Skip to main content
← All data ties

Cogen Technologies political money in the 2014 election cycle

The Cogen Technologies employer grouping records $2,052,900 in itemized individual contributions for the 2014 FEC cycle. Twenty-nine contribution lines from six donors make up that midterm cell. The grouping’s all-cycle total is $7,077,109, so 2014 is 29.0% of the key. This is an as-filed energy-employer string joined to a congressional year, not a cogeneration-sector census and not a utility PAC.

Key figures

  • $2,052,900 tagged Cogen Technologies in the 2014 FEC cycle.
  • 29 contributions from 6 donors; about $70,790 per contribution.
  • 2014 is 29.0% of the grouping’s $7,077,109 all-cycle total.
  • Named employer string, not an energy-sector or PAC total.
  • Source: FEC.gov individual contribution aggregates.

Six donors, 29 lines, a heavy midterm share

Six keys produced 29 lines, about 4.8 receipts per donor. Average line size is about $70,790. Average per donor is about $342,150. That mid-scale concentration sits between occupation keys with hundreds of donors and one-donor stacks. The $2,052,900 cell is still individual receipts tagged to this string, not plant output and not a rate case.

Cogen Technologies is the grouped spelling. “Cogeneration,” utility legal names, and related LLCs may sit in other keys. This join does not merge power-sector trees.

Energy-sounding employer strings still reduce to Schedule A text. Cogen Technologies × 2014 = $2,052,900 on 29 lines from 6 donors, 29.0% of $7,077,109. Six keys and about $70,790 per line is a mid-scale concentrated midterm. The table does not verify plants, fuels, or FERC dockets. The residual $5,024,209 sits in other years of this spelling. Utility PACs are committee reports, not this cell.

29.0% of the Cogen Technologies roll

Seven million seventy-seven thousand one hundred nine dollars is the grouping across all cycles. $2,052,900 is 29.0% of that. 2014 is a heavy year for this string—about three-tenths of the recorded individual money—without being the entire history. Other years hold $5,024,209. This packet does not name those years’ amounts.

The industry hub is the running total. This tie keeps the midterm cut visible with the 6-donor shape attached.

Energy-sounding name, FEC employer field only

The string suggests power generation. The table does not verify facilities, FERC dockets, or fuel mix. It counts itemized federal receipts whose employer grouped here in 2014. Speculating about energy policy motives would add content the facts do not contain.

The overlay lists recipient committees. The 2014 cycle hub places Cogen Technologies beside occupation labels and other named firms. Comparison is of cells.

Exclusions

Utility PACs, independent expenditures, and state gifts are outside $2,052,900. Department of Energy or other energy awards in USAspending are a different dataset. These itemized gifts do not fund those awards. Shared “technologies” language is not a payment chain.

Unitemized gifts are absent. Six donor keys are matching results for 2014 inside this grouping.

Related pages

The Cogen Technologies 2014 overlay is the data join. The industry hub holds $7,077,109. The 2014 election-cycle hub holds every employer string that year. The ties index holds other industry–cycle pages. Quote $2,052,900 with 6 donors, 29 lines, and the 29.0% share.

Citing Cogen Technologies × 2014

Write Cogen Technologies, 2014, $2,052,900, 29 contributions, 6 donors, 29.0% of $7,077,109, source FEC.gov individual aggregates. Do not upgrade the string into a cogeneration-sector total. Do not add other utility names. Do not add Department of Energy awards from USAspending. Shared “technologies” language is not a payment chain from these 6 donors to those awards.

The overlay lists the 29 committees. The industry hub holds $7,077,109. The 2014 cycle hub places this six-donor cell among occupation labels and other named firms. The ties index holds other joins. Independent expenditures and state gifts are outside $2,052,900. Unitemized gifts never enter the 29-line count.

A 29.0% year share is heavy for a midterm. It still leaves most of the $7,077,109 in other cycles. Quote the share with the $2,052,900 so 2014 is not mistaken for the lifetime key. Keep both sides named: Cogen Technologies and the 2014 election cycle. Motive and plant operations are outside the facts.

Six donors, 29 lines, $2,052,900, 29.0% of $7,077,109: a heavy midterm share on a modest lifetime roll. About $70,790 per line and about $342,150 per donor are arithmetic. The table does not verify generating plants. Utility PACs and DOE awards are other files. Cite Cogen Technologies and 2014 together. The overlay lists the 29 committees. Other energy names stay on other URLs.

Questions

How much FEC money is tagged Cogen Technologies in 2014?
The join records $2,052,900 in itemized individual contributions for Cogen Technologies in 2014, from 29 contributions and 6 donors. The grouping’s all-cycle total is $7,077,109.
What share of the grouping is 2014?
29.0%: $2,052,900 of $7,077,109. Other cycles hold $5,024,209. Use the industry hub for the all-years roll.
Is this a utility or energy-sector total?
No. It is one grouped employer string. Other energy names and occupation labels are other keys. PAC spending is outside the $2,052,900.
What is the average 2014 gift here?
About $70,790 per contribution ($2,052,900 ÷ 29) and about $342,150 per donor ($2,052,900 ÷ 6). Arithmetic on the cycle facts, not a strategy claim.

FEC.gov individual contribution aggregates by employer/industry grouping and election cycle.