Skip to main content
← All data ties

Energy Transfer Co contributions received by OPPORTUNITY AND FREEDOM I

$8,990,000 in itemized individual contributions is the join between the ENERGY TRANSFER CO employer grouping and OPPORTUNITY AND FREEDOM I (C00580092). Those dollars sit in 75 contributions from FEC.gov individual receipts. The employer grouping totals $12,952,657; this committee cell is about 69% of that pipeline-and-midstream string, not Energy Transfer’s connected PAC and not the committee’s receipts from every other employer.

Key figures

  • OPPORTUNITY AND FREEDOM I received $8,990,000 from ENERGY TRANSFER CO-coded individual gifts across 75 contributions.
  • The ENERGY TRANSFER CO grouping totals $12,952,657, so this committee is about 69% of that labeled money.
  • About $119,867 per contribution is the mean of 75 itemized lines, not a typical paycheck deduction.
  • The join is not a connected-PAC total and not a USAspending award total.

Energy Transfer Co and Opportunity and Freedom I as a pair

ENERGY TRANSFER CO is the grouped employer/industry key. OPPORTUNITY AND FREEDOM I is committee C00580092. This page is the cell where those axes meet: itemized individual gifts whose employer field grouped to ENERGY TRANSFER CO and whose recipient is that committee. The $8,990,000 figure is the intersection.

The employer string is a shortened company name as stored, not a NAICS oil-and-gas rollup and not every legal variant such as ENERGY TRANSFER PARTNERS or ENERGY TRANSFER LP. Those longer names, if present, are other rows. The committee is a separate FEC ID. Matching them does not prove the partnership wrote the checks or reimbursed employees.

Seventy-five contributions totaling $8,990,000 is a low line count against a large dollar cell. The pattern points to sizable itemized gifts rather than a mass deduction file.

Nearly seven-tenths of the Energy Transfer Co grouping

All recipients combined, ENERGY TRANSFER CO shows $12,952,657 in itemized individual money. The Opportunity and Freedom I cell is $8,990,000, or about 69% of that total. About 31% of the grouping went to other committees. Those leftover dollars are on the industry hub.

A 69% share is concentrated overlap. Concentration is not a finding that the company ran a single outside-spending program. Filers who listed a pipeline subsidiary or a different legal name are not automatically in this 69%.

Seventy-five lines into C00580092

OPPORTUNITY AND FREEDOM I received $8,990,000 from ENERGY TRANSFER CO-coded receipts across 75 contributions. Dividing dollars by gifts gives about $119,867 per contribution. That mean is pulled by large itemized amounts. The packet does not name the 75 lines or split them by cycle.

C00580092 also received ACS-coded money and other employer strings on separate tie pages. Those joins are other cells. This page stays on ENERGY TRANSFER CO. Independent expenditures by the committee, if filed, are outside this source note.

Energy employers and federal awards stay on different ledgers

Energy Transfer-related entities can appear in contracting and permitting records. Those records are not FEC individual contributions. This join does not claim that gifts to Opportunity and Freedom I funded USAspending awards, or that pipeline projects funded the gifts. Shared company names across datasets are labels, not a cash pipeline.

Correlation between a midstream employer string and a super PAC-style committee is a reporting pattern. Causation of policy or procurement outcomes is not in the table.

Indexes for neighboring energy and committee joins

The Energy Transfer Co industry page keeps the $12,952,657 grouping. The OPPORTUNITY AND FREEDOM I page keeps C00580092. All industries ranks other energy employer keys. All FEC ties lists other employer-committee cells, including other strings that also meet C00580092, without mixing independent expenditures into this $8,990,000.

C00580092 also appears in the ACS join in this same ties index. Those are different employer filters sharing a committee ID. $8,990,000 from ENERGY TRANSFER CO and $9,890,000 from ACS are not two descriptions of one gift pile. Adding them would double-count nothing in the committee's full total, but it would be wrong to treat either cell as Opportunity and Freedom I's entire file.

Two employers, one committee ID, two cells

When a committee ID shows up on more than one tie page, each page is still one employer string. ENERGY TRANSFER CO's 75 contributions are not ACS's 178 contributions. The means differ because the line counts and dollars differ: about $119,867 here versus about $55,562 on the ACS cell. Those means are arithmetic on different numerators and denominators.

The 69% share ($8,990,000 of $12,952,657) is this employer's concentration toward C00580092. It says nothing about ACS and nothing about pipeline projects in USAspending. ENERGY TRANSFER PARTNERS and ENERGY TRANSFER LP, if stored, remain other keys. Unitemized gifts and independent expenditures remain outside the $8,990,000. Use all FEC ties to keep the two C00580092 cells from collapsing. Keep ENERGY TRANSFER CO as the stored abbreviation in every citation so ENERGY TRANSFER PARTNERS, if indexed, remains a separate row. The 75-line count belongs next to $8,990,000; dropping it makes the cell look like a single treasury check. Unitemized gifts stay omitted.

Questions

How much did Energy Transfer Co-coded donors give Opportunity and Freedom I?
FEC.gov aggregates show $8,990,000 in itemized individual contributions grouped to ENERGY TRANSFER CO and received by OPPORTUNITY AND FREEDOM I (C00580092). That join covers 75 contributions. The employer grouping across all committees is $12,952,657. These figures are not independent expenditures.
What share of Energy Transfer Co FEC money went to this committee?
About 69% of the $12,952,657 ENERGY TRANSFER CO total is in this join: $8,990,000 to C00580092. The remaining share went to other committees. A high percentage describes overlap, not a verified corporate program.
Is this Energy Transfer’s connected PAC?
No. OPPORTUNITY AND FREEDOM I is committee C00580092 in this join. A company connected PAC, if it exists, would be a different committee ID. This page reports only ENERGY TRANSFER CO-coded individual gifts into C00580092.
Do these donations fund federal energy contracts?
No. FEC individual contributions and USAspending obligations are different datasets. This tie does not merge them. Sharing an employer name across ledgers is not evidence that campaign gifts paid for awards.

FEC.gov aggregates of itemized individual contributions grouped by employer/industry and recipient committee. Not independent expenditures.