How many dollars group to DREXEL BURNHAM LAMBERT in 2012?

LobbyVault attributes $375,008 to that employer/industry string in 2012, from 168 contributions and 46 donors. These are itemized individual receipts. The all-cycle grouping is $4,097,329. Cite FEC.gov for $375,008, 168 contributions, and 46 donors on the Drexel Burnham Lambert × 2012 join.

How much of $4,097,329 is outside 2012?

No. $375,008 is 9.15% of the all-cycle total of $4,097,329. Other cycles hold $3,722,321, or 90.8%. This page publishes only the 2012 intersection. A share is not a preference finding. Cite FEC.gov for $375,008, 168 contributions, and 46 donors on the Drexel Burnham Lambert × 2012 join.

Are these PAC or corporate dollars from Drexel Burnham Lambert?

No. The total is itemized individual contributions whose employer or occupation field grouped to DREXEL BURNHAM LAMBERT. Mean gift size near $2,232 across 168 lines is a ratio, not a treasury gift. Cite FEC.gov for $375,008, 168 contributions, and 46 donors on the Drexel Burnham Lambert × 2012 join.

Does 46 equal Drexel Burnham Lambert headcount in 2012?

They are 46 unique donors on itemized receipts grouped to DREXEL BURNHAM LAMBERT in 2012. Alumni, spouses, and other spellings may sit here or on other keys. LobbyVault does not verify payroll and does not invent names in this file. Cite FEC.gov for $375,008, 168 contributions, and 46 donors on the Drexel Burnham Lambert × 2012 join.

← All data ties

Drexel Burnham Lambert and the 2012 FEC election cycle

9.15% of the $4,097,329 DREXEL BURNHAM LAMBERT parent sits in 2012: $375,008 from 168 lines and 46 donors. The leftover $3,722,321 (90.8%) lives in other cycles. Source: FEC.gov. This URL is the intersection only.

Key figures

DREXEL BURNHAM LAMBERT in 2012 totals $375,008 from 46 donors and 168 contributions.
That slice is 9.15% of the all-cycle total of $4,097,329.
Mean gift size is about $2,232; mean per donor is about $8,152.
The label is FEC employer/industry text, not a corporate contribution.
Source: FEC.gov via LobbyVault.

Drexel Burnham Lambert itemized receipts tagged to 2012

Drexel Burnham Lambert × 2012 totals $375,008 from 46 donors and 168 lines, 9.15% of the $4,097,329 parent. A historical firm name on 2012 receipts is a grouping fact. This page does not claim the 2012 legal entity matched an earlier decade’s firm. DREXEL BURNHAM LAMBERT is grouped employer text that can still appear years after the historical firm name. DREXEL BURNHAM and DBL spellings can be other keys. This page does not recode successor employers.

Recipient committees and disclosed contributor names are not in these headline facts. Use the Drexel Burnham Lambert 2012 overlay for those rows.

The DREXEL BURNHAM LAMBERT total across cycles

The industry book $4,097,329 is not a corporate political budget. It is a sum of Schedule A lines that grouped to this string across cycles. 2012 is one clock on that tape.

A share of 9.15% does not rank Drexel Burnham Lambert against other employers in 2012. Ranking is not in the packet.

2012 as the cycle key

FEC cycle 2012 is the two-year federal clock labeled 2012. Inside that clock, Drexel Burnham Lambert is one employer/occupation grouping among many. The 2012 election cycle hub shows other strings in the same window. This page keeps Drexel Burnham Lambert and 2012 named together so neither hub is mistaken for the join. 168 contributions and 46 donors are counts on itemized receipts grouped to DREXEL BURNHAM LAMBERT in that window, not a workforce census.

DREXEL BURNHAM LAMBERT is grouped employer text that can still appear years after the historical firm name. DREXEL BURNHAM and DBL spellings can be other keys. This page does not recode successor employers. The Drexel Burnham Lambert 2012 overlay is the overlay. The Drexel Burnham Lambert industry page is the parent grouping. The 2012 election cycle page is the cycle census. All FEC ties lists other joins.

