Skip to main content
← All data ties

Donors in Walnut Creek, CA to CLEVELAND 2016 HOST COMMITTEE INC

LobbyVault publishes $1,000,000 as the overlap of Walnut Creek, CA and CLEVELAND 2016 HOST COMMITTEE INC. FEC.gov itemized individual contribution aggregates supply the number. $26,934,936 is the city book with the committee filter off. C00567057 is required in any citation so a similarly named committee is not swapped in.

Key figures

  • $1,000,000 is the Walnut Creek, CA × CLEVELAND 2016 HOST COMMITTEE INC (C00567057) itemized join.
  • $26,934,936 is the all-committee Walnut Creek, CA book; this committee is 3.71% of that book.
  • Leftover $25,934,936 under the WALNUT CREEK city string went to other committees.
  • City labels are filer-entered; this packet is not independent expenditures.
  • Do not add $1,000,000 to USAspending or to the California hub as extra money.

Cleveland 2016 Host receipts that stored WALNUT CREEK

Schedule A lines that stored city WALNUT CREEK and committee C00567057 sum to $1,000,000 in this extract. That is the relationship this URL exists to explain. Walnut Creek, CA is not a municipal treasury. CLEVELAND 2016 HOST COMMITTEE INC is not scored here as a winner or loser. Public records, not accusations.

CLEVELAND 2016 HOST COMMITTEE INC (C00567057) received $1,000,000 from the WALNUT CREEK city string. The committee name references Cleveland; the donor-city key is California. Those two geographies are not the same filter. Walnut Creek’s leftover is $25,934,936.

A donor who stored a different city spelling is omitted from $1,000,000 even if a map would put the address near Walnut Creek. LobbyVault does not recode the field. Keep WALNUT CREEK exact when quoting the join.

Walnut Creek, CA dollars that stored other committees

$26,934,936 is every itemized individual contribution storing city WALNUT CREEK in this file, regardless of recipient. $1,000,000 is the subset whose recipient is CLEVELAND 2016 HOST COMMITTEE INC. Quote the pair. Ranking Walnut Creek against other cities is outside the packet.

The stored city sits in California. Neighboring municipalities are not absorbed into WALNUT CREEK. California campaign-finance pages include other cities. All FEC ties lists other city-committee pages. None of them converts $1,000,000 into spending by Walnut Creek, CA candidates or into independent expenditures by CLEVELAND 2016 HOST COMMITTEE INC.

Stored name CLEVELAND 2016 HOST COMMITTEE INC

C00567057 is disclosed as CLEVELAND 2016 HOST COMMITTEE INC. This page does not list independent expenditures the committee made, operating expenditures it paid, or earmark destinations beyond the labeled recipient. $1,000,000 is itemized individual receipts storing city WALNUT CREEK and committee C00567057. Other cities giving to CLEVELAND 2016 HOST COMMITTEE INC appear on the committee hub. Adding them here would break the city filter.

CLEVELAND 2016 HOST COMMITTEE INC is the recipient key, not a donor. This city-pac page does not publish a list of people in Walnut Creek. Inventing names from the committee label or from local knowledge would break the packet contract.

Share math for Walnut Creek, CA

3.71% of $26,934,936 is $1,000,000 to CLEVELAND 2016 HOST COMMITTEE INC (C00567057). That percentage describes overlap of two FEC groupings, not a finding that residents of Walnut Creek, CA as a group preferred this committee. Most of the $26,934,936 city book went to other committees. Even when 3.71% is a visible slice, the slice is still only the C00567057 filter.

The leftover $25,934,936 under the WALNUT CREEK city string went to other committees. The Walnut Creek, CA hub holds that remainder. The CLEVELAND 2016 HOST COMMITTEE INC page holds receipts whose city field did not store WALNUT CREEK. Do not stack this cell with another city’s gifts to C00567057; each join is its own filter.

State filings and unitemized gifts

Unitemized federal gifts sit outside $1,000,000. California state-office filings sit outside it. Independent expenditures are a different FEC file; the source note on this packet says these aggregates are not independent expenditures. City labels are filer-entered. PAC or joint-fundraising addresses that stored this city string follow the same rule as household streets.

Do not read $1,000,000 as proof that Walnut Creek, CA “funded” CLEVELAND 2016 HOST COMMITTEE INC as a municipal act, or that the committee spent the money in California. The join is two fields. Correlation is not causation. FEC individual contributions are not USAspending awards. This packet has no obligation dollars and no award counts. Do not add $1,000,000 to federal spending in California.

Contribution lines can cluster in a few ZIPs or spread across many. This packet does not list those ZIPs or a donor headcount. Open the city hub and the committee hub rather than guessing a postal split from the city string alone. CLEVELAND 2016 HOST COMMITTEE INC (C00567057) received $1,000,000 from the WALNUT CREEK city string. The committee name references Cleveland; the donor-city key is California. Those two geographies are not the same filter. Walnut Creek’s leftover is $25,934,936.

Using All FEC ties without mixing cells

Internal links go to Walnut Creek, CA, CLEVELAND 2016 HOST COMMITTEE INC, California campaign finance, and All FEC ties. Use those four doors. The city page holds the $26,934,936 book and the committees that received the leftover $25,934,936. The committee page holds C00567057 receipts from every city. All FEC ties collects neighboring pairs without mixing independent expenditures into this cell.

Researchers citing the join should keep both nouns in the sentence: Walnut Creek, CA and CLEVELAND 2016 HOST COMMITTEE INC (C00567057). Dropping either noun turns this page into a restatement of a hub it is not. $1,000,000 is the only overlap this extract published. A later amendment wave can move a dollar without this file rewriting itself. Treat the live LobbyVault hub as newer than this packet snapshot.

Cite $1,000,000, $26,934,936, 3.71%, leftover $25,934,936, and C00567057. Keep both sides named: WALNUT CREEK as filer-entered city, CLEVELAND 2016 HOST COMMITTEE INC as recipient. Motive is outside the packet. Unitemized gifts never appear. Live hubs override this snapshot. If the overlay disagrees, the overlay and FEC.gov control.

Questions

How much itemized money from WALNUT CREEK went to C00567057?
Itemized FEC individual contributions storing city WALNUT CREEK and recipient CLEVELAND 2016 HOST COMMITTEE INC (C00567057) total $1,000,000 in this extract. That is the join, not Walnut Creek, CA’s all-committee book of $26,934,936. These figures are not independent expenditures. Original reports remain on FEC.gov.
Are Walnut Creek and other spellings combined in $1,000,000?
No. WALNUT CREEK is the exact stored city string with state CA. Other spellings, abbreviations, and neighboring places are other keys and are omitted from $1,000,000. LobbyVault does not recode the field into a Census place. Use the Walnut Creek, CA hub for the all-committee book of $26,934,936.
What is left in WALNUT CREEK after $1,000,000 to Cleveland 2016 Host?
$1,000,000 is 3.71% of the $26,934,936 Walnut Creek, CA city book. The leftover $25,934,936 went to other committees under the same city string. Quote both dollars and the committee ID C00567057. Do not upgrade 3.71% into a ranking of civic preference.
Does this page list Walnut Creek donor names?
No. The packet publishes a dollar join, not a roster. Do not invent contributor names from the committee label CLEVELAND 2016 HOST COMMITTEE INC or from local knowledge. The Walnut Creek, CA hub and the C00567057 hub are the next public-record doors.

FEC.gov aggregates of itemized individual contributions grouped by donor city and recipient committee. Not independent expenditures.