Business Development × 2010: occupation-cycle join

$235,429 as the Business Development–2010 headline

Business Development in 2010 is $235,429 on 253 itemized lines from 129 people in the unique-donor roll-up. 2010 is a thin slice of Business Development occupation dollars: 3.6% ($235,429 of $6,454,275). The occupation hub is much larger than this one cycle. FEC.gov individual contribution aggregates, grouped by self-reported occupation and election cycle, are the source.

253 contributions from 129 donors is moderate repeat itemization inside the cycle filter. Unique-donor count collapses multiple gifts by the same person inside this occupation-cycle pair. It does not verify that those 129 people still used that title after 2010. Sales, partnerships, and BD titles can overlap in self-descriptions. This cell keeps BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT and does not merge those siblings.

This page is not a restatement of the Business Development hub or of the 2010 cycle hub. The occupation hub is every cycle. The cycle hub is every occupation. The tie is the intersection: $235,429.

Business Development across cycles versus this 2010 slice

Filers who typed business development produced the all-cycle occupation total of $6,454,275. BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT is a function title, closer to a department word than a rank. Business development manager and sales remain other keys. The join does not assign employers, product lines, or quota. The occupation is not a NAICS sales-sector total, a CRM headcount, or a merge with SALES.

Business Development itemization inside the 2010 FEC window

The 2010 election cycle hub holds itemized individual receipts for every occupation coded to that even-year window. This tie keeps only Business Development. $235,429 is therefore not a cycle-wide total. FEC.gov labels this even-year federal window 2010. A midterm FEC window. It is not a 2008 presidential window and not a 2012 presidential cycle.

253 contributions from 129 donors is moderate repeat itemization inside the cycle filter. About 2.0 itemized rows per donor is a filing ratio. Mean per receipt about $931; mean per donor about $1,825. Those means are arithmetic on the 2010 cell only. The packet has no median, no party split, and no employer table. Unitemized federal gifts never enter $235,429. Three numbers define the Business Development × 2010 cell: dollars $235,429, contribution rows 253, unique donors 129. Share of occupation dollars is 3.6% of $6,454,275.

Occupation plus cycle is not causation

Matching Business Development with 2010 does not measure influence, does not assign party, and does not say Business Development donors caused an electoral result. Correlation between an occupation string and a cycle is not causation. The table is also not a NAICS sales-sector total, a CRM headcount, or a merge with SALES.

Itemized individual contributions from FEC.gov only. Independent expenditures, unitemized gifts, and state-office campaigns are excluded. Occupation labels are filer-entered. BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT is a function title, closer to a department word than a rank. Business development manager and sales remain other keys. The join does not assign employers, product lines, or quota. Campaign gifts and federal awards remain separate public records. This page does not claim that $235,429 funded USAspending obligations. If a reader only needs the occupation, the Business Development donations hub is $6,454,275; the 2010 election cycle hub is the even-year inventory across titles. Do not add those hubs together.

Linked Business Development and 2010 tables

Business Development donations holds the $6,454,275 occupation total. The 2010 election cycle page holds every occupation in that window, not only Business Development. All occupations places BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT beside other titles without merging sibling strings (BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT MANAGER, SALES, and BD). All FEC ties lists other occupation-cycle pairs so $235,429 is not added to a different year.

Use the occupation hub for all-cycle Business Development dollars ($6,454,275). Use the 2010 cycle hub for the even-year window across titles. Use this tie for the intersection only: $235,429, 253 contributions, 129 donors, 3.6% of occupation dollars. Those four internal links are the only hrefs this copy may use.

BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT spelling and 2010

The occupation key is BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT as stored. Nearby spellings (BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT MANAGER, SALES, and BD) are not recoded into this join. 2010 is the cycle key. Those two keys yield $235,429.

If a later FEC extract restates itemized receipts, the Commission filing controls. This snapshot is the occupation-cycle pair Business Development × 2010: 253 contributions, 129 donors, $235,429.

Questions

How much did Business Development-labeled donors give in 2010?

The Business Development grouping’s 2010 cell is $235,429 in itemized individual contributions, from 253 contributions and 129 donors, per FEC.gov aggregates. That is the occupation-cycle join, not a PAC total and not the $6,454,275 all-cycle occupation total.

Is Business Development a NAICS industry total?

No. BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT here is an occupation string on individual contributions, not a NAICS sector roll-up. The 2010 cycle filter on Business Development is $235,429, 253 contributions, and 129 donors. The occupation total across cycles is $6,454,275. Labels are filer-entered on FEC.gov itemized receipts.

What share of Business Development FEC money fell in 2010?

About 3.6%. $235,429 divided by $6,454,275 is the 2010 cell’s share of the lifetime occupation bucket. Other cycles hold about 96.4% ($6,218,846) on the occupation hub. See the Business Development occupation hub for other cycles and the 2010 cycle hub for other strings.

Does Business Development 2010 money fund federal awards?

No. These figures are FEC individual contribution aggregates. Federal awards are published by USAspending. This page does not claim that campaign gifts funded those awards. $235,429 is itemized receipts tagged BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT in 2010, not an obligation total. Occupation labels are filer-entered.