Attorney political contributions from Tulsa, OK

Schedule A rows that carry both Attorney and Tulsa

Schedule A lines that carry both ATTORNEY and TULSA sum to $20,750. That is the only dollar figure this join publishes besides the city book. 31 receipts and 23 donors are the matching counts. Tulsa's unfiltered total remains $128,640,043 on 270118 contributions.

FEC.gov is the source system. LobbyVault indexes the aggregates. Filer-entered city and employer strings are not recoded to Census places or NAICS codes. A misspelled neighbor city is a different key. A shortened company name is a different key. $20,750 does not absorb those other keys.

Per-receipt arithmetic is about $669 ($20,750 / 31). Per-donor arithmetic is about $902 ($20,750 / 23). Cite those as division results. Do not upgrade them into typical gift sizes. Repeat itemizations from the same person raise 31 without necessarily raising 23.

How under 0.1% sits inside Tulsa

City-field volume (270118) and join volume (31) are different counts. 270118 is every itemized individual line that stored TULSA. 31 is the subset that also stored ATTORNEY. Dollar counterparts are $128,640,043 and $20,750. Quote pairs, not isolated percentages.

Tulsa is stored as TULSA in Oklahoma; Oklahoma City is a different city key. Oklahoma campaign finance still mixes Tulsa with every other OK city. This join does not. Recipient location is not in these facts.

Attorney is an exact stored string

On the industry side, the packet lists $20,750, 31 receipts, and 23 donors for ATTORNEY. With the city filter, those same figures are the Tulsa intersection in this snapshot. Do not invent a larger national industry total. If you need Attorney in every city, use the industry hub, not this URL.

Occupation string labels can look like jobs or like firm names. Either way the rule is exact match. ATTORNEY in TULSA is counted. A longer label that merely contains related words is a different key unless it is exactly this string.

No donor names, no committees invented

This page never lists the 23 harvested people by name. The packet did not supply names. Inventing a donor would break the contract. Inventing a committee or a cycle split would do the same.

ATTORNEY is a stored occupation string, not a state-bar census and not every lawyer or law-firm name. Tulsa is stored as TULSA in Oklahoma; Oklahoma City is a different city key. $20,750 on 31 receipts is the complete join besides the city book of $128,640,043.

Citing $20,750 without dropping a side

If you drop Tulsa from a sentence about $20,750, you have described the industry hub, which this page is not. If you drop Attorney, you have described the city hub, which this page is not. Keep ATTORNEY and TULSA together. under 0.1% of $128,640,043 is the only share computed here.

Unitemized gifts remain outside every total on this page. Independent expenditures remain outside. Oklahoma state-office filings remain outside.

The join is small relative to Tulsa by construction: $20,750 versus $128,640,043 is under 0.1%, leaving $128,619,293 (100.0%) on other stored employer strings. That remainder is not a mystery sector; it is every other exact label in the Tulsa extract. ATTORNEY is stored as an occupation/employer grouping on the itemization, not a NAICS sector and not every related job title. 23 harvested donors — a broader stored-label cluster produced 31 receipts totaling $20,750. Public records, not accusations. A contributor city in OK does not assign the recipient committee to Oklahoma. Campaign receipts and USAspending awards remain different statutes even when both mention Tulsa. Internal links stay on Tulsa, OK, Attorney, Oklahoma campaign finance, and All FEC ties. Canonical path is /ties/attorney-donors-in-ok-tulsa/.

Share under 0.1% is a table identity

under 0.1% = $20,750 / $128,640,043. 100.0% of $128,640,043 used other employer/occupation strings. Those identities do not use 31 or 23. Keep share (dollars) separate from file size (receipts) and headcount (donors).

Do not treat under 0.1% as Attorney's share of Oklahoma or of the United States. Those denominators are not in these facts. The denominator is Tulsa, OK's $128,640,043 city book.

Because 23 harvested donors sit on 31 receipts, the cluster can look concentrated. Concentration in a disclosure extract is not a company-town finding and not a list of names. This prose does not invent the people. $20,750 is the dollar sum of the matching lines. under 0.1% of $128,640,043 is the table share. Tulsa is stored as TULSA in Oklahoma; Oklahoma City is a different city key. ATTORNEY is a stored occupation string, not a state-bar census and not every lawyer or law-firm name. Use Tulsa, OK, Attorney, Oklahoma campaign finance, and All FEC ties as the four doors. Canonical path: /ties/attorney-donors-in-ok-tulsa/.

Questions

How much did Attorney donors in Tulsa, OK give?

Itemized FEC individual contributions storing industry grouping ATTORNEY and city TULSA total $20,750 across 31 receipts from 23 donors in this extract. That is the join, not Tulsa, OK's all-industry book of $128,640,043 on 270118 contributions. Original reports remain on FEC.gov. Labels are filer-entered.

Does Attorney in Tulsa include every related job title?

No. ATTORNEY is the exact stored string. Other employer spellings, parent names, and related titles are other keys and are omitted from $20,750. 23 donors and 31 receipts follow that exact-match rule. LobbyVault does not map the field to a standardized occupation list or NAICS sector.

What share of Tulsa, OK itemized money is Attorney?

$20,750 is under 0.1% of the $128,640,043 Tulsa, OK city book (270118 city-field contributions). A thin share usually means other employer strings dominate the city tape, not that the grouping is absent from Tulsa. Quote both dollars. Do not upgrade under 0.1% into a sector ranking or a Oklahoma share.

Do Attorney donations in Tulsa fund federal spending there?

No. These figures are FEC individual contributions, not USAspending awards. $20,750 does not become a contract or assistance award because both datasets can mention Tulsa. Different statutes, different forms. This packet has no obligation dollars and no award counts. Filings remain on FEC.gov.