Skip to main content
← All data ties

Dana Corp political contributions from Toledo, OH

Dana Corp-labeled donors in Toledo, OH reported $11,500 on 4 FEC.gov receipts from 2 donors. Toledo’s unfiltered city book is $40,980,294 across 64,392 contributions. The Dana Corp slice is under 0.1% of city dollars. DANA CORP is an employer string, not a NAICS transportation-equipment code.

Key figures

  • Dana Corp in Toledo, OH: $11,500 on 4 receipts from 2 donors.
  • Toledo city-wide FEC itemized total: $40,980,294 on 64,392 contributions.
  • The Dana Corp slice is under 0.1% of Toledo dollars — a labeled subset, not the city book.
  • DANA CORP is an exact filer-entered label, not a NAICS sector roll-up.
  • City labels are filer-entered. The join is not a federal-award trail.

Toledo, OH without the employer filter

Start from the city tape: $40,980,294 on 64,392 itemized individual contributions filed with city TOLEDO and state OH. Toledo is a filer-entered Ohio city. Other Ohio cities are other keys even when the same employer string appears there. Ohio campaign finance is the state extract; $40,980,294 is Toledo’s city tape. That book mixes every employer string. It is the parent, not the join.

Narrow to DANA CORP and the surviving cell is $11,500 — 4 receipts, 2 donors, under 0.1% of city dollars ($41 million rounded). FEC.gov individual contribution aggregates are the source.

Putting Dana Corp back on the row

DANA CORP is the exact stored grouping. DANA CORPORATION, DANA INC, and plant-level names are other keys. This is not NAICS 3363. $11,500 is the Toledo intersection only.

Four receipts from two donors: the mean per donor is arithmetic on a two-person cluster, not a typical gift. Packet quotients: about $2,875 per receipt ($11,500 / 4) and about $5,750 per donor ($11,500 / 2). Not medians. Not typical.

Parents: Toledo, OH for all industries in Toledo; Dana Corp for this string in every city; Ohio campaign finance for Ohio; All FEC ties for other joins. This page is both filters.

Line count versus people

4 is receipts. 2 is harvested donors in this extract. They are different nouns. Repeats raise 4 without raising 2. 64,392 is city-field lines, not unique Toledo residents.

Household pairs that stored the same two labels add receipts. Spelling variants that missed DANA CORP add nothing to $11,500 even if a reader thinks they “belong.” Exact match is the rule.

What not to infer

Do not infer a federal award. Do not infer a neighborhood ranking. Do not infer that Dana Corp is the largest employer string in Toledo — under 0.1% of $40,980,294 says the opposite about this exact key, and still is not a sector ranking.

Do not infer causation. Do not mix Ohio state filings into $11,500. Do not mix USAspending. Party and cycle are unpublished in this packet.

Citation template

Employer/industry grouping DANA CORP, contributor city Toledo, OH, $11,500 on 4 itemized individual contributions from 2 donors, against city-wide $40,980,294 on 64,392 contributions (under 0.1%). Source: FEC.gov. City labels are filer-entered. Employer strings are not NAICS.

If a later extract disagrees, FEC.gov and the live Toledo, OH / Dana Corp hubs control. Do not add $11,500 to $40,980,294. Keep both sides of the join in the sentence. Ohio campaign finance and All FEC ties complete the four-link set.

Cycle pages and names stay elsewhere

This file does not invent an election-cycle year. City-cycle pages cut Toledo by even-year window. Industry-cycle pages cut Dana Corp by even-year window. Mixing those cuts into $11,500 would be a third extract this packet never published.

The 2 harvested donors are not named here. Recipient committees are unpublished in this packet. Open Toledo, OH, Dana Corp, or FEC.gov itemizations for those fields if the live table carries them. Packet facts only. Keep the nouns attached: 4 is receipts, 2 is harvested donors, $11,500 is the join, and $40,980,294 is the Toledo city book on 64,392 lines. Swapping those nouns is a citation error. About $2,875 per receipt and about $5,750 per donor remain packet quotients, not medians and not salaries. DANA CORP is still not a NAICS code. Toledo, OH is still a filer-entered city string. FEC.gov remains the originating system for every integer on this page. Researchers who need the unfiltered Toledo tape should open Toledo, OH rather than inflating $11,500 into $40,980,294. Researchers who need DANA CORP in every city should open Dana Corp rather than guessing a nationwide total from this slice. Ohio campaign finance answers Ohio, a larger geography than Toledo. All FEC ties lists sibling joins. None of those four destinations converts $11,500 into a USAspending obligation. Unitemized federal gifts and Ohio state-office filings remain outside both the join and the city book as built here.

Questions

How much did Dana Corp donors in Toledo, OH contribute?
Itemized individual contributions tagged DANA CORP and Toledo, OH total $11,500 across 4 receipts from 2 donors on FEC.gov aggregates indexed here. That join is under 0.1% of Toledo’s $40,980,294 city-wide book. It is not a PAC total. Original reports remain on FEC.gov.
What share of Toledo, OH itemized money is Dana Corp?
$11,500 is under 0.1% of the $41 million Toledo, OH city book (64,392 city-field contributions). A thin share usually means other employer strings dominate the city tape, not that the grouping is absent. Quote both dollars. Do not upgrade under 0.1% into a sector ranking.
Does Dana Corp money in Toledo fund federal spending there?
No. These figures are FEC individual contributions, not USAspending awards. $11,500 does not become a contract because both rows can mention Toledo. Different statutes, different forms. This packet has no obligation dollars. Filings remain on FEC.gov. Keep both Dana Corp and Toledo in the sentence when quoting $11,500.
Is DANA CORP a NAICS industry?
No. DANA CORP is a filer-entered employer or occupation string on FEC itemizations, not a NAICS code. $11,500 counts only rows that stored this exact text with city Toledo. Other spellings and related job titles are other keys. LobbyVault does not recode the field into a sector.

FEC.gov individual contribution aggregates by donor city and employer/industry grouping. City labels are filer-entered.