Blount Bros. political contributions from Montgomery, AL

What the Blount Bros. × Montgomery overlap is

Two stored strings produce $21,650: city MONTGOMERY (AL) and grouping BLOUNT BROS.. 12 itemized receipts and 1 donor survive both filters. $39,640,509 is the city dimension with the industry filter removed (106,362 city-field contributions). $21,650 is 0.05% of that city book.

This is not a restatement of Montgomery, AL, which mixes every employer string. It is not a restatement of Blount Bros., which mixes every city. 12 rows exist only at the intersection. Correlation is not causation: an employer field plus a city field does not prove why someone gave or whom they supported.

Montgomery is stored as MONTGOMERY in Alabama; Birmingham is a different city key. BLOUNT BROS. is an exact employer/industry string on the itemization, not a NAICS sector and not every person who works in a related job. Source: FEC.gov individual contribution aggregates by donor city and employer/industry grouping.

What the Montgomery, AL city book holds

On the city side, MONTGOMERY in AL indexes $39,640,509 of itemized individual dollars on 106,362 city-field lines. The Blount Bros. slice is $21,650 (0.05%). The complement inside the city book used other stored groupings. 106,362 is a city-wide contribution count, not a unique-resident count.

Montgomery is stored as MONTGOMERY in Alabama; Birmingham is a different city key. Keep state AL on the name so Montgomery is not merged with a same-named place elsewhere. Donor city is not recipient city. Committees that received the $21,650 can file anywhere.

What BLOUNT BROS. means on the tape

BLOUNT BROS. is an exact employer/industry string on the itemization, not a NAICS sector and not every person who works in a related job. 1 donor and 12 receipts follow that exact-match rule. LobbyVault does not map the field to a standardized occupation list or a company tree. Blank, abbreviated, and alternate spellings are other keys.

Mean about $1,804 per receipt and $21,650 per donor are $21,650/12 and $21,650/1. They are not typical pay and not a median gift. A single harvested donor is the harvested headcount for this join, not employment in Montgomery.

This URL (/ties/blount-bros-donors-in-al-montgomery/) is only Blount Bros. in Montgomery, AL. The city hub still mixes every employer string into $39,640,509. The industry hub still mixes every city. This JSON is the intersection copy only.

Unitemized gifts and other FEC files

Omitted: unitemized individual gifts, independent expenditures, committee-to-committee transfers, and non-individual sources. Omitted: every city except MONTGOMERY. Omitted: every grouping except BLOUNT BROS.. Included: $21,650 on 12 receipts from 1 donor.

An AL address does not mean the recipient was an Alabama candidate. Donor city is not recipient city. $21,650 is not allocated by office or party on this page. Those splits are not in the packet.

Raw integers behind the prose: grouping dollars 21,650, grouping receipts 12, harvested donors 1, city dollars 39,640,509, city-field contributions 106,362. Share 0.05% uses only the two dollar totals. Remainder of the city book is $39,618,859 (99.9%).

How to cite the pair

Citation template: employer/industry grouping BLOUNT BROS., contributor city Montgomery, AL, $21,650 on 12 itemized individual contributions from 1 donor, against a city-wide $39,640,509 on 106,362 contributions (0.05% of city dollars). Source: FEC.gov individual contribution aggregates indexed on LobbyVault. City labels are filer-entered.

Then send the reader to the live Montgomery, AL hub, the Blount Bros. industry page, Alabama campaign finance, and All FEC ties. This prose is a packet snapshot. If a later extract disagrees, FEC.gov and the live hubs control.

Per-receipt mean about $1,804 is 21,650/12. Per-donor mean about $21,650 is 21,650/1. Receipts (12) and donors (1) differ when the same harvested donor appears on more than one itemized line. Both counts are packet facts.

Montgomery × Blount Bros.: dollars versus rows

Dollars and rows can move in different directions in other joins; here they are simply $21,650 and 12 for the grouping, $39,640,509 and 106,362 for the city. 0.05% uses dollars. A receipt share would use 12 and 106,362 as a raw ratio of packet counts, still not unique people.

A single harvested donor produced the grouping file in Montgomery. Repeat itemizations explain why receipts (12) and donors (1) can differ. Both numbers are in the packet; both should be quoted.

Alabama pages still mix Montgomery with every other AL city and mix BLOUNT BROS. with every other grouping. This tie does not. A citation that names $21,650 must also name Montgomery, AL and Blount Bros., or it has described a hub.

Questions

How much did Blount Bros. donors in Montgomery, AL give?

Itemized FEC individual contributions storing industry grouping BLOUNT BROS. and city MONTGOMERY total $21,650 across 12 receipts from 1 donor in this extract. That is the city-and-industry join, not Montgomery, AL's all-industry book of $39,640,509 on 106,362 contributions. Original reports remain on FEC.gov. Labels are filer-entered.

Does Blount Bros. in Montgomery include every related job title?

No. BLOUNT BROS. is the exact stored string on the itemization. Other employer spellings, parent names, and related job titles are other keys and are omitted from $21,650. 1 donor and 12 receipts follow that exact-match rule. LobbyVault does not map the field to a standardized occupation list or NAICS sector.

What share of Montgomery, AL itemized money is Blount Bros.?

$21,650 is 0.05% of the $39,640,509 Montgomery, AL city book (106,362 city-field contributions). A thin share usually means other employer strings dominate the city tape, not that the grouping is absent from Montgomery. Quote both dollars when citing the join. Do not upgrade 0.05% into a sector ranking or an Alabama share.

Do Blount Bros. donations in Montgomery fund federal spending there?

No. These figures are FEC individual contributions, not USAspending awards. $21,650 does not become a contract or assistance award because both datasets can mention Montgomery. Different statutes, different forms. This packet has no obligation dollars and no award counts. Filings remain on FEC.gov.