Skip to main content
← All data ties

Boeing contributions received by THE BOEING COMPANY PAC

$7,529,432 in itemized individual contributions is the join between the BOEING employer grouping and THE BOEING COMPANY PAC (C00142711). That cell covers 136,536 contributions from FEC.gov individual filings. The employer grouping totals $14,415,064; this connected PAC is about 52% of the one-word Boeing string, not Boeing’s contract obligations and not every filer who typed BOEING COMMERCIAL or a site name.

Key figures

  • THE BOEING COMPANY PAC received $7,529,432 from BOEING-coded individual gifts across 136,536 contributions.
  • The BOEING employer grouping totals $14,415,064, so this PAC is about 52% of that labeled money.
  • About $55 per contribution is the mean of 136,536 itemized lines, not a unique-employee count.
  • The join does not link PAC receipts to USAspending awards or to independent expenditures.

One-word BOEING meeting The Boeing Company PAC

BOEING is the grouped employer key as a single word. THE BOEING COMPANY PAC is committee C00142711. This page reports itemized individual gifts that carried both labels. The $7,529,432 figure is the intersection. Name overlap is expected for a connected PAC. Expected overlap is why the join is written out instead of assumed.

The one-word brand is not BOEING COMPANY, BOEING COMMERCIAL AIRPLANES, or a Defense-site spelling. Those longer strings, if stored, are other rows. The PAC is a separate FEC document from the company’s corporate filings. Individual contributions remain personal gifts even when the PAC name matches the employer.

One hundred thirty-six thousand five hundred thirty-six contributions is a high-volume PAC file. Line count is not employee headcount.

Half the Boeing grouping, half elsewhere

The BOEING grouping shows $14,415,064 in itemized individual money. The company PAC cell is $7,529,432, or about 52% of that total. About 48% of BOEING-coded individual receipts went to other committees — candidates, parties, or other PACs. Those leftover dollars are nearly as large as this cell.

A 52% share means the connected PAC is a slim majority of the one-word string, not the whole map. The industry hub is required to see the other $6,885,632 ($14,415,064 minus $7,529,432).

136,536 contributions and a $55 mean

THE BOEING COMPANY PAC received $7,529,432 from BOEING-coded receipts across 136,536 contributions. Dividing dollars by gifts gives about $55 per contribution. High line counts and low means are common when payroll-style PAC deductions are itemized over many cycles.

Repeat givers raise the contribution count. The packet does not publish a unique-donor figure. The committee overlay for C00142711 also includes receipts whose employer field did not group to the one-word BOEING key.

Aerospace employer strings and USAspending

Boeing is a major federal contractor in USAspending data. Those award dollars are not these PAC gifts. This join does not claim that THE BOEING COMPANY PAC funded contracts, or that contracts funded PAC contributions. FEC and USAspending share a company name and nothing else in this table.

The employer field can lag a retirement, a subsidiary, or a joint-venture badge. Correlation between an aerospace employer string and a connected PAC is a reporting pattern, not causation of procurement outcomes.

Pages that keep the brand and the PAC from merging

The Boeing industry page keeps the $14,415,064 grouping and the other committees that received the remaining 48%. The PAC page keeps C00142711. All industries ranks other aerospace keys. All FEC ties lists other employer-committee cells so this connected-PAC join is not mistaken for independent expenditures or for contract totals.

The leftover $6,885,632 ($14,415,064 minus $7,529,432) is BOEING-coded individual money that did not go to THE BOEING COMPANY PAC. That remainder is almost as large as the PAC cell. A 52% share is a slim majority, not a monopoly. About $55 per contribution is $7,529,432 divided by 136,536 — a scale check against thin super PAC means in the same ties index.

Slim-majority connected PAC versus the rest of the brand

Connected PACs are often assumed to be the whole employer story. For the one-word BOEING key they are not: 48% of $14,415,064 went elsewhere. Candidate committees and other PACs in that remainder are on the industry hub. Quoting only C00142711 understates the string. Quoting only $14,415,064 hides the PAC's 136,536-line file.

BOEING COMPANY and BOEING COMMERCIAL AIRPLANES, if stored, are other keys. Unitemized gifts are omitted. Independent expenditures are omitted. USAspending contract dollars that mention Boeing are omitted. Quote $7,529,432 of $14,415,064 into C00142711 across 136,536 itemized lines, and keep the one-word brand from merging with longer legal names. Keep the one-word BOEING key in the citation so BOEING COMPANY, if indexed, remains a separate row. The 136,536-line count belongs next to $7,529,432. The leftover 48% of $14,415,064 is other committees on the industry hub, not a rounding error.

Questions

How much did Boeing-coded donors give The Boeing Company PAC?
FEC.gov aggregates show $7,529,432 in itemized individual contributions grouped to BOEING and received by THE BOEING COMPANY PAC (C00142711). That join covers 136,536 contributions. The employer grouping across all committees is $14,415,064. These figures are not independent expenditures.
What share of Boeing FEC individual money went to this PAC?
About 52% of the $14,415,064 BOEING total is in this join: $7,529,432 to C00142711. About 48% went to other committees. A slim majority describes overlap, not a finding that the company directed every gift.
Is this Boeing corporate political spending?
No. The total is itemized individual contributions whose employer text grouped to BOEING and whose recipient is C00142711. Corporate treasury activity and independent expenditures are other FEC categories. The join does not merge those documents.
Do these PAC gifts fund Boeing federal contracts?
No. FEC individual contributions and USAspending obligations are different datasets. Sharing an employer name does not create a funding pipeline. This tie reports only the employer-committee intersection on itemized individual receipts.

FEC.gov aggregates of itemized individual contributions grouped by employer/industry and recipient committee. Not independent expenditures.