Skip to main content
← All data ties

Attorney political contributions from Beverly Hills, CA

Filers who listed Attorney and Beverly Hills, CA on FEC.gov itemized individual contributions reported $30,475 across 42 receipts from 34 donors. Beverly Hills as a whole indexes $243,943,527 across 325,245 itemized contributions. The Attorney slice is under 0.1% of the city dollar total. Those figures share a filer-entered city label; they are not a claim that the grouping runs the city’s politics.

Key figures

  • Attorney in Beverly Hills, CA: $30,475 on 42 receipts from 34 donors.
  • Beverly Hills city-wide FEC itemized total: $243,943,527 on 325,245 contributions.
  • The Attorney slice is under 0.1% of Beverly Hills dollars — a labeled subset, not the city book.
  • ATTORNEY is an exact filer-entered label, not a sector roll-up.
  • City labels are filer-entered. The join is not a federal-award trail.

How Attorney meets Beverly Hills

This page is a join. One dimension is contributor city Beverly Hills, CA. The other is occupation or industry grouping Attorney (stored as ATTORNEY). $30,475 is the intersection — dollars on receipts that carry both labels. $243,943,527 is the city bucket before the employer filter, built from 325,245 itemized lines. The harvested donor count inside the intersection is 34 donors, not a census of everyone in Beverly Hills who ever worked in a related trade.

LobbyVault does not add a third table and does not route these dollars through USAspending. A Form 3 itemization is not a federal award. Open the Beverly Hills, CA city hub for the unfiltered city book, the Attorney industry hub for the grouping outside this city filter, California campaign finance for the state roll-up, and All FEC ties for sibling joins. Each of those pages answers a different question. This one answers only the intersection.

42 contributions from 34 donors produced $30,475. Repeat gifts add receipts; 34 donors is the headcount in this extract for the join, not a Census of Attorney workers in Beverly Hills. Arithmetic mean per receipt is about $726; per donor, about $896. Those means are division of packet facts, not typical salaries and not medians.

What the Beverly Hills city book holds

Beverly Hills indexes $243,943,527 ($244 million rounded) on 325,245 itemized individual contributions. City labels are filer-entered. A suburb that types a different city never enters $243,943,527. Joint-fundraising and committee addresses that happen to list Beverly Hills can sit in the same bucket as residents. The packet does not publish a unique-donor count for the city as a whole, so this page does not invent one from 325,245.

California campaign-finance pages cover the state, which is a larger geography than Beverly Hills. Do not treat $243,943,527 as the CA state total. Unitemized federal gifts never carry a published city in this roll-up, so they never enter $243,943,527. State-office campaigns in California file under state law and sit outside these FEC individual-contribution aggregates. Beverly Hills is a distinct stored city from Los Angeles. Do not fold $30,475 into a Los Angeles Attorney or Investor join.

The Attorney slice inside Beverly Hills

Inside Beverly Hills, receipts tagged Attorney total $30,475 on 42 lines from 34 donors. That is under 0.1% of $243,943,527. About $726 per receipt is $30,475 divided by 42. About $896 per harvested donor is $30,475 divided by 34. Those ratios describe shape. They are not medians, not typical household gifts, and not salaries.

ATTORNEY is an exact employer/industry string on the itemization, not a NAICS sector and not every person who works in a related job. Other law-firm names, LAWYER, partnership titles, and blank employer rows are other keys. $30,475 counts only rows that stored this string in Beverly Hills, CA.

Repeat gifts, household pairs, and spelling variants of Attorney that did not match this key never enter $30,475. Repeat gifts that did match add to 42 without necessarily adding to 34. Keep line count and donor count attached to their nouns when citing Beverly Hills.

What this join is not

It is not a ranking of Beverly Hills neighborhoods. It is not a safety comparison. It is not proof that Attorney money funded a federal contract, grant, or loan. Campaign contributions and USAspending awards are different disclosure systems even when they mention the same city. This packet has no award dollars, so this page prints none.

It is not Attorney nationwide unless the industry hub — a different page — is cited separately, and this packet does not harvest that nationwide integer. It is not a PAC independent-expenditure total. Motive is not a field. Party split is not a field in this packet. Missing fields stay missing.

under 0.1% is $30,475 divided by $243,943,527. Rounding the city total to $244 million does not create a second extract. Use $243,943,527 in a table. Use $244 million only as a headline form of the same integer. Correlation is not causation: two filer-entered fields meeting is not evidence that Attorney “controls” Beverly Hills politics.

How to cite the Beverly Hills × Attorney facts

Citation template: occupation or industry grouping Attorney, contributor city Beverly Hills, CA, $30,475 on 42 itemized individual contributions from 34 donors, against a city-wide $243,943,527 on 325,245 contributions (under 0.1% of city dollars). Source: FEC.gov individual contribution aggregates indexed on LobbyVault. City labels are filer-entered.

Then send the reader to the live Beverly Hills, CA hub, the Attorney industry page, California campaign finance, and All FEC ties. This prose is a packet snapshot. If a later extract disagrees, FEC.gov and the live hubs control. Do not add $30,475 to $243,943,527; the first number is already inside the second.

Using the Beverly Hills and Attorney hubs together

The Beverly Hills, CA hub is the unfiltered city index: $243,943,527 on 325,245 lines. The Attorney hub is the grouping without this city’s filter; this packet does not print that nationwide integer, so do not guess it from $30,475. California campaign finance is the state roll-up, a larger geography than Beverly Hills. All FEC ties is the inventory of other two-table pages. Use all four links. None of them turns $30,475 into a federal award.

If you need names, open the live city and industry hubs rather than reverse-engineering 34 donors from this snapshot. If you need cycle cuts of Beverly Hills, those are city-cycle joins, not this file. If you need Attorney in a single even-year window, those are industry-cycle joins. This file stays on one city and one employer string: Beverly Hills and Attorney, $30,475, 42 receipts, 34 donors.

Questions

How much did Attorney donors in Beverly Hills contribute?
Itemized individual contributions tagged Attorney and Beverly Hills, CA total $30,475 across 42 receipts from 34 donors on FEC.gov aggregates indexed here. That join is under 0.1% of Beverly Hills’s $243,943,527 city-wide book. It is not a PAC total. Original reports remain on FEC.gov.
Is $30,475 the full Beverly Hills political-money total?
No. Beverly Hills indexes $243,943,527 across 325,245 itemized contributions. $30,475 is only the Attorney employer/occupation slice inside that city. Other strings, unitemized gifts, and state-office filings sit outside the join. Filings remain on FEC.gov.
Does Attorney money in Beverly Hills fund federal spending there?
No. These figures are FEC individual contributions, not USAspending awards. $30,475 does not become a contract because both rows can mention Beverly Hills. Different statutes, different forms. This packet has no obligation dollars. Filings remain on FEC.gov.
Where are the Beverly Hills and Attorney live tables?
Use the Beverly Hills, CA city hub, the Attorney industry hub, California campaign finance, and All FEC ties. Original itemizations remain on FEC.gov. This guide quotes $30,475, 42 receipts, 34 donors, and $243,943,527.

FEC.gov individual contribution aggregates by donor city and employer/industry grouping. City labels are filer-entered.