Consulting occupation money in the 2010 FEC cycle

Consulting as occupation, 2010 as the cycle

Two FEC fields define the cell: occupation CONSULTING and election cycle 2010. Matching rows sum to $268,181, 283 contributions, and 158 donors. CONSULTING in 2010 reuses the same function noun as the 2014 join, with a different dollar cell, fewer lines, and a midterm clock of its own. The occupation hub is $6,916,859 across every cycle in the aggregate. The 2010 cycle hub mixes every other occupation that used that year. Neither hub restates this intersection; this tie page exists because the two dimensions meet.

2010’s dollar share is 3.9% ($268,181 of $6,916,859). The remainder, $6,648,678, sits in other cycles on the occupation hub (96.1%). Hundreds of donor keys and under three hundred lines is a slightly thinner function-noun cell than the 2014 midterm cut. Correlation between a job title and a two-year FEC window is a reporting overlap, not causation of an election outcome. Itemized individual receipts are the coverage. Unitemized money never appears in $268,181.

The same function noun, a different two-year clock

$6,916,859 is the occupation-side denominator. It is not limited to 2010. Sibling strings (CONSULTANT, MANAGEMENT CONSULTANT, and CONSULTING FIRM) stay on other pages. Adding those keys to $6,916,859 would be a researcher-built recode, not this table. Occupation labels are filer-entered on itemized individual receipts. The occupation is not a NAICS consulting-sector total, a firm-headcount census, or a consultancy PAC.

Open Consulting donations for the $6,916,859 roll. Open the 2010 election cycle hub for every occupation in that window. All occupations and All FEC ties place this pair beside other occupation-cycle pages without combining dollar figures. Do not add the 2014 Consulting cell to this 2010 figure. Each cycle is a separate join against the same occupation total.

158 donors inside the 2010 midterm window

The 2010 election cycle hub holds itemized individual receipts for every occupation coded to that even-year window. This tie keeps only Consulting. $268,181 is therefore not a cycle-wide total. FEC.gov labels this even-year federal window 2010. A midterm FEC window. It is not a 2008 presidential window and not a 2012 presidential cycle.

283 itemized lines from 158 unique donors is about 1.8 receipts per donor. Mean per line about $948; mean per donor about $1,697. About 1.8 itemized rows per donor is a filing ratio. The packet has no median, no party split, and no employer table. Unitemized federal gifts never enter $268,181. Hundreds of donor keys and under three hundred lines is a slightly thinner function-noun cell than the 2014 midterm cut.

What Consulting dollars in 2010 are not

Matching Consulting with 2010 does not measure influence, does not assign party, and does not say Consulting donors caused an electoral result. Correlation between an occupation string and a cycle is not causation. The table is also not a NAICS consulting-sector total, a firm-headcount census, or a consultancy PAC.

Itemized individual contributions from FEC.gov only. Independent expenditures, unitemized gifts, and state-office campaigns are excluded. Occupation labels are filer-entered. Consultant as a person-title remains a different occupation page. This join keeps the noun CONSULTING. Campaign gifts and federal awards remain separate public records. This page does not claim that $268,181 funded USAspending obligations.

How to cite Consulting × 2010

A complete claim names Consulting and 2010, then $268,181, 283 contributions, 158 donors, and 3.9% of $6,916,859, source FEC.gov. Do not convert 158 keys into licensed or employed practitioners. Do not fold independent expenditures or USAspending awards into the cell. Keep both sides of the name—Consulting and 2010—whenever the dollars are quoted. Mean gift $948 and mean per donor $1,697 travel with those counts; they do not travel with a licensing board.

Occupation hub, 2010 hub, and the 2014 sibling cell

Consulting donations holds the $6,916,859 occupation total. The 2010 election cycle page holds every occupation in that window, not only Consulting. All occupations places CONSULTING beside other titles without merging sibling strings (CONSULTANT, MANAGEMENT CONSULTANT, and CONSULTING FIRM). All FEC ties lists other occupation-cycle pairs so $268,181 is not added to a different year. Those four internal links are the only hrefs this copy may use.

The occupation hub still holds $6,648,678 (96.1%) outside 2010. Most of the $6,916,859 roll is not this cycle’s cell. Do not add the 2014 Consulting cell to this 2010 figure. Each cycle is a separate join against the same occupation total. Gifts per donor in 2010 average about 1.8. That ratio is 283 divided by 158, not a measure of turnout. Quote both keys: Consulting and 2010. Quote the dollars: $268,181. Quote the volume: 283 contributions, 158 donors. Quote the source: FEC.gov.

Questions

How much did Consulting-labeled donors give in 2010?

The Consulting grouping’s 2010 cell is $268,181 in itemized individual contributions, from 283 contributions and 158 donors, per FEC.gov aggregates. That is the occupation-cycle join, not a PAC total and not the $6,916,859 all-cycle occupation total. Occupation labels are filer-entered.

Is the 2010 Consulting cell the same as 2014?

No. Both use occupation CONSULTING, but 2010 is a different even-year filter with its own dollar, contribution, and donor counts. The 2010 cycle filter on Consulting is $268,181, 283 contributions, and 158 donors. The occupation total across cycles is $6,916,859.

What share of Consulting FEC money fell in 2010?

About 3.9%. $268,181 divided by $6,916,859 is the 2010 cell’s share of the lifetime occupation bucket. Other cycles hold about 96.1% ($6,648,678) on the occupation hub. See the Consulting occupation hub for other cycles and the 2010 cycle hub for other strings.

Does Consulting 2010 money fund federal awards?

No. These figures are FEC individual contribution aggregates. Federal awards are published by USAspending. This page does not claim that campaign gifts funded those awards. $268,181 is itemized receipts tagged CONSULTING in 2010, not an obligation total. Cite the 2010 intersection as $268,181 and 283 contributions from 158 donors, not the $6,916,859 occupation total.