Developer contributions received by Our Principles PAC

Thirty-five lines carrying $2,700,000 to Our Principles PAC

Developer is the grouped employer or occupation key. OUR PRINCIPLES PAC is committee C00603621. This page is the overlap: itemized individual gifts whose field grouped to DEVELOPER and whose recipient is that committee. The $2,700,000 figure is the intersection.

35 contributions averaging about $77,143 ($2,700,000 ÷ 35) describe a sparse, high-mean cell (35 lines at about $77,143). The packet does not name the 35 filers or say whether they are one household repeating. A line count is a filing pattern, not a unique-donor census.

The join exists so the industry hub ($33,132,163) and the committee hub are not treated as the same list. C00603621 is the FEC committee ID on this URL. Independent expenditures stay outside $2,700,000.

Developer as stored FEC employer text

DEVELOPER is filer-entered text. a short occupation-as-industry string that can mean real estate, software, or another trade. LAND DEVELOPER, REAL ESTATE DEVELOPER, and SOFTWARE DEVELOPER can sit on other keys. This page does not recode a corporate family or a NAICS sector into $33,132,163.

Occupation strings without this employer key sit on occupation hubs. This URL is Developer × Our Principles PAC, an industry-to-committee join, not an industry-to-cycle cell. Open the Developer industry hub for the $33,132,163 employer total and other committees.

OUR PRINCIPLES PAC (C00603621)

C00603621 is disclosed as OUR PRINCIPLES PAC. This page does not list independent expenditures the committee made. The $2,700,000 is Developer-coded individual receipts. Other employers giving to Our Principles PAC appear on the committee hub. Adding them here would break the 35-line filter.

35 lines at about $77,143 each describe the cell arithmetic. That mean is $2,700,000 divided by 35. It is not a typical gift, not a limit, and not a payroll calendar. It does not identify who directed the gifts or whether Developer as an entity participated.

Eight percent of the Developer grouping

About 8.1% of $33,132,163 is $2,700,000 to Our Principles PAC. That percentage describes overlap of two FEC groupings, not a finding that Developer as an entity directed the gifts. This committee is one recipient among several that stored the same employer/industry string.

The leftover $30,432,163 (91.9% of $33,132,163) went to other committees under the same Developer grouping, or sits outside this recipient filter. The Developer industry hub holds that remainder. The OUR PRINCIPLES PAC page holds receipts whose employer field did not group to DEVELOPER.

A developer label is not a housing or HUD award

HUD, software, or construction USAspending awards that use developer in a vendor name are a different dataset. This join does not claim that $2,700,000 in itemized gifts funded federal work, or that federal work funded the gifts. Campaign contributions are not federal awards. Two datasets can share a name without sharing a payment trail.

Cite $2,700,000, 35 contributions, $33,132,163, and C00603621. Keep both sides named: Developer as grouped text, OUR PRINCIPLES PAC as recipient. Motive is outside the packet. Unitemized gifts never appear.

Corporate treasury contributions, if any exist on other schedules, are not in these facts. Open the Developer industry hub for the leftover $30,432,163 (91.9%) on other committees.

How to cite this Developer × Our Principles PAC join

The Developer industry page holds the $33,132,163 grouping and the committees that received the other 91.9%. The Our Principles PAC page holds C00603621 receipts from every employer. All industries and all FEC ties collect neighboring pairs without mixing independent expenditures into this 35-line cell.

Researchers who need names behind the 35 contribution lines must leave this prose page for the committee and industry tables. This tie only publishes the overlap: $2,700,000 coded to DEVELOPER and received by OUR PRINCIPLES PAC (C00603621), against a grouping of $33,132,163. About 8.1% of that grouping is here; $30,432,163 is not. Dollars per line average about $77,143.

Live hubs override this snapshot. If the overlay disagrees with $2,700,000, 35, or C00603621, the overlay and FEC.gov control. Source: FEC.gov aggregates of itemized individual contributions grouped by employer/industry and recipient committee. Not independent expenditures.

Questions

How much did Developer donors give Our Principles PAC?

FEC.gov aggregates of itemized individual contributions show $2,700,000 coded to the Developer grouping and received by OUR PRINCIPLES PAC (C00603621). That join covers 35 contributions. The broader grouping across all committees is $33,132,163. These figures are not independent expenditures.

Does Developer mean real-estate developers only?

The packet stores DEVELOPER as filer-entered text. It does not split real estate from software or other trades. LAND DEVELOPER is a separate key. This page reports only the DEVELOPER × C00603621 join. Cite FEC.gov for $2,700,000 to OUR PRINCIPLES PAC (C00603621) from the Developer grouping, across 35 itemized contributions.

What share of Developer FEC money went to this committee?

About 8.1% of the $33,132,163 Developer total is in this join: $2,700,000 to Our Principles PAC. About $30,432,163 went to other committees. That percentage describes overlap of two FEC groupings, not a finding that the labeled entity directed the gifts.

Why does the packet list 35 contributions?

The packet lists 35 itemized contribution lines totaling $2,700,000, about $77,143 per line. That is a receipt count, not a unique-donor count. Unitemized gifts and independent expenditures are not in this join. Use the C00603621 hub for other receipt types.