Businessman political contributions from Golden, CO
$14,200 is one BUSINESSMAN donor in Golden, CO across 11 FEC receipts. Goldenβs unfiltered city total is $24,169,646 on 52,107 contributions. Eleven lines and one donor is a repeat-gift shape. BUSINESSMAN is a filer-typed occupation grouping, not a registry of every owner in Golden.
Key figures
- $14,200 is the Businessman overlap inside Golden, CO.
- City book $24,169,646; join share under 0.1%.
- Means β $1,291 / receipt and $14,200 / donor.
- Not a PAC IE total and not a federal award.
- Original reports remain on FEC.gov.
What Businessman in Golden is not
This page is a join. One dimension is contributor city Golden, CO. The other is occupation or industry grouping Businessman (stored as BUSINESSMAN). $14,200 is the intersection β dollars on receipts that carry both labels. $24,169,646 is the city bucket before the employer filter, built from 52,107 itemized lines. The harvested donor count inside the intersection is 1 donor, not a census of everyone in Golden tied to a related trade.
11 contributions from 1 donor produced $14,200. Repeat gifts add receipts; 1 donor is the headcount in this extract for the join, not a census of everyone in Golden tied to that label. Arithmetic mean per receipt is about $1,291; per donor, about $14,200. Those means are division of packet facts, not typical salaries and not medians.
Do not add $14,200 to $24,169,646; the first number is already inside the second when both come from the same tape. Quote the join with both nouns so a downstream citation cannot drop a side.
The relationship and the headline number
Golden indexes $24,169,646 on 52,107 itemized individual contributions. City labels are filer-entered. A suburb that types a different city never enters $24,169,646. Joint-fundraising and committee addresses that happen to list Golden can sit in the same bucket as residents. The packet does not publish a unique-donor count for the city as a whole, so this page does not invent one from 52,107.
52,107 is a contribution-line count, not a donor census and not a household count. Repeat itemizations and joint filings can add lines. This page therefore refuses to divide $24,169,646 by 52,107 and call the quotient a typical Golden gift. The only means published here use the join integers 11 and 1.
Golden, CO as a filer-entered city label
The Businessman industry hub is the same stored string in every city, not a Colorado-only table. $14,200 is the Golden, CO slice of that string on this packet. A donor in another city who stored BUSINESSMAN is not in this join. A donor in Golden who stored a different employer string is not in this join either. This packet publishes the join dollars as $14,200 with 11 contributions and 1 donor.
If you need Businessman in a single even-year window, that is an industry-cycle join, not this file. If you need cycle cuts of Golden, those are city-cycle joins. This file stays on one city and one stored string.
Businessman as an employer/occupation string
Motive is not a field. Party split is not a field in this packet. Missing fields stay missing. Do not read $14,200 as evidence that Businessman controls Golden politics. The join is two fields. Correlation is not causation.
Researchers citing the join should keep both nouns in the sentence: Businessman and Golden, CO. Dropping either noun turns this page into a restatement of a hub it is not. $14,200 across 11 receipts from 1 donor is the only overlap this extract published.
Different disclosure systems
A usable footnote names Businessman, Golden, CO, $14,200, 11 receipts, and 1 donor. The compact headline $14,200 is that same dollar total. It is not a second extract. The implied means near $1,291 and $14,200 are packet quotients.
Prefer the live tables if the overlay or hub has refreshed after an ingest. Golden, CO still includes every other employer string tagged to Golden. Businessman is the grouping without the Golden filter. All FEC ties indexes other pairs. Do not add those parents into $14,200.
A usable footnote for researchers
Campaign receipts and federal awards are different statutes even when both mention Golden. This packet has no obligation dollars. Keep the contribution label on $14,200. Original reports remain on FEC.gov.
Keep the contribution label on the join dollars. $14,200 does not measure Golden politics, Colorado elections, or federal awards. The city parent remains a larger table than the labeled slice. Researchers should quote itemized individual contributions, not outlays, and should not convert the donor headcount into a labor-market statistic. FEC.gov remains the originating system for every figure on this page. City labels are filer-entered.
Keep the contribution label on the join dollars. $14,200 does not measure Golden politics, Colorado elections, or federal awards. The city parent remains a larger table than the labeled slice. Researchers should quote itemized individual contributions, not outlays, and should not convert the donor headcount into a labor-market statistic. FEC.gov remains the originating system for every figure on this page. City labels are filer-entered.
One BUSINESSMAN donor and eleven receipts produced $14,200 in Golden. Colorado campaign finance is the state door. All FEC ties lists other occupation-city pages. Do not upgrade one harvested donor into a chamber-of-commerce roster.
Questions
- What overlap exists between Businessman and Golden, CO?
- Cite occupation or industry grouping Businessman, city Golden, CO, $14,200, 11 receipts, 1 donor, against city-wide $24,169,646 on 52,107 lines (under 0.1%). Source: FEC.gov. Then link Golden, CO, Businessman, Colorado campaign finance, and All FEC ties. Keep both Businessman and Golden, CO in the citation. Source: FEC.gov individual contribution aggregates. City labels are filer-entered.
- Why keep both Businessman and Golden in the sentence?
- No. under 0.1% is $14,200 divided by $24,169,646, not a ranked list of Golden employers. The packet does not publish other employer totals for comparison. Do not invent a ranking from one cell. Keep both Businessman and Golden, CO in the citation. Source: FEC.gov individual contribution aggregates. City labels are filer-entered.
- Are committee street addresses in the Golden bucket?
- This extract harvested 1 donor for BUSINESSMAN inside Golden, CO. That is a Schedule A headcount, not a license roster or an employment census. 11 receipts can exceed the donor count when the same people give more than once. Do not treat 1 as everyone who ever used a related title.
- Where do original Businessman itemizations live?
- Use the Golden, CO city hub, the Businessman industry hub, Colorado campaign finance, and All FEC ties. Original itemizations remain on FEC.gov. This guide quotes $14,200, 11 receipts, 1 donor, and $24,169,646. The join is not a federal-award trail. Keep both Businessman and Golden, CO in the citation. Source: FEC.gov individual contribution aggregates. City labels are filer-entered.
FEC.gov individual contribution aggregates by donor city and employer/industry grouping. City labels are filer-entered.