributions grouped by donor city and recipient committee. Not independent expenditures.