Fund Management political money — 2012 cycle

Fund Management as occupation, 2012 as the cycle

Two FEC fields define the cell: occupation FUND MANAGEMENT and election cycle 2012. Matching rows sum to $116,850, 25 contributions, and 3 donors. The occupation hub is $6,052,734 across every cycle in the aggregate. The 2012 cycle hub mixes every other occupation that used that year. Neither hub restates this intersection; this tie page exists because the two dimensions meet. Three unique donor keys produced 25 receipts totaling $116,850 in 2012 (1.9% of $6,052,734). This JSON does not name those three identities. Fund Manager as a person title is another key.

2012’s dollar share is 1.9% ($116,850 of $6,052,734). The remainder, $5,935,884, sits in other cycles on the occupation hub. 25 lines from 3 donors—about 8.3 gifts per person—is arithmetic on the packet, not a unique-person headcount of everyone who held the job. Correlation between a job title and a two-year FEC window is a reporting overlap, not causation of an election outcome. Itemized individual receipts are the coverage. Unitemized money never appears in $116,850.

Fund Management’s 2012 share of the lifetime string

The grouping’s stored total across cycles is $6,052,734. The 2012 slice of $116,850 is about 1.9% of that running sum. Other even-year windows hold the remaining 98.1%. Treating 2012 as the entire Fund Management FEC story would ignore that remainder.

Treat $6,052,734 as the denominator for the 1.9% share. It is not market capitalization, not revenue, and not proof of a multi-year political program. The occupation hub is the year index for this string. This tie keeps 2012 from being folded silently into $6,052,734.

3 donors and about 8.3 gifts per donor

Dividing $116,850 by 25 contributions yields about $4,674 per gift. Dividing by 3 donors yields about $38,950 per donor. Gifts per donor average about 8.3 (25 ÷ 3). Those ratios describe this string in 2012, not payroll at firms that employ people with similar titles.

3 is a donor-key count inside the occupation × cycle aggregate, not a headcount of everyone who held the job in 2012. Repeat itemization, couples filing separately, and people who used the string on some receipts but not others all move the 3 figure.

What 1.9% of Fund Management-coded dollars is not

A 1.9% share of Fund Management-coded dollars from 2012 does not mean the occupation caused those gifts, and it does not mean people with that title funded a policy outcome. Occupation and cycle are reported together. The overlap is descriptive. Independent expenditures, committee-to-committee transfers, and unitemized gifts are out of scope.

Federal awards on USAspending.gov are a different ledger. This join does not claim that 2012 donations funded contracts or grants. Quote $116,850 as itemized individual receipts tagged FUND MANAGEMENT in 2012, source FEC.gov, and stop there.

The 1.9% ratio is $116,850 divided by $6,052,734. Other even-year joins for FUND MANAGEMENT are not listed in this packet; they collectively hold $5,935,884. Citing 2012 as if it were the Fund Management lifetime total would overstate this cell by $5,935,884.

A mean of $4,674 per itemized line and $38,950 per donor can hide a few large receipts. The packet supplies no median. 25 contributions remaining larger than 3 donors is the expected pattern when identities give more than once.

How to cite Fund Management × 2012

A complete claim names Fund Management and 2012, then $116,850, 25 contributions, 3 donors, and 1.9% of $6,052,734, source FEC.gov. Do not convert 3 keys into licensed practitioners. Do not fold independent expenditures or USAspending awards into the cell. Keep both sides of the name—Fund Management and 2012—whenever the dollars are quoted. Mean gift $4,674 and mean per donor $38,950 travel with those counts.

FEC cycle 2012 tags a two-year window. Odd-year receipts inside that window are in $116,850 if they were itemized against FUND MANAGEMENT. This file does not publish a year-by-year split because the facts do not.

Fund manager, asset management, investment management, and money manager remain other occupation keys if stored separately. They are not inside $116,850 or $6,052,734 unless the stored string was exactly FUND MANAGEMENT.

Occupation hub, 2012 hub, and neighboring titles

The occupation hub still holds $5,935,884 outside 2012. Most of the $6,052,734 roll is not this cycle’s cell. Fund manager, asset management, investment management, and money manager are other occupation keys if stored separately. Those titles are not parents of FUND MANAGEMENT on this page. Gifts per donor in 2012 average about 8.3. That ratio is 25 divided by 3, not a measure of turnout.

Quote both keys: Fund Management and 2012. Quote the dollars: $116,850. Quote the volume: 25 contributions, 3 donors. Quote the source: FEC.gov. Leave USAspending dollars and named donors out.

Questions

How much did Fund Management-tagged donors give in 2012?

The join records $116,850 in itemized individual contributions for occupation Fund Management in the 2012 FEC cycle, from 25 contributions and 3 donors. The occupation’s all-cycle total is $6,052,734, so 2012 is 1.9% of that roll. Figures come from FEC.gov aggregates. Occupation labels are filer-entered.

What share of Fund Management FEC money is 2012?

The grouping’s all-cycle total is $6,052,734. The 2012 cell of $116,850 is about 1.9% of that figure. Other cycles hold the remaining 98.1% ($5,935,884) on the occupation hub. Do not treat 2012 as the whole Fund Management story. Figures come from FEC.gov aggregates by occupation and cycle.

Does this count every fund management who donated in 2012?

No. The 3 donor keys are people whose itemized receipts grouped to FUND MANAGEMENT in 2012. Filers who used a different title are other occupation rows. FEC.gov does not verify jobs. The cell totals $116,850 on 25 lines. Unitemized gifts never appear in this aggregate. Fund manager, asset management, investment management, and money manager are other keys if stored separately.

Where are the live Fund Management and 2012 tables?

Fund Management donations carries the $6,052,734 occupation total. The 2012 election cycle hub places Fund Management beside other occupation strings that year. All occupations and All FEC ties list sibling joins. Original filings remain at FEC.gov. This tie page is the Fund Management × 2012 intersection only.