Banking political money in the 2010 FEC cycle

How the Banking and 2010 tables meet

Employer and occupation groupings sit on one axis; election cycles sit on the other. Rows that match both — Banking and 2010 — sum to $377,967. The cell holds 500 itemized contributions and 217 unique donors. The total is not an official organization disbursement and does not name recipients. Independent expenditures and committee transfers live in other FEC tables.

Neither the Banking hub nor the 2010 election cycle hub is this number; each hub drops one of the two keys. Banking is self-reported industry-word occupation, not a chartered bank. Banker, bank officer, and finance remain other groupings. Open Banking donations for other cycles, and the 2010 election cycle for other occupation strings.

Dividing $377,967 by 500 contributions yields about $756 per itemized gift. Dividing by 217 donors yields about $1,742 per donor. Contributions per donor average about 2.3. Those means describe the arithmetic on the packet. They are not medians, not a party split, and not a typical salary.

4.0% of stored Banking dollars

2010 holds $377,967 of $9,515,899 — 4.0%. The leftover $9,137,932 is 96.0% of the labeled roll. Those leftover dollars are other cycles, not missing 2010 money.

Share language here is always $377,967 over $9,515,899. It is never $377,967 over all 2010 FEC receipts. No national cycle denominator is in the packet.

Volume: 500 lines, 217 identities

500 itemized contributions from 217 donors produced $377,967. About 2.3 lines per donor is a mean. The packet supplies no median and no largest-gift figure.

Contributor keys can include retirees and household members who reused a workplace or title. 217 is not a labor-force estimate for Banking.

Exclusions around $377,967

Outside $377,967: unitemized individual gifts, independent expenditures, PAC spending, and any federal award table. Inside $377,967: itemized individual receipts matching BANKING in cycle 2010.

The page is self-reported industry-word occupation, not a chartered bank, not an FDIC roster, a bank PAC, or Banker stored as a sibling key. Naming those exclusions keeps the join from being read as an association political budget.

Because 2010 is about 4.0% of $9,515,899, most stored Banking money sits outside this window ($9,137,932). The occupation hub is the index for those other cycles.

Volume math uses only three facts: $377,967, 500 contributions, 217 donors. Derived means are $756 per gift and $1,742 per identity. They describe this cell, not typical American giving.

A citation template for this join

Suggested citation: FEC.gov individual contribution aggregates, occupation BANKING, election cycle 2010, $377,967, 500 contributions, 217 donors (4.0% of $9,515,899 stored for the string).

Do not append NAICS codes, USAspending dollars, or named donors. Those facts are not in the packet. If a later overlay revises $377,967, the live table controls.

Searchers often want a single Tuesday. FEC cycle 2010 is two years. Both years can feed $377,967. Dates, if needed, belong on the overlay, not as invented subtotals.

The Commission does not verify that BANKING is a license or a current job. Banking is self-reported industry-word occupation, not a chartered bank. $377,967 is a text-match aggregate for 2010 itemized individual receipts.

Where to go next from this join

Open Banking donations for the $9,515,899 occupation total. Open the 2010 election cycle hub to place Banking beside other occupation strings that year. All occupations and All FEC ties list sibling joins. Original filings remain at FEC.gov. This tie page is the Banking × 2010 intersection only.

A durable citation names BANKING, 2010, $377,967, 500 contributions, 217 donors, and FEC.gov. Add 4.0% of $9,515,899 when lifetime context is required.

The occupation string BANKING is filer-entered. FEC.gov does not recode it into a license class or a NAICS code. Neighboring titles remain other occupation hubs.

Cycle 2010 is a two-year FEC tag. Itemized receipts from both years of that window sit in $377,967 if they carried this occupation string.

Unique donors in this packet number 217. This file does not publish names for those keys. Repeat gifts explain why contributions (500) exceed donor keys.

Unitemized gifts never enter $377,967. Independent expenditures, committee transfers, and USAspending awards are other tables and other datasets.

Cite both sides of the join whenever the dollars are quoted: occupation BANKING and cycle 2010, then $377,967, source FEC.gov.

Questions

How much did Banking-tagged donors give in 2010?

The join records $377,967 in itemized individual contributions for occupation Banking in the 2010 FEC cycle, from 500 contributions and 217 donors. The occupation’s all-cycle total is $9,515,899, so 2010 is 4.0% of that roll. Figures come from FEC.gov aggregates. Occupation labels are filer-entered.

How much of $9,515,899 is the 2010 cell?

$377,967 of $9,515,899 is 4.0%. The leftover $9,137,932 is other even-year windows on the occupation hub, not this join. Volume in 2010 is 500 itemized contributions from 217 donors. Occupation labels are filer-entered. Source: FEC.gov itemized individual aggregates. Occupation labels are filer-entered on FEC.gov itemized individual receipts.

Does this count every banking who donated in 2010?

No. The 217 donor keys are people whose itemized receipts grouped to BANKING in 2010. Filers who used a different title are other occupation rows. FEC.gov does not verify jobs. The cell totals $377,967 on 500 lines. Unitemized gifts never appear in this aggregate. Banker, bank officer, and finance are other keys if stored separately.

Where are the live Banking and 2010 tables?

Banking donations carries the $9,515,899 occupation total. The 2010 election cycle hub places Banking beside other occupation strings that year. All occupations and All FEC ties list sibling joins. Original filings remain at FEC.gov. This tie page is the Banking × 2010 intersection only.