Corporation political money — 2010 cycle

Corporation as stored text, 2010 as cycle

Employer and occupation groupings sit on one axis; election cycles sit on the other. Rows that match both — Corporation and 2010 — sum to $1,105,623. 6 itemized contributions and 1 unique donor produced it. The total is not an official organization disbursement and does not name recipients. Independent expenditures and committee transfers live in other FEC tables.

Neither the Corporation hub nor the 2010 election cycle hub is this number; each hub drops one of the two keys. Corporation is filer-entered employer text, not a corporate PAC, not a C-corporation census, and not a Treasury EIN file. 1 donor and 6 lines in 2010 matched that word. Named legal entities, SELF, SELF-EMPLOYED, and NOT A CORPORATION sit in other keys. This page is the one-word Corporation string. This page is the stored string CORPORATION.

LobbyVault keeps this two-key page so a reader can open Corporation 2010 without treating the industry hub as a cycle total or the 2010 cycle hub as an employer total. The overlay at the Corporation 2010 path holds the itemized rows for this cell. This prose publishes the packet snapshot: $1,105,623, 6 contributions, 1 donors, and 1.7% of $66,264,486.

1.7% of the Corporation roll

The grouping’s stored total across cycles is $66,264,486. The 2010 slice of $1,105,623 is about 1.7% of that running sum. Other even-year windows hold the remaining 98.3% ($65,158,863). Treating 2010 as the Corporation FEC story would ignore that remainder.

Treat $66,264,486 as the denominator for the 1.7% share. It is not market capitalization, not revenue, and not proof of a multi-year political program. The industry hub is the year index for this string. This tie keeps 2010 from being folded silently into $66,264,486.

A 1.7% cell can sit next to larger or smaller even-year windows on the same Corporation hub. This packet does not publish those other cycle dollars, so they are not cited here. Open Corporation to drop the year filter. Open the 2010 election cycle to drop the employer filter.

6 contributions from 1 donor

Dividing $1,105,623 by 6 contributions yields about $184,270 per itemized gift. Dividing by 1 donor yields about $1,105,623 per donor. Contributions per donor average about 6.0. Those means describe the arithmetic on the packet. They are not medians and not a party split.

1 unique donor is a small headcount. Repeat gifts raise the contribution count (6 lines) faster than the donor count. A one- or few-donor cell is still itemized individual contributions grouped by employer text — not a corporate contribution, not a PAC, and not a unique-employee census. Retirees and household members who reuse a workplace or title can appear. The overlay for Corporation 2010 holds the rows.

6 is a receipt count, not a unique-person census beyond the 1 donor figure already in the packet. A person who gave twice is two lines inside the 6. Unitemized gifts never appear in $1,105,623.

2010 as the cycle dimension

The 2010 election cycle hub includes every stored employer for that window. Corporation is one cell in that matrix. This packet does not publish a cycle-wide denominator, so no national share is stated. Open the 2010 election cycle to drop the employer filter and Corporation to drop the year.

Gifts from both years of the two-year FEC window sit in the $1,105,623 cell because the cycle is a two-year tag, not a single Tuesday. That mechanical fact is easy to forget when a searcher wants an election-night number. The overlay is where dates become visible. This join publishes the cycle total, the 6 contributions, the 1 unique donor, and the 1.7% share of $66,264,486.

2010 is a midterm federal cycle on FEC.gov. That calendar label does not explain $1,105,623. This packet does not carry party splits, committee names, or occupation mix beyond the stored string CORPORATION. Cite the two packet dollars — $1,105,623 for the 2010 slice and $66,264,486 for the Corporation book — and stop before assigning motive.

What the Commission does not verify

Itemized individual receipts are the universe. Unitemized gifts, independent expenditures, and PAC disbursements sit outside $1,105,623. Federal awards in other databases are different datasets. Sharing an employer string and a calendar year does not turn these gifts into contracts or grants. The page is not a corporate PAC and not a business-entity census.

Correlation between an employer or occupation string and a cycle year is not causation. The records show a text match, a date window, 1 donor, and 6 contributions. Named legal entities, SELF, SELF-EMPLOYED, and NOT A CORPORATION sit in other keys. This page is the one-word Corporation string. All FEC ties lists other two-dimension pages.

Do not read $1,105,623 as proof that Corporation “drove” the 2010 cycle or that 2010 “drove” the Corporation book. The join is two fields. If the live hubs disagree with $1,105,623 or 1 donors, the newer FEC extract controls. This snapshot is not a third disclosure system.

Citing Corporation and 2010 together

Start with $1,105,623, then Corporation 2010 for rows, then the industry hub or the 2010 election cycle if a filter needs to come off. Citation template: Corporation, 2010, $1,105,623, 6 contributions, 1 donor, 1.7% of $66,264,486, source FEC.gov. Keep neighboring spellings and occupation titles out of the total unless they grouped to this exact string CORPORATION.

The 1.7% share, the 1-donor count, and the $184,270 mean gift belong to this intersection. Carry them onto a successor label or a sibling occupation word and they stop being facts from this packet. This prose is a packet snapshot. If a later extract disagrees, FEC.gov and the live overlay control.

Questions

How much did Corporation donors give in 2010?

FEC.gov aggregates show $1,105,623 in itemized individual contributions for the Corporation grouping in the 2010 cycle, across 6 contributions and 1 donor. That sum is not a PAC total and not the $66,264,486 all-cycle figure.

What share of Corporation FEC money is 2010?

The grouping’s all-cycle total is $66,264,486. The 2010 cell of $1,105,623 is about 1.7% of that figure. Other cycles hold the remaining 98.3% ($65,158,863) on the industry hub. The overlay lists itemized rows for this cell; the Corporation hub holds other cycles; the 2010 election cycle hub holds other employer strings from the same window.

Does this include only licensed or currently employed Corporation donors?

No. The bucket is the self-reported string CORPORATION. The FEC does not verify licenses or current jobs. Related phrases may sit in other groupings. This join reports the string match for 2010 only, totaling $1,105,623 from 1 donor.

Where is the overlay for the Corporation 2010 join?

Open Corporation 2010 for the cycle overlay, Corporation for the grouping hub, and the 2010 election cycle for the year without this employer filter. All FEC ties lists other two-dimension pages. This JSON file names the join; the overlay holds the itemized rows.