Baron Real Estate contributions received by BLOOMFIELD FOR CONGRESS

Baron Real Estate meeting Bloomfield for Congress

BARON REAL ESTATE is the grouped employer key. BLOOMFIELD FOR CONGRESS is committee C00516641. This page reports itemized individual gifts that carried both labels. The $3,825,826 figure is the intersection. A 98.3% share of an employer grouping landing at one candidate committee is a concentrated cell. Concentration describes the indexed overlap, not a finding that the brokerage directed every gift.

Filers who typed Baron, a longer legal name, or REAL ESTATE as an occupation without this employer string sit in other keys. WEB SERVICE CO is a different employer grouping that also has a Bloomfield for Congress join; those dollars are not this $3,825,826. This page stays on BARON REAL ESTATE as indexed.

Ninety-eight percent of the Baron Real Estate grouping

The BARON REAL ESTATE grouping shows $3,893,726 in itemized individual money. The Bloomfield for Congress cell is $3,825,826, or about 98.3% of that total ($3,825,826 ÷ $3,893,726). About 1.7% of Baron Real Estate-coded receipts went to other committees. That leftover is $67,900 ($3,893,726 − $3,825,826). Those leftover dollars are on the industry hub.

A 98.3% share is not proof that every person associated with the employer gave, or that Bloomfield for Congress received only this employer’s money. The committee overlay includes other employers. The 98.3% figure applies to this spelling only.

39 contributions and a $98,098 mean

BLOOMFIELD FOR CONGRESS received $3,825,826 from BARON REAL ESTATE-coded receipts across 39 contributions. Dividing dollars by gifts gives about $98,098 per contribution ($3,825,826 ÷ 39). A 39-line cell with a five-figure-to-six-figure mean is a sparse, high-dollar pattern, not a payroll-PAC file.

Repeat givers raise the contribution count. The packet does not publish a unique-donor figure. Thirty-nine lines is not a headcount of real-estate staff. Candidate-committee contribution limits and reporting rules are not restated here; the packet supplies the join totals only.

A brokerage string is not a housing award

Real-estate names appear in HUD, GSA lease, and other USAspending records. Those award dollars are not these candidate-committee gifts. This join does not claim that Bloomfield for Congress receipts funded federal housing or lease awards, or that awards funded the receipts. FEC and USAspending share a sector word, not a cash pipeline.

Motive is outside the packet. Unitemized gifts never appear. Correlation between a real-estate employer string and a candidate committee is a reporting pattern, not causation of housing-policy outcomes.

Pages that keep the employer and the campaign apart

The Baron Real Estate industry page keeps the $3,893,726 grouping and the other committees that received the remaining 1.7%. The Bloomfield for Congress page keeps C00516641. All industries ranks other real-estate keys. All FEC ties lists neighboring cells, including any other employer strings that also join to C00516641, without stacking those dollars into this 39-line cell.

The leftover $67,900 is Baron Real Estate-coded money that did not go to Bloomfield for Congress. Small next to a 98.3% share, but not zero. Cite $3,825,826, 39 contributions, C00516641, and the $3,893,726 grouping. Keep both sides named.

How to cite Baron Real Estate × Bloomfield for Congress

A complete claim names BARON REAL ESTATE and BLOOMFIELD FOR CONGRESS, then $3,825,826, 39 itemized lines, C00516641, and 98.3% of the $3,893,726 grouping, source FEC.gov. Do not convert 39 lines into 39 unique people. Do not add Web Service Co’s Bloomfield cell. Do not fold HUD or lease awards into the cell.

Independent expenditures are omitted. The committee hub is more than these 39 rows. The industry hub is $67,900 larger than this cell. Quote FEC.gov for the overlap only.

REAL ESTATE as an occupation string is a different hub from BARON REAL ESTATE as an employer key. This join is the employer × BLOOMFIELD FOR CONGRESS cell: $3,825,826, 39 lines, C00516641, 98.3% of $3,893,726. Web Service Co’s Bloomfield join is a neighbor, not a summand. HUD and GSA lease awards that mention a similar brokerage name are USAspending objects. Thirty-nine lines at about $98,098 each are a sparse, high-dollar pattern. Unique donors are unpublished. Quote FEC.gov. Keep both sides of the name whenever the dollars are cited.

C00516641 is the recipient ID. Unitemized gifts stay omitted. The $98,098 mean travels with the 98.3% share of $3,893,726.

Questions

How much did Baron Real Estate-coded donors give Bloomfield for Congress?

FEC.gov aggregates show $3,825,826 in itemized individual contributions grouped to BARON REAL ESTATE and received by BLOOMFIELD FOR CONGRESS (C00516641). That join covers 39 contributions. The employer grouping across all committees is $3,893,726. These figures are not independent expenditures.

What share of Baron Real Estate FEC money went to this committee?

About 98.3% of the $3,893,726 BARON REAL ESTATE total is in this join: $3,825,826 to C00516641. The leftover $67,900 went to other committees. A near-total share describes overlap, not a finding that the employer directed every gift.

Is this the same money as Web Service Co to Bloomfield for Congress?

No. WEB SERVICE CO is a different employer grouping with its own join to C00516641. This page reports only BARON REAL ESTATE-coded receipts: $3,825,826 across 39 contributions. Stacking employer strings would blur both cells.

Do these gifts fund federal housing or lease awards?

No. FEC individual contributions and USAspending obligations are different datasets. Sharing a real-estate name does not create a funding pipeline. This tie reports only the employer–committee intersection on itemized individual receipts.