Analyst donations in the 2014 FEC cycle

Analyst × 2014

ANALYST plus cycle 2014 equals $833,073. That figure is the harvested sum of itemized individual contributions in which the occupation field matched this string and the two-year federal election cycle was 2014. Financial analyst, research analyst, policy analyst, and data analyst are other keys if those words appear. This join does not recode the label into a CFA Society census, a bank title file, or a think-tank headcount. Other cycle amounts are not fields in this packet.

Parent hubs: Analyst donations at /occupations/analyst/ and the 2014 election cycle at /election-cycles/2014/. All occupations lists neighboring titles. All FEC ties keeps each occupation-year cell on its own path so a reader can move without mixing $833,073 into another year or another string. Do not add those parent pages into this cell.

Party, committee, and employer breakdowns for Analyst in 2014 are not fields in this packet. Do not infer a partisan split from $833,073. Finance versus policy versus operations analysis is unpublished for Analyst in 2014. The occupation page and the 2014 cycle page are the next clicks for named committees.

ANALYST as a one-word title

$21.5 million ($21,535,032) belongs to the exact string ANALYST across harvested cycles. It is not a CFA Society census, a bank title file, or a think-tank headcount. People who wrote nearby wording — financial analyst, research analyst, policy analyst, and data analyst — sit in other rows if the characters differ. The 2014 slice is 3.9% of that title bucket. Share of ANALYST is not share of all 2014 receipts.

Amended individual contribution reports can move $833,073. A later harvest of the same occupation string can move $21,535,032. Rewrite only the sentence whose source moved. Live Analyst donations and the live 2014 election cycle pages are the tables; this prose is a packet snapshot. Itemized individual contributions are the only receipt class in this cell. Unitemized gifts below the itemization threshold, in-kind goods, and bundled contributions without this occupation string are outside $833,073.

782 analyst receipts in a midterm

326 donors and 782 receipts — about 2.4 lines per donor. Mean per receipt about $1,065; mean per donor about $2,555. Those ratios are arithmetic on two harvested integers. They are not medians, not typical gifts, and not a claim about income. 326 donors makes this a modest occupation-cycle cell. No median is published in this packet.

Repeat gifts add receipts. 782 is a line count, not 326 one-time gifts; about two lines per donor, which is consistent with repeat gifts inside the same two-year window. Finance versus policy versus operations analysis is not encoded in the occupation string. Neither figure is a headcount of everyone who works in the field named by ANALYST. People who left occupation blank, used a nearby spelling, or listed a more specific title are not in $833,073.

Generic analyst versus employer PACs

Cite $833,073 as Analyst in 2014. Cite $21,535,032 as this title’s occupation total. Do not add the employer’s PAC to either figure. Those filings are committee reports. Mixing PAC spending with $833,073 would blend FEC tables. All occupations lists neighboring titles so a searcher can open the other string’s cycle cell rather than rescale 3.9%.

FEC.gov individual contribution aggregates by self-reported occupation and election cycle. This join does not recode ANALYST into a Bureau of Labor Statistics title, a NAICS code, or a license class. If a researcher needs those crosswalks, they start from the raw string. Correlation is not causation: a midterm-year total does not prove the occupation’s motives, and it does not attach these gifts to any federal spending dataset.

How to cite analyst money in 2014

A clean footnote names occupation ANALYST, election cycle 2014, $833,073 in itemized individual contributions, 782 receipts, and 326 donors on FEC.gov. Keep the itemized word. Mean dollars remain about $1,065 per line and $2,555 per donor in the cell. If the live Analyst donations overlay has refreshed, quote the overlay. Do not treat 782 as unique workers in the trade.

This URL exists because two filters meet. Analyst donations rolls every cycle into one ANALYST running total. The 2014 election cycle rolls every occupation into one 2014 total. Only the Analyst × 2014 overlay applies both filters, which is why this page cites 782 receipts and $833,073. All FEC ties is the directory of other occupation-cycle cells.

Questions

How much did analyst filers donate in 2014?

Filers who listed Analyst itemized $833,073 in FEC individual contributions in 2014, from 782 receipts and 326 donors. That is 3.9% of $21,535,032 under ANALYST. Financial analyst, research analyst, policy analyst, and data analyst are other keys when those are the words on the form. Figures are FEC.gov individual contribution aggregates.

Does this include bank or employer PACs?

No. $833,073 is individual contributions tagged Analyst in 2014. The employer’s PAC file as committees. Mixing PAC spending with $833,073 would blend FEC tables. See Analyst donations or the 2014 election cycle hub for committee names. Analyst in 2014 is $833,073 on 782 receipts from 326 donors.

Are analyst labels standardized on FEC forms?

No. FEC.gov stores the occupation as typed. This join uses ANALYST. Financial analyst, research analyst, policy analyst, and data analyst are other keys when those characters appear. LobbyVault does not recode the string into a CFA Society census, a bank title file, or a think-tank headcount. Cite $833,073 for this title in 2014 on 782 receipts from 326 donors.

What two tables meet on this page?

Analyst donations ($21.5 million for the string) and the 2014 election cycle. The overlap is $833,073 from 782 receipts and 326 donors. All FEC ties lists other occupation-cycle cells. All occupations lists neighboring titles. Figures are FEC.gov individual contribution aggregates for Analyst in 2014.