Skip to main content
← All data ties

Baron Real Estate political money in the 2012 election cycle

FEC individual-contribution aggregates assign $3,810,000 to the Baron Real Estate employer grouping in the 2012 cycle. Thirteen itemized lines from four donors make up that cell. The grouping’s all-cycle total is only $3,893,726, so 2012 is 97.9% of everything this key holds in the table. The join is a named employer plus a presidential year, not a survey of the real-estate occupation string.

Key figures

  • $3,810,000 tagged Baron Real Estate in the 2012 FEC cycle.
  • 13 contributions from 4 donors; about $293,077 per contribution.
  • 2012 is 97.9% of the grouping’s $3,893,726 all-cycle total.
  • Named employer key, not the generic Real Estate occupation string.
  • Source: FEC.gov individual contribution aggregates.

When one cycle is almost the entire grouping

Most industry–cycle pages show a mid-single-digit share of an all-years roll. Baron Real Estate is the opposite: $3,810,000 of $3,893,726 sits in 2012. The residual $83,726 lives in other cycles. That ratio does not mean the firm appeared in 2012 and vanished; it means this particular grouped string’s itemized individual receipts are concentrated in that window.

Four donors and 13 contributions produce about $293,077 per line and about $952,500 per donor. Those averages are large relative to occupation-style keys that spread millions across hundreds of people. They describe this key’s 2012 shape. They do not identify the four people or the 13 recipient committees.

A 97.9% year share is easy to misread as “the firm only existed in 2012.” The table does not say that. It says that of the $3,893,726 this grouped string has recorded, $3,810,000 sits in the 2012 cell. The employer could have used other spellings in other years, or itemized volume could simply have peaked in a presidential window. Those alternatives are not facts in the packet. The facts are 13 lines, 4 donors, $3,810,000, and a remainder of $83,726 outside 2012.

Named brokerage versus the Real Estate label

Baron Real Estate is an employer name, not the generic Real Estate grouping. Donors who wrote only “real estate” are in a different row. Combining the two would mix a four-donor cell with a 782-donor occupation cell. This tie keeps the legal-name key isolated so the $3,810,000 is not mistaken for sector-wide giving.

As-filed spellings still matter. Hyphens, “LLC,” and personal names can split related receipts into other keys. If a researcher expected a larger lifetime total than $3,893,726, the missing dollars may sit under a different string rather than in a later cycle of this one.

2012 as the calendar, not the motive

2012 is a presidential cycle. Large individual receipts often appear as Super PAC gifts, joint-fundraising transfers, or bundled candidate support. The facts here do not split those types. They fix 13 lines, 4 donors, and $3,810,000. Motive language would be invention.

The overlay carries recipient-level rows for this intersection. The 2012 cycle hub places Baron Real Estate among other employer strings that year, including both giant occupation labels and other small named keys. Comparison is of table cells, not of civic virtue.

Caveats on a 97.9% year

A near-total concentration in one cycle can reflect a one-time gift pattern, a short-lived employer string, or a grouping that only recently matched. This page cannot choose among those explanations. It can report the arithmetic: 97.9% of the key’s recorded individual money is the 2012 cell.

PAC disbursements, independent expenditures, and state gifts are outside the $3,810,000. Federal awards to real-estate firms are USAspending, not FEC. Do not read the join as a pipeline from these four donors to any contract.

Hubs that complete the picture

The Baron Real Estate 2012 overlay is the data view of this join. The industry hub shows the $3,893,726 all-cycle figure and whatever residual years exist. The 2012 election-cycle hub is the year-wide employer list. The ties index lists other industry–cycle URLs that follow the same two-sided naming rule.

Keeping a named brokerage out of the occupation bucket

Cite Baron Real Estate and 2012 together with $3,810,000, 13 contributions, and 4 donors. Then state that 2012 is 97.9% of the grouping’s $3,893,726 all-cycle total. That is the whole numeric story this file is allowed to tell. Folding the cell into the generic Real Estate occupation page would hide a four-donor, high-average pattern inside a 782-donor presidential occupation cell. The two keys answer different questions.

The overlay is the recipient list. The industry hub is the $3,893,726 roll and the small residual years. The 2012 cycle hub is the year’s employer list. The ties index is other industry–cycle pages. FEC.gov individual aggregates are the source. Property deals, zoning boards, and USAspending housing awards are outside the join. Four donor keys are matching results, not a confirmed set of principals.

Questions

How much did Baron Real Estate donors give in 2012?
The FEC join records $3,810,000 in itemized individual contributions for Baron Real Estate in 2012, from 13 contributions and 4 donors. The grouping’s all-cycle total is $3,893,726.
Why is 2012 almost all of this grouping?
Because $3,810,000 is 97.9% of $3,893,726. Other cycles hold only the remainder. The facts do not explain why the string is concentrated in 2012; they only locate the dollars.
Is this the same as the Real Estate occupation page?
No. Baron Real Estate is a named employer key. The generic Real Estate grouping is a different row with different totals. Mixing them would blend four donors with hundreds of occupation-string donors.
What is the average 2012 gift for this key?
About $293,077 per contribution ($3,810,000 ÷ 13) and about $952,500 per donor ($3,810,000 ÷ 4). Those are arithmetic on the cycle facts, not a statement of contribution-limit strategy.

FEC.gov individual contribution aggregates by employer/industry grouping and election cycle.