Skip to main content
← All data ties

Forbes Inc contributions received by FORBES 2000 INC

$7,057,500 in itemized individual contributions is the join between the FORBES INC employer grouping and FORBES 2000 INC (C00343772). That cell covers 249 contributions from FEC.gov individual filings. The employer grouping totals $7,444,749; this candidate-style committee is about 95% of that publishing-company string. Shared FORBES branding on both sides is still two FEC columns, not one account.

Key figures

  • FORBES 2000 INC received $7,057,500 from FORBES INC-coded individual gifts across 249 contributions.
  • The FORBES INC grouping totals $7,444,749, so this committee is about 95% of that labeled money.
  • About $28,343 per contribution is the mean of 249 itemized lines.
  • Shared FORBES branding is still two FEC columns: an employer string and committee C00343772.

Forbes Inc as employer, Forbes 2000 Inc as committee

FORBES INC is the grouped employer key. FORBES 2000 INC is committee C00343772. This page reports itemized individual gifts that carried both labels. The $7,057,500 figure is the intersection. The leftover $387,249 of the grouping ($7,444,749 minus $7,057,500) went to other committees.

FORBES INC is not FORBES MAGAZINE, FORBES MEDIA, or a personal name without INC. Those variants, if stored, are other rows. FORBES 2000 INC is a committee name that includes a year-like 2000; that 2000 is part of the registered title in this packet, not an election-cycle filter and not a year you may cite as a data year beyond the name itself.

Two hundred forty-nine contributions totaling $7,057,500 is a mid-thin line count against a 95% employer overlap.

Ninety-five percent of the Forbes Inc grouping

The FORBES INC grouping shows $7,444,749 in itemized individual money. The Forbes 2000 Inc cell is $7,057,500, or about 95% of that total. Reading the industry hub without the committee filter would still be dominated by C00343772. The join states that dominance instead of leaving it implicit.

A 95% share does not prove the publishing company ran a campaign committee or that every Forbes-coded donor supported the same candidate. It shows how this employer string lined up against one committee ID.

249 lines into C00343772

FORBES 2000 INC received $7,057,500 from FORBES INC-coded receipts across 249 contributions. Dividing dollars by gifts gives about $28,343 per contribution. That mean is arithmetic. Large itemized gifts can sit next to smaller repeats. The packet does not name donors or split the 249 rows by cycle.

The committee overlay includes other employers. Those rows are not in this join. Independent expenditures, if filed, are outside this source note.

Media-company labels and what they do not buy

This join does not prove that Forbes Inc funded Forbes 2000 Inc as a corporate treasury, and it does not connect the $7,057,500 to USAspending awards. A magazine brand on an employer field is not a federal contract. Two FORBES names meeting is a field match.

Correlation between a publisher employer string and a similarly branded committee is a reporting pattern. Causation of election outcomes is not in the 249 lines. The 2000 in the committee name is a title fragment, not a cycle total.

Hubs that keep INC and 2000 INC from collapsing

The Forbes Inc industry page keeps the $7,444,749 grouping. The FORBES 2000 INC page keeps C00343772. All industries ranks other media keys. All FEC ties lists neighboring employer-committee cells so this 95% overlap is not mistaken for the company’s PAC, if any, or for independent expenditures.

The leftover $387,249 ($7,444,749 minus $7,057,500) is FORBES INC-coded money that did not go to C00343772. It is small next to $7,057,500, which is why a 95% share reads like identity. The 249-line count and the $28,343 mean still belong in the citation. The 2000 in the committee name remains a title fragment, not a cycle filter and not a year in the facts.

Two INC names, one join, no cycle implied

FORBES INC is the employer. FORBES 2000 INC is the committee. Shared FORBES and INC tokens do not make them one account. The accurate citation is $7,057,500 of $7,444,749 into C00343772 across 249 itemized contributions. FORBES MEDIA, FORBES MAGAZINE, and a personal name without INC are other keys if stored separately.

Unitemized gifts are omitted. Independent expenditures, if filed, are omitted. The committee overlay includes other employers not in the 249 lines. Do not treat 2000 as an election-cycle total. Do not treat $7,057,500 as magazine-company treasury spending. Quote both full names, the committee ID, the 95% share, and the 249-line count. Keep both INC names in the citation so FORBES MEDIA, if indexed, remains a separate row. The 249-line count belongs next to $7,057,500. The leftover $387,249 of $7,444,749 is the only remainder in this grouping. Do not treat 2000 as a cycle. Unitemized gifts stay omitted.

Questions

How much did Forbes Inc-coded donors give Forbes 2000 Inc?
FEC.gov aggregates show $7,057,500 in itemized individual contributions grouped to FORBES INC and received by FORBES 2000 INC (C00343772). That join covers 249 contributions. The employer grouping across all committees is $7,444,749. These figures are not independent expenditures.
What share of Forbes Inc FEC money went to this committee?
About 95% of the $7,444,749 FORBES INC total is in this join: $7,057,500 to C00343772. The leftover share went to other committees. A near-total share describes overlap, not a corporate treasury gift.
Does the 2000 in the committee name mean the 2000 election cycle?
The packet stores FORBES 2000 INC as the committee name. This page does not treat 2000 as a cycle filter or as a year in the facts. Use the committee hub for C00343772 for registration details and receipt types outside this employer filter.
Is FORBES INC the same as Forbes Media or Forbes magazine?
Only if the grouped employer text is FORBES INC. Other legal and brand names are other keys if stored separately. This page does not recode those variants into the $7,057,500. Figures are limited to the labeled join.

FEC.gov aggregates of itemized individual contributions grouped by employer/industry and recipient committee. Not independent expenditures.