Gila River Indian Community and the 2014 FEC election cycle

Gila River Indian Community crossed with 2014

Employer groupings sit on one axis; election cycles sit on the other. Rows that match both — Gila River Indian Community and 2014 — sum to $627,700. 127 itemized contributions and 1 unique donor produced it. The total is not an official organization disbursement and does not name recipients. Independent expenditures and committee transfers live in other FEC tables.

Neither the Gila River Indian Community hub nor the 2014 election cycle hub is this number; each hub drops one of the two keys. One hundred twenty-seven 2014 lines on one donor key sit under the named tribal-government employer string. That is a concentrated cell, not a census of community members. The generic Indian Tribe occupation key is a different page. This join does not fold that generic bucket into Gila River. The generic INDIAN TRIBE string, GILA RIVER, and other named tribal governments are other keys. This page is the four-word Gila River Indian Community spelling.

15.7% of the Gila River Indian Community roll

The grouping’s stored total across cycles is $4,003,028 ($4.0 million). The 2014 slice of $627,700 is about 15.7% of that running sum. Other even-year windows hold the remaining 84.3%. Treating 2014 as the Gila River Indian Community FEC story would ignore that remainder.

Treat $4,003,028 as the denominator for the 15.7% share. It is not market capitalization, not revenue, and not proof of a multi-year political program. The industry hub is the year index for this string. This tie keeps 2014 from being folded silently into $4,003,028.

1 donor, 127 lines

127 receipts on 1 donor is a high lines-per-donor ratio: 127.0 on average. Dollars per line average about $4,943. Dollars per donor average about $627,700. That shape often appears when a small number of people give to many committees or when joint-fundraising receipts multiply Schedule A rows. The facts count the rows. They do not name the committees.

1 donor is a contributor identity, not a headcount of a payroll. Household members who reuse a workplace can appear. The Commission does not certify employment. Unitemized gifts never enter $627,700.

2014 as the cycle dimension

The 2014 election cycle hub includes every stored employer for that window. Gila River Indian Community is one cell in that matrix. This packet does not publish a cycle-wide denominator, so no national share is stated. Open the 2014 election cycle to drop the employer filter and Gila River Indian Community to drop the year.

Gifts from both years of the two-year FEC window sit in the $627,700 cell because the cycle is a two-year tag, not a single Tuesday. That mechanical fact is easy to forget when a searcher wants an election-night number. The overlay is where dates become visible. This join publishes the cycle total, the 127 contributions, the 1 unique donor, and the 15.7% share of $4,003,028.

Limits of the Gila River Indian Community × 2014 join

Itemized individual receipts are the universe. Unitemized gifts, independent expenditures, and PAC disbursements sit outside $627,700. Federal awards in other databases are different datasets. Sharing an employer string and a calendar year does not turn these gifts into contracts or grants. The page is not a tribal-gaming NAICS total and not a generic Indian Tribe recode.

Correlation between an employer or occupation string and a cycle year is not causation. The records show a text match, a date window, 1 donor, and 127 contributions. The generic INDIAN TRIBE string, GILA RIVER, and other named tribal governments are other keys. This page is the four-word Gila River Indian Community spelling. All FEC ties lists other two-dimension pages.

Citing Gila River Indian Community and 2014 together

Start with $627,700, then Gila River Indian Community 2014 for rows, then the industry hub or the 2014 election cycle if a filter needs to come off. Citation template: Gila River Indian Community, 2014, $627,700, 127 contributions, 1 donor, 15.7% of $4,003,028, source FEC.gov. Keep neighboring spellings and occupation titles out of the total unless they grouped to this exact string.

The 15.7% share, the 1-donor count, and the $4,943 mean gift belong to this intersection. Carry them onto a successor label or a sibling occupation word and they stop being facts from this packet. This prose is a packet snapshot. If a later extract disagrees, FEC.gov and the live overlay control.

Questions

How much did Gila River Indian Community donors give in 2014?

FEC.gov aggregates show $627,700 in itemized individual contributions for the Gila River Indian Community grouping in the 2014 cycle, across 127 contributions and 1 donor. That sum is not a PAC total and not the $4,003,028 all-cycle figure.

What share of Gila River Indian Community FEC money is 2014?

The grouping’s all-cycle total is $4,003,028. The 2014 cell of $627,700 is about 15.7% of that figure. Other cycles hold the remaining 84.3% on the industry hub. The overlay lists itemized rows for this cell; the Gila River Indian Community hub holds other cycles; the 2014 election cycle hub holds other employer strings from the same window.

Is this Gila River Indian Community’s PAC or an official account?

No. $627,700 is itemized individual receipts whose employer or occupation text grouped to Gila River Indian Community. Committee PAC filings and official organization accounts sit outside this rollup unless an individual receipt itself carries the string. The key is not a tribal-gaming NAICS total and not a generic Indian Tribe recode.

Where is the overlay for the Gila River Indian Community 2014 join?

Open Gila River Indian Community 2014 for the cycle overlay, Gila River Indian Community for the grouping hub, and the 2014 election cycle for the year without this employer filter. All FEC ties lists other two-dimension pages. This JSON file names the join; the overlay holds the itemized rows.