Engineering Manager political contributions from Utah

Engineering Manager and Utah as a high-row manager join

Occupation ENGINEERING MANAGER and donor state UT produce $77,197, 1,034 contributions, and 5 donors. The occupation hub is $6,757,668, 24,335 contributions, and 757 donors. The three shares are 1.1% of dollars, 4.2% of contributions, and 0.7% of donors. Keep all three; quoting only $77,197 drops the row and donor keys. Utah Engineering Manager contribution share runs far ahead of donor share on a high-row manager title.

Engineering Manager is a two-word manager title as typed, not an Engineer recode and not a Manager recode. Nearby strings — ENGINEER, MANAGER, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING MANAGER, and DIRECTOR OF ENGINEERING — sit in other occupation hubs when filers used those words. Do not stack those dollar figures onto $77,197 or $6,757,668. Five Utah donors produced more than a thousand itemized rows; that density is arithmetic on the packet counts, not a named-employer org chart.

Five Utah donors produced 1,034 contributions, about 206.8 itemized rows per donor in this join, versus about 32.1 rows per donor nationally (24,335 contributions from 757 donors). Mean dollars per donor in this Utah cell are about $15,439, versus about $8,927 across the occupation. Those ratios are arithmetic on the six packet numbers, not a gift-size ranking of influence.

ENGINEERING MANAGER versus Engineer and Manager

ENGINEERING MANAGER is filer-entered. The FEC file does not verify a PE license, a managerial appointment, or a named Utah employer. The national grouping is 757 donors, 24,335 contributions, and $6,757,668.

24,335 contributions from 757 donors shows repeat itemization nationwide. Utah’s 1,034 contributions from 5 donors is the UT-coded piece. This page does not split those rows by cycle, employer, or recipient committee. It locates how much of the labeled money is also coded to Utah.

Five Utah donors and a dense contribution count

Five Utah donors produced 1,034 contributions totaling $77,197. Donor state UT is the address on the record, not proof of a Utah professional license, and not a limit to Utah candidates. Recipients can be any FEC-filing committee.

The Utah campaign-finance hub includes every occupation coded to UT. This join is only ENGINEERING MANAGER. Subtract $77,197 from $6,757,668 and $6,680,471 remains coded Engineering Manager in every other state combined (23,301 contributions, 752 donors). That remainder has no row-by-row breakdown here because those states are other ties.

Contribution share far above donor share on a manager title

This page does not measure engineering manager output, does not rank firms, and does not claim that Engineering Manager-coded money caused any electoral result. Occupation plus state is a bookkeeping join. Correlation is not causation. Not a Utah PE-license extract, not a named-employer org chart, and not an engineering-headcount census.

Unitemized gifts and independent expenditures are omitted. FEC.gov is the source. Occupation labels are filer-entered. Itemized individual contributions only. Firm names, license numbers, and employer strings are not in these six numbers. Donor state UT is not recipient geography.

Engineering titles that stay unmerged

A unique-donor count is not a person-level audit. The FEC aggregate can merge similar names or split one person who filed under variants. A contribution count can be many small itemized rows. A dollar total can hide that skew. Keeping $77,197, 1,034 contributions, and 5 donors on the same page is the point of the join: quoting only the Utah dollars, or only the Engineering Manager national total, drops a key.

Engineering Manager donations holds the $6,757,668 national occupation total. Utah campaign finance holds the state’s itemized individual activity across occupations. All occupations and all FEC ties collect other occupation-state pairs from the same two fields. ENGINEER, MANAGER, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING MANAGER, is a different occupation string if a filer used it.

This relationship is not a forecast and not a ranking of influence. Occupation does not cause contributions, and donor state does not cause recipient geography. Public records, two fields, one intersection. FEC.gov individual contribution aggregates; occupation labels are filer-entered. Five Utah donors produced more than a thousand itemized rows; that density is arithmetic on the packet counts, not a named-employer org chart.

Related FEC tables for Engineering Manager and Utah

Engineering Manager donations holds the $6,757,668 national occupation total. Utah campaign finance holds the state’s itemized individual activity across occupations. All occupations and all FEC ties collect other occupation-state pairs from the same two fields.

Questions

How much have Engineering Manager donors in Utah given?

FEC itemized individual contributions from donors listing occupation Engineering Manager and state Utah total $77,197, from 1,034 contributions and 5 donors. Nationwide, Engineering Manager-coded receipts are $6,757,668 from 24,335 contributions and 757 donors. Utah is 1.1% of those dollars.

Are these licensed Utah engineering managers?

Occupation is ENGINEERING MANAGER and state is UT. The FEC file does not confirm a PE license or a named employer. Engineer and Manager are other occupation keys. This Utah join does not recode those shorter strings into ENGINEERING MANAGER. Five donors produced more than a thousand itemized rows here.

What share of Engineering Manager FEC money is from Utah?

1.1% of the $6,757,668 occupation total is in this Utah join ($77,197). Utah also accounts for 4.2% of contributions (1,034 of 24,335) and 0.7% of donors (5 of 757). Those three shares are computed from the packet facts only.

Does this money go to Utah candidates?

Not necessarily. Donor state is Utah. Recipients can be any FEC-filing committee. This page does not allocate the $77,197 by office or by in-state versus out-of-state campaigns. Independent expenditures are omitted. FEC.gov itemized individual contributions; occupation labels are filer-entered.