Attorney political contributions from Denver, CO

Schedule A rows that carry both Attorney and Denver

Schedule A lines that carry both ATTORNEY and DENVER sum to $17,267. That is the only dollar figure this join publishes besides the city book. 42 receipts and 33 donors are the matching counts. Denver's unfiltered total remains $238,927,176 on 599360 contributions.

FEC.gov is the source system. LobbyVault indexes the aggregates. Filer-entered city and employer strings are not recoded to Census places or NAICS codes. A misspelled neighbor city is a different key. A shortened company name is a different key. $17,267 does not absorb those other keys.

Per-receipt arithmetic is about $411 ($17,267 / 42). Per-donor arithmetic is about $523 ($17,267 / 33). Cite those as division results. Do not upgrade them into typical gift sizes. Repeat itemizations from the same person raise 42 without necessarily raising 33.

How under 0.1% sits inside Denver

City-field volume (599360) and join volume (42) are different counts. 599360 is every itemized individual line that stored DENVER. 42 is the subset that also stored ATTORNEY. Dollar counterparts are $238,927,176 and $17,267. Quote pairs, not isolated percentages.

Denver is stored as DENVER in Colorado; Boulder, Aurora, and other Front Range strings are other keys. Colorado campaign finance still mixes Denver with every other CO city. This join does not. Recipient location is not in these facts.

Attorney is an exact stored string

On the industry side, the packet lists $17,267, 42 receipts, and 33 donors for ATTORNEY. With the city filter, those same figures are the Denver intersection in this snapshot. Do not invent a larger national industry total. If you need Attorney in every city, use the industry hub, not this URL.

Occupation string labels can look like jobs or like firm names. Either way the rule is exact match. ATTORNEY in DENVER is counted. A longer label that merely contains related words is a different key unless it is exactly this string.

No donor names, no committees invented

This page never lists the 33 harvested people by name. The packet did not supply names. Inventing a donor would break the contract. Inventing a committee or a cycle split would do the same.

ATTORNEY is a stored occupation string, not a state-bar census and not every lawyer or law-firm name. Denver is stored as DENVER in Colorado; Boulder, Aurora, and other Front Range strings are other keys. $17,267 on 42 receipts is the complete join besides the city book of $238,927,176.

Citing $17,267 without dropping a side

If you drop Denver from a sentence about $17,267, you have described the industry hub, which this page is not. If you drop Attorney, you have described the city hub, which this page is not. Keep ATTORNEY and DENVER together. under 0.1% of $238,927,176 is the only share computed here.

Unitemized gifts remain outside every total on this page. Independent expenditures remain outside. Colorado state-office filings remain outside.

The join is small relative to Denver by construction: $17,267 versus $238,927,176 is under 0.1%, leaving $238,909,909 (100.0%) on other stored employer strings. That remainder is not a mystery sector; it is every other exact label in the Denver extract. ATTORNEY is stored as an occupation/employer grouping on the itemization, not a NAICS sector and not every related job title. 33 harvested donors — a broader stored-label cluster produced 42 receipts totaling $17,267. Public records, not accusations. A contributor city in CO does not assign the recipient committee to Colorado. Campaign receipts and USAspending awards remain different statutes even when both mention Denver. Internal links stay on Denver, CO, Attorney, Colorado campaign finance, and All FEC ties. Canonical path is /ties/attorney-donors-in-co-denver/.

Share under 0.1% is a table identity

under 0.1% = $17,267 / $238,927,176. 100.0% of $238,927,176 used other employer/occupation strings. Those identities do not use 42 or 33. Keep share (dollars) separate from file size (receipts) and headcount (donors).

Do not treat under 0.1% as Attorney's share of Colorado or of the United States. Those denominators are not in these facts. The denominator is Denver, CO's $238,927,176 city book.

Because 33 harvested donors sit on 42 receipts, the cluster can look concentrated. Concentration in a disclosure extract is not a company-town finding and not a list of names. This prose does not invent the people. $17,267 is the dollar sum of the matching lines. under 0.1% of $238,927,176 is the table share. Denver is stored as DENVER in Colorado; Boulder, Aurora, and other Front Range strings are other keys. ATTORNEY is a stored occupation string, not a state-bar census and not every lawyer or law-firm name. Use Denver, CO, Attorney, Colorado campaign finance, and All FEC ties as the four doors. Canonical path: /ties/attorney-donors-in-co-denver/.

Questions

Where do Attorney and Denver, CO overlap in FEC data?

On itemized individual contribution rows that stored both ATTORNEY and DENVER. Those rows sum to $17,267 across 42 receipts from 33 donors. The city hub without the industry filter remains $238,927,176 on 599360 lines. Original filings are on FEC.gov. Labels are filer-entered.

Why is the Attorney share of Denver only under 0.1%?

Because the key is an exact string. Most of the $238,927,176 Denver book used other employer labels (100.0%). under 0.1% is a table identity, not proof the trade is absent. Do not recode ATTORNEY into a sector and then treat under 0.1% as that sector's weight.

Does this page name the Attorney donors in Denver?

No. The packet publishes 33 donors as a harvested count, not a roster. This prose does not invent names, committees, parties, or cycles. $17,267 on 42 receipts is the numeric join. Live hubs control if a later FEC extract revises the count.

Are Denver Attorney gifts the same as local candidate spending?

No. Donor city DENVER is an address field. Recipients can be committees anywhere in the FEC system. $17,267 is not spending by Denver candidates and is not a Colorado office filing total. Independent expenditures are another FEC table and are omitted here.