Skip to main content
← All data ties

Santa Rosa filers to WinRed (C00694323)

Where Santa Rosa, CA meets WinRed, the extract shows $377,457. That is not $26,200,333, which is every committee under the SANTA ROSA label. That is not the committee's nationwide total, which is not in this packet. Cite FEC.gov. This page does not publish a named-donor list.

Key figures

  • WinRed from Santa Rosa, CA: $377,457 itemized individual dollars.
  • City-wide $26,200,333; complement $25,822,876.
  • Do not invent a donor list for this join.
  • Keep both nouns: Santa Rosa, CA and WinRed.
  • Source: FEC.gov city × committee aggregates.

City SANTA ROSA plus committee C00694323

Cite the pair in one sentence: Santa Rosa, CA itemized $377,457 to WinRed (C00694323), which is 1.4% of the $26,200,333 city book. Then stop. Extra dollars, extra people, and extra committees would be inventions.

The city hub still answers all-committee questions. The committee overlay still answers all-city questions. This /ties/ path answers only the intersection. Canonical path is /ties/ca-santa-rosa-to-winred/.

Santa Rosa is stored as SANTA ROSA in California; other Sonoma County city strings are other keys. Independent expenditures are excluded by the source note. USAspending awards are a different statute. Do not add $377,457 to federal spending in Santa Rosa or California.

State CA stays on the Santa Rosa citation

Same-named cities in other states are other pages. Santa Rosa, CA is the CA key only. $26,200,333 and $377,457 both carry that state. Dropping CA from a citation risks colliding with another Santa Rosa.

Santa Rosa is stored as SANTA ROSA in California; other Sonoma County city strings are other keys. The city hub for Santa Rosa, CA remains the place to see every committee. This tie isolates WinRed (C00694323).

What WinRed is not on this page

$377,457 is not WinRed's cash-on-hand, not its independent-expenditure total, and not its coordinated-expenditure total. It is itemized individual contributions from one city string. Source note: not independent expenditures.

WINRED is stored on C00694323. ActBlue and other conduit committees are other IDs. Cycle is unpublished. Party is unpublished as a packet field. Office sought is unpublished. Stick to the two dimensions that exist.

Packet slug ca-santa-rosa-to-winred is the LobbyVault filename for this Santa Rosa × WinRed join. Canonical path is /ties/ca-santa-rosa-to-winred/. Overlay the city hub and the committee hub; do not treat either hub as $377,457.

City string SANTA ROSA plus state CA plus committee C00694323 is the three-part key behind $377,457. Drop the state and a same-named city elsewhere could collide. Drop the committee and the page becomes the city hub of $26,200,333. Keep all three.

Thin slices still need both nouns

Even a 1.4% slice is a real join. $377,457 still requires both Santa Rosa, CA and WinRed (C00694323) in the sentence. Dropping either noun turns a small number into the wrong hub.

Thin shares usually mean other committees dominate the SANTA ROSA tape. That is a table result, not a finding that WinRed was absent from Santa Rosa.

Recompute the share from the raw integers: 377,457 divided by 26,200,333 is 1.4%. The complement 25,822,876 is $25,822,876, which is 98.6% of the SANTA ROSA city book. Those identities do not invent a receipt count.

FEC individual contributions are not USAspending obligations. $377,457 has no award count beside it in this packet. Do not fold $377,457 into federal spending in Santa Rosa or California. Different statutes, different forms, different tables.

Public records, not accusations

Public records, not accusations: itemized gifts from a city field to a committee ID do not assign motive. $377,457 does not prove a network. $26,200,333 does not prove Santa Rosa is a political capital. Both numbers are disclosure aggregates.

Keep the tone on the dollars. WinRed (C00694323) and Santa Rosa, CA are labels. Source: FEC.gov.

California campaign-finance coverage still includes every other CA city. This tie does not. Researchers who need a state mix should leave this URL and open the California hub. Researchers who need Santa Rosa to WinRed should stay here.

Do not invent donor names. Do not invent a unique-person count. The packet published city, committee, $377,457, and $26,200,333. That is the complete numeric payload besides stored labels SANTA ROSA and WINRED.

Adjacent hubs versus this tie

Adjacent hubs are larger sets. This tie is the subset $377,457. Use hubs for context and this page for the intersection. $26,200,333 travels with the city hub. C00694323 travels with the committee hub. Both travel with this tie.

Internal links: Santa Rosa, CA; WinRed; California campaign finance; all FEC ties. Source note matches the packet: FEC.gov aggregates of itemized individual contributions grouped by donor city and recipient committee. Not independent expenditures.

Itemized individual contributions are the only money in $377,457 and $26,200,333. PAC disbursements, party coordinated expenditures, and independent expenditures are other FEC files. Mixing those files with this join would invent a total the packet does not contain.

If a later extract revises $377,457 or $26,200,333, the live Santa Rosa, CA hub and the live WinRed hub control. This file is a packet snapshot, not a parallel disclosure system. Amended FEC reports can move either side of the join.

Questions

How much money from Santa Rosa, CA is tied to WinRed?
Itemized FEC individual contributions storing city SANTA ROSA and committee C00694323 total $377,457 in this extract. The unfiltered Santa Rosa, CA city book is $26,200,333. $377,457 is already inside $26,200,333; adding the two double-counts. Source: FEC.gov aggregates grouped by donor city and recipient committee.
Does $377,457 include independent expenditures by WinRed?
No. The source note limits the series to itemized individual contributions. Independent expenditures, electioneering communications, and committee operating expenditures are other FEC tables and are omitted from $377,457 and from $26,200,333. Cite the live WinRed file on FEC.gov for those other schedules.
Can I treat 1.4% as Santa Rosa's share of WinRed nationwide?
No. 1.4% uses $26,200,333 as the denominator — the Santa Rosa, CA city book — not the committee's all-city total, which is unpublished here. Inverting the percentage would invent a nationwide committee figure. Quote $377,457 as a city slice of WinRed (C00694323) only.
Are Santa Rosa contributions to WinRed the same as California spending?
No. FEC receipts and USAspending obligations are different datasets. $377,457 is not an award amount. Geography on a contribution line does not convert the gift into federal spending in Santa Rosa or California. This packet publishes no obligation dollars and no award counts.

FEC.gov aggregates of itemized individual contributions grouped by donor city and recipient committee. Not independent expenditures.