Skip to main content
← All data ties

Business Representative money in the 2010 FEC cycle

$277,564 in itemized individual contributions is the FEC.gov join between occupation BUSINESS REPRESENTATIVE and the 2010 election cycle. That cell covers 742 contributions from 408 donors. The occupation’s all-cycle total is $5,630,964, so 2010 is 4.9% of the labeled roll. This page is the occupation-and-cycle match, not a union-steward census, a chamber-staff payroll, or a labor PAC.

Key figures

  • $277,564 joins the Business Representative occupation string to the 2010 FEC cycle.
  • 742 contributions from 408 donors produced that cell.
  • 2010 is about 4.9% of the occupation’s $5,630,964 lifetime total.
  • BUSINESS REPRESENTATIVE is a filer-entered title, not a union-steward census.
  • FEC itemized receipts are not USAspending awards.

Business Representative as occupation, 2010 as the cycle

Two FEC fields define the cell: occupation BUSINESS REPRESENTATIVE and election cycle 2010. Matching rows sum to $277,564, 742 contributions, and 408 donors. BUSINESS REPRESENTATIVE in 2010 is a two-word title that can mean labor, sales, or association work. FEC.gov does not assign which reading applies. The occupation hub is $5,630,964 across every cycle in the aggregate. The 2010 cycle hub mixes every other occupation that used that year. Neither hub restates this intersection; this tie page exists because the two dimensions meet.

2010’s dollar share is 4.9% ($277,564 of $5,630,964). The remainder, $5,353,400, sits in other cycles on the occupation hub (95.1%). Hundreds of donor keys and more than seven hundred lines is a high-volume title cell in a midterm window, denser than most occupation-cycle pages in this slice. Correlation between a job title and a two-year FEC window is a reporting overlap, not causation of an election outcome. Itemized individual receipts are the coverage. Unitemized money never appears in $277,564.

A two-word title that does not encode union versus sales

$5,630,964 is the occupation-side denominator. It is not limited to 2010. Sibling strings (UNION REPRESENTATIVE, BUSINESS AGENT, and REPRESENTATIVE) stay on other pages. Adding those keys to $5,630,964 would be a researcher-built recode, not this table. Occupation labels are filer-entered on itemized individual receipts. The occupation is not a union-steward census, a chamber-staff payroll, or a labor PAC.

Open Business Representative donations for the $5,630,964 roll. Open the 2010 election cycle hub for every occupation in that window. All occupations and All FEC ties place this pair beside other occupation-cycle pages without combining dollar figures. Union representative and business agent remain other keys. This page does not recode those titles into BUSINESS REPRESENTATIVE.

408 donors and a high line count

The 2010 election cycle hub holds itemized individual receipts for every occupation coded to that even-year window. This tie keeps only Business Representative. $277,564 is therefore not a cycle-wide total. FEC.gov labels this even-year federal window 2010. A midterm FEC window. It is not a 2008 presidential window and not a 2012 presidential cycle.

742 itemized lines from 408 unique donors is about 1.8 receipts per donor. Mean per line about $374; mean per donor about $680. About 1.8 itemized rows per donor is a filing ratio. The packet has no median, no party split, and no employer table. Unitemized federal gifts never enter $277,564. Hundreds of donor keys and more than seven hundred lines is a high-volume title cell in a midterm window, denser than most occupation-cycle pages in this slice.

What Business Representative dollars in 2010 are not

Matching Business Representative with 2010 does not measure influence, does not assign party, and does not say Business Representative donors caused an electoral result. Correlation between an occupation string and a cycle is not causation. The table is also not a union-steward census, a chamber-staff payroll, or a labor PAC.

Itemized individual contributions from FEC.gov only. Independent expenditures, unitemized gifts, and state-office campaigns are excluded. Occupation labels are filer-entered. A high line count relative to dollars can mean many modest itemized gifts. That pattern is a row count, not a motive. Campaign gifts and federal awards remain separate public records. This page does not claim that $277,564 funded USAspending obligations.

How to cite Business Representative × 2010

A complete claim names Business Representative and 2010, then $277,564, 742 contributions, 408 donors, and 4.9% of $5,630,964, source FEC.gov. Do not convert 408 keys into licensed or employed practitioners. Do not fold independent expenditures or USAspending awards into the cell. Keep both sides of the name—Business Representative and 2010—whenever the dollars are quoted. Mean gift $374 and mean per donor $680 travel with those counts; they do not travel with a licensing board.

Occupation hub, 2010 hub, and Business Agent as a sibling

Business Representative donations holds the $5,630,964 occupation total. The 2010 election cycle page holds every occupation in that window, not only Business Representative. All occupations places BUSINESS REPRESENTATIVE beside other titles without merging sibling strings (UNION REPRESENTATIVE, BUSINESS AGENT, and REPRESENTATIVE). All FEC ties lists other occupation-cycle pairs so $277,564 is not added to a different year. Those four internal links are the only hrefs this copy may use.

The occupation hub still holds $5,353,400 (95.1%) outside 2010. Most of the $5,630,964 roll is not this cycle’s cell. Union representative and business agent remain other keys. This page does not recode those titles into BUSINESS REPRESENTATIVE. Gifts per donor in 2010 average about 1.8. That ratio is 742 divided by 408, not a measure of turnout. Quote both keys: Business Representative and 2010. Quote the dollars: $277,564. Quote the volume: 742 contributions, 408 donors. Quote the source: FEC.gov.

Questions

How much did Business Representative-labeled donors give in 2010?
The Business Representative grouping’s 2010 cell is $277,564 in itemized individual contributions, from 742 contributions and 408 donors, per FEC.gov aggregates. That is the occupation-cycle join, not a PAC total and not the $5,630,964 all-cycle occupation total. Occupation labels are filer-entered.
Does Business Representative mean a union business agent?
Not necessarily. BUSINESS REPRESENTATIVE is the occupation string as typed. FEC aggregates do not encode union versus sales versus association work. The 2010 cycle filter on Business Representative is $277,564, 742 contributions, and 408 donors. The occupation total across cycles is $5,630,964.
What share of Business Representative FEC money fell in 2010?
About 4.9%. $277,564 divided by $5,630,964 is the 2010 cell’s share of the lifetime occupation bucket. Other cycles hold about 95.1% ($5,353,400) on the occupation hub. See the Business Representative occupation hub for other cycles and the 2010 cycle hub for other strings.
Does Business Representative 2010 money fund federal awards?
No. These figures are FEC individual contribution aggregates. Federal awards are published by USAspending. This page does not claim that campaign gifts funded those awards. $277,564 is itemized receipts tagged BUSINESS REPRESENTATIVE in 2010, not an obligation total. Cite the 2010 intersection as $277,564 and 742 contributions from 408 donors, not the $5,630,964 occupation total.

FEC.gov individual contribution aggregates by self-reported occupation and election cycle. Occupation labels are filer-entered.