EMILY'S LIST committee receipts in the 2014 cycle

2014 filtered to EMILY'S LIST

Apply EMILY'S LIST to the 2014 election cycle and the remaining money is $44,206,357.42 in receipts. Disbursements remaining in the cell are $44,878,361.90. The committee overlay lists the rows; this file explains the relationship.

EMILY'S LIST is qualified PAC on C00193433 in a 2014 midterm window. isSuperPac 0. It is not a donor biography. Repeat filings can raise cycle totals without this JSON naming a person.

EMILY'S LIST in 2014 is an earlier midterm cell for C00193433. Later even-year totals for the same ID are other ties. In this cell, disbursements exceed receipts. Spending more than was received in the window is not insolvency. It is two packet numbers. Cash on hand is unpublished. Type Q stays qualified PAC. The all-cycle committee hub still includes other windows. Citing that hub as if it were 2014 would overstate or understate this cell.

The committee overlay versus this 2014 cell

The committee hub answers every-cycle questions for C00193433. This tie answers the both-filters question: $44,206,357.42 receipts, $44,878,361.90 disbursements in 2014. Disbursements $44,878,361.90 exceed receipts $44,206,357.42 by $672,004.48. Spending above receipts in a window is not insolvency and not a debt schedule.

Spending more than was received in the window is not insolvency. It is two packet numbers. Cash on hand is unpublished. Type Q stays qualified PAC. Quote the live committee page if the overlay has refreshed. Quote this packet only as a snapshot of the harvested join.

What the 2014 hub still holds

The 2014 election cycle page holds every committee in that window. EMILY'S LIST is one row in that overlay, not the overlay. $44,206,357.42 is not a cycle grand total.

Spending more than was received in the window is not insolvency. It is two packet numbers. Cash on hand is unpublished. Type Q stays qualified PAC. All committees and All FEC ties collect sibling committee-cycle pairs from the same two fields.

Receipts and disbursements stay separate labels

Do not add receipts $44,206,357.42 to disbursements $44,878,361.90. They are not two funding streams. They are inflows and outflows on the same committee-cycle pair.

Do not add this cell to USAspending.gov obligations. Campaign-finance receipts do not fund federal awards in this join. Different datasets.

Not a donor page and not USAspending

This is a committee × cycle page, not a donor roster. EMILY'S LIST received $44,206,357.42 in the 2014 window as a committee total. That sentence still names no contributor.

USAspending.gov obligations are not this table. Do not write that donations funded federal awards. Different datasets, even when geography or a brand word overlaps a news story.

One-line citation

One line: EMILY'S LIST (C00193433) ∩ 2014 = $44,206,357.42 receipts and $44,878,361.90 disbursements on FEC.gov. Type Q; isSuperPac 0. Not a donor page.

EMILY'S LIST in 2014 is an earlier midterm cell for C00193433. Later even-year totals for the same ID are other ties. In this cell, disbursements exceed receipts. All FEC ties collects other committee-cycle pairs. All committees is the ID index.

Read the four internal links as parents, not as extra dollars. EMILY'S LIST is the committee overlay for C00193433. The 2014 election cycle is the year overlay without a EMILY'S LIST filter. All committees is the ID index. All FEC ties is the two-key index. None of those pages should be added into $44,206,357.42 or $44,878,361.90. The harvested cell is already the overlap.

A researcher quoting this join in one sentence can use: EMILY'S LIST, committee C00193433, FEC type Q (qualified PAC (FEC type Q)), isSuperPac 0, cycle 2014 (a midterm FEC two-year window), receipts $44,206,357.42, disbursements $44,878,361.90. That sentence uses only packet facts. It still names no donors, no ad targets, no cash on hand, and no USAspending awards. If any of those fields is required, this JSON file is the wrong object.

Committee-cycle pages exist because topCommittees inside cycle-details is a join table. EMILY'S LIST can appear in more than one even-year window; 2014 can contain thousands of other committees. This file isolates one pair. Spending more than was received in the window is not insolvency. It is two packet numbers. Cash on hand is unpublished. Type Q stays qualified PAC. Amended filings after harvest can move $44,206,357.42 or $44,878,361.90; prefer the live overlay when the table and this snapshot disagree.

Questions

How much did EMILY'S LIST report in 2014?

EMILY'S LIST (C00193433) reported $44,206,357.42 in FEC receipts in the 2014 cycle and $44,878,361.90 in disbursements. Committee type is stored as Q; isSuperPac 0. Figures are FEC.gov committee receipts by election cycle. This page is not a donor list.

Is this a Super PAC total for EMILY'S LIST?

The packet stores isSuperPac 0 for EMILY'S LIST in 2014. $44,206,357.42 is the cycle-receipts total for committee C00193433, not a recode into a different committee class. Type Q is qualified PAC (FEC type Q). Cite receipts $44,206,357.42 and disbursements $44,878,361.90 together.

Does this page list EMILY'S LIST donors?

No. This is a committee × cycle page. The packet publishes receipts $44,206,357.42, disbursements $44,878,361.90, committee C00193433, and cycle 2014. It does not publish contributor names or a unique-donor count. Inventing donors would leave the packet facts. See the committee overlay for committee-level rows.

What two tables meet on this page?

EMILY'S LIST (C00193433) and the 2014 election cycle. The overlap is $44,206,357.42 receipts and $44,878,361.90 disbursements. All committees and All FEC ties list sibling joins. Original filings remain at FEC.gov. This tie page is the committee-cycle intersection only.