Skip to main content
← All data ties

Gulford Transportation contributions received by SLF PAC

Donors who listed Gulford Transportation as their employer sent $30,000,000 in itemized individual contributions to SLF PAC, according to FEC.gov aggregates. That committee total covers 224 contributions and sits against $100,813,470 attributed to the Gulford Transportation employer grouping nationwide. This page is a join: one employer/industry bucket on one side, one recipient committee (C00571703) on the other. It is not a claim that the firm itself wrote the checks, and it is not independent-expenditure spending.

Key figures

  • SLF PAC received $30,000,000 from Gulford Transportation-coded individual contributions across 224 itemized gifts.
  • The Gulford Transportation employer grouping totals $100,813,470, so this committee accounts for about 30% of that labeled money.
  • The spelling Gulford is stored as filed and is not recoded here.
  • Figures are FEC itemized individual contributions, not independent expenditures or DOT awards.

Keep the spelling Gulford, as filed

GULFORD TRANSPORTATION is the employer string in this table, including the vowel as stored. It may be a misspelling of Guilford, a truncated field, or a distinct entity. LobbyVault does not correct it. The grouping totals $100,813,470. SLF PAC, committee C00571703, received $30,000,000 of that grouping across 224 contributions—about 30% of the employer total.

A 30% share is a large slice that is still a minority of the string. About $70,813,470 of Gulford Transportation-coded money went to other committees. The industry hub is therefore the majority view. This tie is the SLF PAC minority slice, not a synonym for the whole $100,813,470.

224 lines averaging about $133,929

Two hundred twenty-four itemized contributions totaling $30,000,000 average about $133,929 per line. Unique donors are not in the facts. Transportation as a word in the employer field is not a NAICS freight sector. Trucking, rail, and logistics firms typed under other names sit in other keys.

Hampton Event and Wellington Assoc also meet SLF PAC on separate URLs. Those joins use different employer totals. Do not add $30,000,000 to those cells on this page. Each filter is its own intersection with C00571703.

SLF PAC as a 30% destination, not the home page

Because most of the $100,813,470 sits elsewhere, describing Gulford Transportation as an SLF PAC employer would overstate the join. The accurate sentence is that $30,000,000 of the grouping, on 224 lines, is coded to C00571703. The committee hub shows SLF PAC receipts from every employer, including strings that send a higher share of their own totals.

Independent expenditures by SLF PAC are outside $30,000,000. Operating expenditures are outside it. Keep the source note: itemized individual contributions grouped by employer and recipient committee.

Freight labels are not highway awards

FEC receipts do not fund Federal Highway Administration or DOT awards on USAspending. A transportation employer string and a transportation NAICS in a contract file are different datasets. Correlation of the word transportation is not causation.

Motive, shipping regulation, and Super PAC ads are outside the packet. Unitemized gifts never appear. Cite $30,000,000, 224 contributions, $100,813,470, and C00571703. Leave the spelling as Gulford unless a different key exists for Guilford.

Linked hubs

The Gulford Transportation industry page holds the $100,813,470 employer total and the committees that received the other 70%. The SLF PAC page holds C00571703 receipts from every employer. All industries and all FEC ties collect neighboring pairs, including other SLF PAC employer joins, without mixing independent expenditures into this 224-line cell.

29.8 percent is $30,000,000 of $100,813,470. The leftover $70,813,470 is Gulford Transportation-coded money on other committees—the majority of the string. 224 lines at about $133,929 each are the SLF PAC slice only. Guilford as a different spelling is another key if it exists.

Hampton Event, Wellington Assoc, and Doctor also meet C00571703. Those joins are not additive here. Independent expenditures by SLF PAC are outside $30,000,000. Unique donors are not listed. Keep Gulford as filed.

Cite FEC.gov. Keep Gulford as filed. Transportation in the employer field is not a NAICS freight sector and not a DOT award. Do not treat 29.8% as proof a carrier directed the PAC. The industry hub remains the place to see where the other share of $100,813,470 went.

Researchers who need names behind the 224 contribution lines must leave this prose page for the committee and industry tables. This tie only publishes the overlap: $30,000,000 coded to GULFORD TRANSPORTATION and received by SLF PAC (C00571703), against an employer grouping of $100,813,470. About 30% of that grouping is here; $70,813,470 is not. Dollars per line average about $133,929. That ratio is arithmetic on the packet facts, not a typical gift and not a legal finding. Unitemized receipts, independent expenditures, and USAspending awards remain outside the join. Cite FEC.gov. The Gulford spelling stays as filed.

Questions

How much did Gulford Transportation donors give SLF PAC?
FEC.gov aggregates of itemized individual contributions show $30,000,000 coded to the Gulford Transportation employer grouping and received by SLF PAC (C00571703). That join covers 224 contributions. The broader Gulford Transportation employer total across all committees is $100,813,470. These figures are not independent expenditures.
Is Gulford a misspelling of Guilford Transportation?
This page does not recode the string. GULFORD TRANSPORTATION is stored as filed. A Guilford key, if it exists, is a different grouping. This join reports $30,000,000 to C00571703 from the Gulford spelling only. It does not verify the legal employer name or employment.
What share of Gulford Transportation FEC money went to SLF PAC?
About 30% of the $100,813,470 Gulford Transportation employer total is in this join: $30,000,000 to SLF PAC. About $70,813,470 went to other committees. That minority share describes overlap of two FEC groupings, not a finding that the firm’s political activity is this PAC.
Does this include SLF PAC independent expenditures?
No. The source is FEC.gov aggregates of itemized individual contributions grouped by employer/industry and recipient committee. Independent expenditures and operating costs are outside this join. Use the C00571703 committee hub for other receipt and spending types not in this employer filter.

FEC.gov aggregates of itemized individual contributions grouped by employer/industry and recipient committee. Not independent expenditures.