Film Producer occupation money in the 2012 FEC cycle

Film Producer as occupation, 2012 as the cycle

Two FEC fields define the cell: occupation FILM PRODUCER and election cycle 2012. Matching rows sum to $471,385, 268 contributions, and 109 donors. Drop either key and the number changes. Producer, movie producer, television producer, and executive producer are other keys if those words appear. This join does not recode the label into a PGA membership roll, a studio credits file, or a studio PAC. Other cycle amounts are not fields in this packet except as the remainder on the occupation hub.

Parent hubs: Film Producer donations at /occupations/film-producer/ and the 2012 election cycle at /election-cycles/2012/. All occupations at /occupations/ lists neighboring titles. All FEC ties at /ties/ keeps each occupation-year cell on its own path so a reader can move without mixing $471,385 into another year or another string. Do not add those parent pages into this cell.

Party, committee, and employer breakdowns for Film Producer in 2012 are not fields in this packet. Do not infer a partisan split from $471,385. Studio versus independent versus television producing is unpublished for Film Producer in 2012. The occupation page and the 2012 cycle page are the next clicks for named committees. Just over one hundred donor keys and under three hundred receipts is a smaller concentrated entertainment-title cell than the 2008 Film Producer join.

The same FILM PRODUCER roll, a 2012 clock

$5.0 million ($5,007,741) belongs to the exact string FILM PRODUCER across harvested cycles. It is not a PGA membership roll, a studio credits file, or a studio PAC. People who wrote nearby wording — producer, movie producer, television producer, and executive producer — sit in other rows if the characters differ. The 2012 slice is 9.4% of that title bucket ($471,385 of $5,007,741). Share of FILM PRODUCER is not share of all 2012 receipts. The remainder, $4,536,356, sits in other cycles on the occupation hub.

Amended individual contribution reports can move $471,385. A later harvest of the same occupation string can move $5,007,741. Rewrite only the sentence whose source moved. Live Film Producer donations and the live 2012 election cycle pages are the tables; this prose is a packet snapshot. Itemized individual contributions are the only receipt class in this cell. Unitemized gifts below the itemization threshold, in-kind goods, and bundled contributions without this occupation string are outside $471,385.

109 film-producer donors and 268 receipts in 2012

109 donors and 268 receipts — about 2.5 lines per donor. Mean per receipt about $1,759; mean per donor about $4,325. Those ratios are arithmetic on two harvested integers. They are not medians, not typical gifts, and not a claim about income. Just over one hundred donor keys and under three hundred receipts is a smaller concentrated entertainment-title cell than the 2008 Film Producer join. No median is published in this packet.

Repeat gifts add receipts. 268 is a line count, not 109 one-time gifts. Studio versus independent versus television producing is not encoded in the occupation string. Neither figure is a headcount of everyone who works in the field named by FILM PRODUCER. People who left occupation blank, used a nearby spelling, or listed a more specific title are not in $471,385. Do not add the 2008 Film Producer cell to this 2012 figure. Each cycle is its own join against the same occupation total.

2012 cell versus the 2008 Film Producer join

Cite $471,385 as Film Producer in 2012. Cite $5,007,741 as this title’s occupation total. Do not add studio and entertainment-industry PAC filings to either figure. Those filings are committee reports. Mixing PAC spending with $471,385 would blend FEC tables. All occupations lists neighboring titles so a searcher can open the other string’s cycle cell rather than rescale 9.4%.

FEC.gov individual contribution aggregates by self-reported occupation and election cycle. This join does not recode FILM PRODUCER into a Bureau of Labor Statistics title, a NAICS code, or a license class. If a researcher needs those crosswalks, they start from the raw string. Correlation is not causation: a presidential-year total does not prove the occupation’s motives, and it does not attach these gifts to any federal spending dataset. USAspending.gov awards are a different ledger. This page does not claim that 2012 donations funded contracts or grants.

How to cite Film Producer money in 2012

A clean footnote names occupation FILM PRODUCER, election cycle 2012, $471,385 in itemized individual contributions, 268 receipts, and 109 donors on FEC.gov. Keep the itemized word. Mean dollars remain about $1,759 per line and $4,325 per donor in the cell. If the live Film Producer donations overlay has refreshed, quote the overlay. Do not treat 268 as unique workers in the trade named by FILM PRODUCER.

This URL exists because two filters meet. Film Producer donations rolls every cycle into one FILM PRODUCER running total. The 2012 election cycle rolls every occupation into one 2012 total. Only the Film Producer × 2012 overlay applies both filters, which is why this page cites 268 receipts and $471,385. All FEC ties is the directory of other occupation-cycle cells.

Occupation hub, 2012 hub, and the 2008 Film Producer cell

The occupation hub still holds $4,536,356 outside 2012. Most of the $5,007,741 roll is not this cycle’s cell. This page isolates the overlap for readers who need both the title and the year, not either hub restated. Do not add the 2008 Film Producer cell to this 2012 figure. Each cycle is its own join against the same occupation total. Gifts per donor in 2012 average about 2.5. That ratio is 268 divided by 109, not a measure of turnout. Original filings remain at FEC.gov. Occupation labels are filer-entered.

Questions

How much did Film Producer filers donate in 2012?

Filers who listed Film Producer itemized $471,385 in FEC individual contributions in 2012, from 268 receipts and 109 donors. That is 9.4% of $5,007,741 under FILM PRODUCER. Producer, movie producer, television producer, and executive producer are other keys when those are the words on the form. Figures are FEC.gov individual contribution aggregates.

Are studio PACs mixed into this 2012 total?

No. $471,385 is individual contributions tagged Film Producer in 2012. Studio and entertainment-industry PAC filings file as committees. Mixing PAC spending with $471,385 would blend FEC tables. See Film Producer donations or the 2012 election cycle hub for committee names. Film Producer in 2012 is $471,385 on 268 receipts from 109 donors.

Are Film Producer labels standardized on FEC forms?

No. FEC.gov stores the occupation as typed. This join uses FILM PRODUCER. Producer, movie producer, television producer, and executive producer are other keys when those characters appear. LobbyVault does not recode the string into a PGA membership roll, a studio credits file, or a studio PAC. Cite $471,385 for this title in 2012 on 268 receipts from 109 donors.

What two tables meet on this page?

Film Producer donations ($5.0 million for the string) and the 2012 election cycle. The overlap is $471,385 from 268 receipts and 109 donors. All FEC ties lists other occupation-cycle cells. All occupations lists neighboring titles. Figures are FEC.gov individual contribution aggregates for Film Producer in 2012.