What this join is not

USAspending rows for the same calendar years are a different dataset. This join does not claim that $375,008 funded federal awards, or that federal awards funded the gifts. Campaign contributions are not federal awards. Geography or employer text on a contribution line does not convert the gift into an obligation.

Unitemized gifts and corporate treasury schedules are outside $375,008. LobbyVault does not treat 46 unique donors as a headcount of everyone associated with DREXEL BURNHAM LAMBERT in 2012. Mean gift size near $2,232 and mean per donor near $8,152 are ratios on this presidential-year cell. They are not a 10-K political-activity line. Occupations, employers, and tribal or government strings are stored as the filer typed them. LobbyVault groups exact keys; it does not audit HR files.

How to cite Drexel Burnham Lambert in 2012

Internal links go to Drexel Burnham Lambert 2012, the Drexel Burnham Lambert industry hub, the 2012 election cycle, and All FEC ties. Use those four doors. The overlay lists disclosed names and recipient committees. The industry hub holds $4,097,329. The cycle hub holds other employer strings in 2012.

A complete citation: receipts grouped to DREXEL BURNHAM LAMBERT in FEC cycle 2012 total $375,008 from 46 donors and 168 itemized contributions, 9.15% of the all-cycle total of $4,097,329. The leftover outside 2012 is $3,722,321, or 90.8%. Cite FEC.gov. Live hubs override this snapshot. If the overlay disagrees, the overlay and FEC.gov control.

Keep both join sides in every citation of the headline total. This /ties/ page is a snapshot of packet facts, not a substitute for live FEC.gov bulk files. Amended reports can move either side of the join; the newer extract controls. Internal links stay on the packet hrefs only. Unitemized activity and independent expenditures remain outside these totals.

The four hrefs on this packet are /industries/drexel-burnham-lambert/cycles/2012/, /industries/drexel-burnham-lambert/, /election-cycles/2012/, and /ties/. No other internal paths are authorized here.

Drexel Burnham Lambert × 2012 is a join page. Quote $375,008 only with both sides named. The presidential-year window labeled 2012 is not interchangeable with adjacent even-year clocks. 168 itemized lines and 46 unique donors are extract counts. Sibling keys mentioned as possibilities are not totals on this page. FEC.gov bulk files remain the underlying source; LobbyVault publishes grouped aggregates. Drexel Burnham Lambert × 2012 totals $375,008 from 46 donors and 168 lines, 9.15% of the $4,097,329 parent. A historical firm name on 2012 receipts is a grouping fact. This page does not claim the 2012 legal entity matched an earlier decade’s firm.

Questions

How many dollars group to DREXEL BURNHAM LAMBERT in 2012?: LobbyVault attributes $375,008 to that employer/industry string in 2012, from 168 contributions and 46 donors. These are itemized individual receipts. The all-cycle grouping is $4,097,329. Cite FEC.gov for $375,008, 168 contributions, and 46 donors on the Drexel Burnham Lambert × 2012 join.
How much of $4,097,329 is outside 2012?: No. $375,008 is 9.15% of the all-cycle total of $4,097,329. Other cycles hold $3,722,321, or 90.8%. This page publishes only the 2012 intersection. A share is not a preference finding. Cite FEC.gov for $375,008, 168 contributions, and 46 donors on the Drexel Burnham Lambert × 2012 join.
Are these PAC or corporate dollars from Drexel Burnham Lambert?: No. The total is itemized individual contributions whose employer or occupation field grouped to DREXEL BURNHAM LAMBERT. Mean gift size near $2,232 across 168 lines is a ratio, not a treasury gift. Cite FEC.gov for $375,008, 168 contributions, and 46 donors on the Drexel Burnham Lambert × 2012 join.
Does 46 equal Drexel Burnham Lambert headcount in 2012?: They are 46 unique donors on itemized receipts grouped to DREXEL BURNHAM LAMBERT in 2012. Alumni, spouses, and other spellings may sit here or on other keys. LobbyVault does not verify payroll and does not invent names in this file. Cite FEC.gov for $375,008, 168 contributions, and 46 donors on the Drexel Burnham Lambert × 2012 join.

FEC.gov individual contribution aggregates by employer/industry grouping and election cycle.