Skip to main content
← All data ties

Geologist political contributions from Ft Worth, TX

Ft Worth, TX filers who stored GEOLOGIST reported $21,200 on 14 itemized individual gifts from 2 donors. Against $16,004,978 of all-industry Ft Worth dollars (42,821 city-field contributions), the grouping is 0.13%. Dollar figures first. Occupation string on the industry side; filer-entered city on the geography side. FEC.gov is the source.

Key figures

  • $21,200 from 2 donors and 14 receipts is the Geologist × Ft Worth, TX join.
  • $16,004,978 is the all-industry Ft Worth, TX book; this string is 0.13% of that book.
  • GEOLOGIST is an exact filer-entered label, not a sector roll-up.
  • Means near $1,514 per receipt and $10,600 per donor are arithmetic only.
  • If the live hub disagrees, the newer FEC extract controls.

Why this page is not the Ft Worth hub

Ft Worth, TX × Geologist is $21,200. That sentence needs both nouns. Drop Ft Worth and you are on the industry hub. Drop Geologist and you are on the city hub. Keep both. 14 receipts, 2 donors, city book $16,004,978 (42,821 lines), share 0.13%.

Public records, not accusations. $21,200 does not show that Geologist controls Ft Worth. Two fields matched. Recipients can be committees anywhere in the FEC system. An TX city code is an address field.

GEOLOGIST is stored as an occupation string on the itemization, not a NAICS sector and not every related job title. Other spellings of the employer or occupation are other keys and are omitted from $21,200. The stored city is FT WORTH, not FORT WORTH. Those two strings are separate city pages in this extract.

How 0.13% sits inside Ft Worth

City-field volume (42,821) and join volume (14) are different counts. 42,821 is every itemized individual line that stored FT WORTH. 14 is the subset that also stored GEOLOGIST. Dollar counterparts are $16,004,978 and $21,200. Quote pairs, not isolated percentages.

The stored city is FT WORTH, not FORT WORTH. Those two strings are separate city pages in this extract. Texas campaign finance still mixes Ft Worth with every other TX city. This join does not. Recipient location is not in these facts.

a 2-donor cluster under Geologist

A 2-donor cluster produced 14 itemized lines totaling $21,200 under grouping GEOLOGIST in Ft Worth. That is the industry-side description inside the city filter. It is not a claim about how many people in Ft Worth work in a related trade. Employment statistics are not in the packet.

GEOLOGIST is stored as an occupation string on the itemization, not a NAICS sector and not every related job title. Parent entities, divisions, and misspellings are other pages. $21,200 does not include them.

This URL (/ties/geologist-donors-in-tx-ft-worth/) is only Geologist in Ft Worth, TX. The city hub still mixes every employer string into $16,004,978. The industry hub still mixes every city. This JSON is the intersection copy only.

Stored keys are city FT WORTH, state TX, grouping GEOLOGIST. Display names Ft Worth and Geologist are for readers. Aggregates follow the stored keys. Nearby spellings are other pages and are omitted from $21,200.

Filer-entered labels, exact match

Means near $1,514 per receipt and $10,600 per donor omit medians because medians are not in the packet. Unique-person counts beyond 2 are omitted for the same reason. Row counts can repeat households.

City FT WORTH is filer-entered. Grouping GEOLOGIST is filer-entered. Together they are a join. The stored city is FT WORTH, not FORT WORTH. Those two strings are separate city pages in this extract.

Raw integers behind the prose: grouping dollars 21,200, grouping receipts 14, harvested donors 2, city dollars 16,004,978, city-field contributions 42,821. Share 0.13% uses only the two dollar totals. Remainder of the city book is $15,983,778 (99.9%).

Where to go next on LobbyVault

After this tie, the city hub shows Ft Worth without GEOLOGIST as a required filter. The industry hub shows GEOLOGIST without FT WORTH as a required filter. The Texas page shows other cities. All FEC ties lists other two-dimension pages. This URL remains the intersection.

$21,200 from 2 donors on 14 receipts is the intersection's dollar-and-count signature. $16,004,978 / 42,821 is the city signature. Do not swap them in a citation.

Per-receipt mean about $1,514 is 21,200/14. Per-donor mean about $10,600 is 21,200/2. Receipts (14) and donors (2) differ when the same harvested donor appears on more than one itemized line. Both counts are packet facts.

Stored strings GEOLOGIST and FT WORTH

Remember the stored strings: city FT WORTH, state TX, grouping GEOLOGIST. Display names Ft Worth and Geologist are for readers. Aggregates follow the stored keys. The stored city is FT WORTH, not FORT WORTH. Those two strings are separate city pages in this extract.

$21,200, 14, 2, $16,004,978, 42,821, 0.13%: that is the numeric payload. Source: FEC.gov individual contribution aggregates by donor city and employer/industry grouping. City labels are filer-entered.

Texas pages still mix Ft Worth with every other TX city and mix GEOLOGIST with every other grouping. This tie does not. A citation that names $21,200 must also name Ft Worth, TX and Geologist, or it has described a hub.

Questions

How much did Geologist donors in Ft Worth, TX give?
Itemized FEC individual contributions storing industry grouping GEOLOGIST and city FT WORTH total $21,200 across 14 receipts from 2 donors in this extract. That is the city-and-industry join, not Ft Worth, TX's all-industry book of $16,004,978 on 42,821 contributions. Original reports remain on FEC.gov. Labels are filer-entered.
Does Geologist in Ft Worth include every related job title?
No. GEOLOGIST is the exact stored string on the itemization. Other employer spellings, parent names, and related job titles are other keys and are omitted from $21,200. 2 donors and 14 receipts follow that exact-match rule. LobbyVault does not map the field to a standardized occupation list or NAICS sector.
What share of Ft Worth, TX itemized money is Geologist?
$21,200 is 0.13% of the $16,004,978 Ft Worth, TX city book (42,821 city-field contributions). A thin share usually means other employer strings dominate the city tape, not that the grouping is absent from Ft Worth. Quote both dollars when citing the join. Do not upgrade 0.13% into a sector ranking or a Texas share.
Do Geologist donations in Ft Worth fund federal spending there?
No. These figures are FEC individual contributions, not USAspending awards. $21,200 does not become a contract or assistance award because both datasets can mention Ft Worth. Different statutes, different forms. This packet has no obligation dollars and no award counts. Filings remain on FEC.gov.

FEC.gov individual contribution aggregates by donor city and employer/industry grouping. City labels are filer-entered.