Financial Services money in the 2010 FEC cycle

Financial Services as occupation, 2010 as the cycle

This cell is Financial Services money inside 2010, not Financial Services money forever and not 2010 money from every occupation. FEC.gov puts $336,481 at that crossing, from 274 itemized contributions and 174 donors. FINANCIAL SERVICES in 2010 is a two-word industry phrase used as occupation. FEC.gov does not assign product line, Series registrations, or employer.

The string FINANCIAL SERVICES is filer-entered. Neighboring labels FINANCE, FINANCIAL ADVISOR, and BANKER are other pages. This file does not invent donor names beyond the 174 count, recipient committees, or dollar amounts beyond the packet.

Readers comparing hubs should remember the missing key. The Financial Services hub lacks the 2010 filter as its only number. The 2010 hub lacks Financial Services as its only occupation. This page has both, totaling $336,481.

A function phrase, not a bank-PAC receipt total

Broker-dealer, insurance, and advisory work can collapse into the phrase. This extract does not restore those longer titles. 274 itemized lines from 174 unique donors is about 1.6 receipts per donor. Mean per line about $1,228; mean per donor about $1,934. Those derived figures use only packet facts. No median, no party split, and no recipient ranking is available here. A mean of $1,228 per itemized line and $1,934 per donor can hide a few large receipts.

174 donors and a four-figure mean gift

The 2010 election cycle hub holds itemized individual receipts for every occupation coded to that even-year window. This tie keeps only Financial Services. $336,481 is therefore not a cycle-wide total. FEC.gov labels this even-year federal window 2010. A midterm FEC window. It is not a 2008 presidential window and not a 2012 presidential cycle.

274 itemized lines from 174 unique donors is about 1.6 receipts per donor. Mean per line about $1,228; mean per donor about $1,934. About 1.6 itemized rows per donor is a filing ratio. The packet has no median, no party split, and no employer table. Unitemized federal gifts never enter $336,481. Under two hundred donor keys and under three hundred lines is a concentrated function-phrase cell, not a mass retail-bank stack.

What Financial Services dollars in 2010 are not

Matching Financial Services with 2010 does not measure influence, does not assign party, and does not say Financial Services donors caused an electoral result. Correlation between an occupation string and a cycle is not causation. The table is also not a NAICS finance-sector total, a FINRA representative file, or a bank PAC.

Itemized individual contributions from FEC.gov only. Independent expenditures, unitemized gifts, and state-office campaigns are excluded. Occupation labels are filer-entered. Broker-dealer, insurance, and advisory work can collapse into the phrase. This extract does not restore those longer titles. Campaign gifts and federal awards remain separate public records. This page does not claim that $336,481 funded USAspending obligations.

How to cite Financial Services × 2010

A complete claim names Financial Services and 2010, then $336,481, 274 contributions, 174 donors, and 4.7% of $7,119,440, source FEC.gov. Do not convert 174 keys into licensed or employed practitioners. Do not fold independent expenditures or USAspending awards into the cell. Keep both sides of the name—Financial Services and 2010—whenever the dollars are quoted. Mean gift $1,228 and mean per donor $1,934 travel with those counts; they do not travel with a licensing board.

Occupation hub, 2010 hub, and Finance as a sibling

Financial Services donations holds the $7,119,440 occupation total. The 2010 election cycle page holds every occupation in that window, not only Financial Services. All occupations places FINANCIAL SERVICES beside other titles without merging sibling strings (FINANCE, FINANCIAL ADVISOR, and BANKER). All FEC ties lists other occupation-cycle pairs so $336,481 is not added to a different year. Those four internal links are the only hrefs this copy may use.

The occupation hub still holds $6,782,959 (95.3%) outside 2010. Most of the $7,119,440 roll is not this cycle’s cell. Finance, banker, and financial advisor remain other keys. This page does not recode those titles into FINANCIAL SERVICES. Gifts per donor in 2010 average about 1.6. That ratio is 274 divided by 174, not a measure of turnout. Quote both keys: Financial Services and 2010. Quote the dollars: $336,481. Quote the volume: 274 contributions, 174 donors. Quote the source: FEC.gov.

Questions

How much did Financial Services-labeled donors give in 2010?

The Financial Services grouping’s 2010 cell is $336,481 in itemized individual contributions, from 274 contributions and 174 donors, per FEC.gov aggregates. That is the occupation-cycle join, not a PAC total and not the $7,119,440 all-cycle occupation total. Occupation labels are filer-entered.

Is Financial Services a NAICS industry total?

No. FINANCIAL SERVICES here is an occupation string on individual contributions, not a NAICS finance-sector roll-up. The 2010 cycle filter on Financial Services is $336,481, 274 contributions, and 174 donors. The occupation total across cycles is $7,119,440.

What share of Financial Services FEC money fell in 2010?

About 4.7%. $336,481 divided by $7,119,440 is the 2010 cell’s share of the lifetime occupation bucket. Other cycles hold about 95.3% ($6,782,959) on the occupation hub. See the Financial Services occupation hub for other cycles and the 2010 cycle hub for other strings.

Does Financial Services 2010 money fund federal awards?

No. These figures are FEC individual contribution aggregates. Federal awards are published by USAspending. This page does not claim that campaign gifts funded those awards. $336,481 is itemized receipts tagged FINANCIAL SERVICES in 2010, not an obligation total. Cite the 2010 intersection as $336,481 and 274 contributions from 174 donors, not the $7,119,440 occupation total.