Hillsborough, CA political money — 2012 cycle

How Hillsborough, CA meets the 2012 election cycle

$233,957 is the overlap of two FEC dimensions: contributor city HILLSBOROUGH with state CA, and election cycle 2012. LobbyVault stores that join so a reader can open the Hillsborough, CA city hub and the 2012 election cycle hub without treating either page as a substitute for this one. The city hub answers how much itemized money this city string has produced across cycles. The cycle hub answers how much itemized money that two-year federal window produced nationally. This page answers only the intersection: Hillsborough, CA in 2012.

242 is a receipt count for that intersection, not a unique-donor census. A person who gave twice is two lines. A PAC or joint-fundraising address that stored HILLSBOROUGH is in the same city field as a household street. Arithmetic mean per line is about $967 ($233,957 ÷ 242). That mean is division, not a typical resident and not a median.

2012 is a presidential election cycle. That calendar label does not explain $233,957. This packet does not carry party splits, committee names, or occupation mix for the join. Cite the two packet dollars — $233,957 for the 2012 slice and $38.5 million for the Hillsborough, CA book — and stop before assigning motive.

The Hillsborough, CA side of the join

Across cycles in this extract, contributor city HILLSBOROUGH in California totals $38.5 million ($38,546,671). $233,957 is 0.6% of that city book. A small share does not mean 2012 was quiet in Hillsborough; it means later or earlier cycles in the same city string can dwarf a single window. The remaining $38,312,714 in the city book sits in other even-year tags. The live Hillsborough, CA table is the place to compare other years. This snapshot lists one cycle.

The stored city sits in San Mateo County, California. Burlingame, San Mateo, and Atherton — those Peninsula neighbors are separate FEC city keys and are not rolled into HILLSBOROUGH. State CA stays on the citation so Hillsborough is not merged with a same-named place in another state. A repeated city name under another state code is a different FEC key. $38.5 million is the CA key only. Donor city is not recipient city: committees that received these gifts can file from anywhere in the FEC system.

The 2012 cycle side for California filers in Hillsborough

Federal election cycles are two-year windows on FEC.gov. The 2012 cycle is not a calendar year of January gifts only; it is the Commission's cycle tag on itemized receipts. 242 Hillsborough, CA lines in that window produced $233,957. National 2012 activity — every city — lives on the 2012 election cycle hub, not here. A presidential label marks the even-year window; it is not a finding about turnout in Hillsborough.

California campaign-finance pages roll up the state, including cities that are not Hillsborough. Do not add $233,957 to a state total from that hub; the state page already contains this city when the same extract is used. All FEC ties is the directory of other city-cycle and city-industry joins. None of those pages converts $233,957 into spending by Hillsborough candidates. Unitemized contributions below the FEC itemization threshold are omitted from both $233,957 and the $38.5 million city book.

What $233,957 does not measure

$233,957 is itemized federal individual contributions with contributor city HILLSBOROUGH. Unitemized gifts below the itemization threshold sit outside it. State-office campaigns in California file under state law and sit outside it. Independent-expenditure totals are a different FEC table. A candidate who lives in Hillsborough can raise money from other cities; those gifts are not this join. PAC transfers and committee-to-committee activity are other files.

City labels are filer-entered. A donor who typed HILLSBOROUGH is counted; a donor who typed a neighborhood, a firm city, or a nearby suburb is not recoded into Hillsborough. LobbyVault does not rewrite the city field into a Census place or a residency test. Treat 242 as lines that stored this string in 2012. This packet does not include a citywide row count across all cycles, so a row-share percentage is not computed.

Reading Hillsborough and 2012 together without mixing tables

Correlation is not causation. $233,957 beside $38.5 million does not mean 2012 caused the city book or that Hillsborough drove the 2012 cycle. The join is a filter: city string plus cycle tag. Amended reports can move either number. If the live Hillsborough, CA hub or the live 2012 cycle hub disagrees with this prose, the newer FEC extract controls. This snapshot is not a third disclosure system.

Internal links on this page go to Hillsborough, CA, the 2012 election cycle, California campaign finance, and All FEC ties. Use those four doors. Do not paste $233,957 into a USAspending award story; FEC receipts and federal obligations are different statutes. This packet has no award dollars, and itemized giving is not a proxy for public opinion in California.

A 0.6% cut of the Hillsborough stack

0.6% of $38.5 million is a slice, not a ranking. Put another way, $233,957 of the $38,546,671 city stack was tagged 2012, and $38,312,714 was tagged other cycles. Those percentages are $233,957 divided by $38,546,671 and $38,312,714 divided by $38,546,671. They are not shares of California totals, national cycle totals, or eligible voters. Dollar share (0.6%) and row volume (242 itemized gifts) are separate facts.

Do not treat 0.6% as Hillsborough's share of the 2012 national cycle, which is a different denominator and is not in these facts. Adjacent midterm or presidential windows for the same city string are other joins. This URL isolates Hillsborough × 2012 only: $233,957, 242 receipts, mean about $967. Source: FEC.gov individual contribution aggregates by donor city and election cycle.

Questions

How much did Hillsborough, CA donors give in 2012?

Itemized FEC individual contributions listing contributor city HILLSBOROUGH and cycle 2012 total $233,957 across 242 receipts in this LobbyVault extract. That is the city-cycle join, not the all-cycle Hillsborough, CA book of $38.5 million. Unitemized gifts and California state-office filings sit outside both figures.

Is $233,957 all of Hillsborough's federal political money?

No. $38.5 million ($38,546,671) is the all-cycle itemized book for contributor city HILLSBOROUGH in CA. The 2012 slice is $233,957, 0.6% of that book. Other cycles hold $38,312,714. 242 is a 2012 receipt count, not a unique-donor count. The city hub holds the stack; this page holds the year.

Did Hillsborough, CA 2012 donations stay in California?

Not necessarily. Donor city is Hillsborough, CA; recipients can be committees anywhere that file with the FEC. This join does not allocate the $233,957 by office, state of the committee, or party. A CA city code is an address field on the individual receipt, not a map of California races.

How many Hillsborough, CA contributions were itemized in 2012?

242 itemized contribution records sum to $233,957. That count is rows, not unique donors. The arithmetic mean is about $967 per row. Unitemized gifts below the FEC threshold and independent expenditures are not included. Citywide unique-donor counts are not in these facts.