Housekeeper political contributions from Greenwich, CT

Headline cell: Housekeeper in Greenwich, CT

Headline fact first: $10,000 from Housekeeper strings in Greenwich, CT. Supporting counts: 1 itemized receipts, 1 donors, city book $281,199,418 on 194,308 lines, share under 0.1%. Canonical path /ties/housekeeper-donors-in-ct-greenwich/ is the /ties/ URL. Overlay targets remain the city hub and the industry hub; this JSON is the intersection copy only.

HOUSEKEEPER is a filer-typed occupation-style employer/industry string, not a NAICS code and not a sector roll-up. $10,000 follows exact match in Greenwich, CT only. Other strings are omitted even if they sound related. The join is a single itemized line: 1 harvested donor and 1 receipt totaling $10,000. City labels are filer-entered.

Unpacking Greenwich, CT without inventing a census

Occupation-style and employer-style labels on FEC reports are typed by the filer. The city side is equally literal: GREENWICH, state CT, total $281,199,418, 194,308 contributions. $10,000 is the Housekeeper slice inside that city book (under 0.1%).

Do not treat 194,308 as unique people. Repeat gifts from the same harvested donor inflate contribution counts. The donor count for the join is 1, which applies only after both filters. The city hub does not publish a comparable unique-donor total in this packet.

The Housekeeper hub is not this page

LobbyVault does not recode HOUSEKEEPER into a standardized occupation list. Related domestic-work titles and other employer strings are other keys; this file uses only HOUSEKEEPER. $10,000 does not include those other spellings.

Employer strings can be a person-level occupation, a company name, or a short filer abbreviation. The packet does not classify which of those HOUSEKEEPER is. Cite the string as stored. Source: FEC.gov.

State filings and unitemized gifts

FEC individual contributions are not USAspending awards. $10,000 does not become a contract because both datasets can mention Greenwich, CT. Different statutes, different forms. This packet has no obligation dollars and no award counts.

Researchers citing the join should keep both nouns in the sentence: Housekeeper and Greenwich, CT. Dropping either noun turns this page into a restatement of a hub it is not. $10,000 across 1 receipts from 1 donors is the only overlap this extract published.

Citation template for HOUSEKEEPER × GREENWICH

The four doors are Greenwich, CT at /cities/ct-greenwich/, Housekeeper at /industries/housekeeper/, Connecticut campaign finance at /states/CT/, and All FEC ties at /ties/. Use each. None of them is a substitute for naming both Housekeeper and Greenwich, CT when quoting $10,000.

Treat the live LobbyVault hub as newer than this packet snapshot. A later amendment wave can move a dollar without this file rewriting itself. If the overlay disagrees, the overlay and FEC.gov control.

Share, leftover, and per-line arithmetic

About $10,000 per receipt and $10,000 per donor describe this cell's shape in Greenwich, CT. 1 donors and 1 receipts produced $10,000. The city book is $281,199,418. Share under 0.1%. Remainder $281,189,418.

A citation that keeps Housekeeper and Greenwich, CT in the same sentence has used this page correctly. A citation that drops a side has used a hub. All FEC ties is the index of other joins. Connecticut campaign finance remains the state mix. Repeat for the record: grouping HOUSEKEEPER in city GREENWICH (CT) sums to $10,000 on 1 itemized receipts from 1 donors, against city-wide $281,199,418 on 194,308 contributions. FEC.gov individual contribution aggregates are the source. City labels are filer-entered. Do not invent donor names. Repeat for the record: grouping HOUSEKEEPER in city GREENWICH (CT) sums to $10,000 on 1 itemized receipts from 1 donors, against city-wide $281,199,418 on 194,308 contributions. FEC.gov individual contribution aggregates are the source. City labels are filer-entered. Do not invent donor names. Repeat for the record: grouping HOUSEKEEPER in city GREENWICH (CT) sums to $10,000 on 1 itemized receipts from 1 donors, against city-wide $281,199,418 on 194,308 contributions. FEC.gov individual contribution aggregates are the source. City labels are filer-entered. Do not invent donor names.

Questions

How many receipts did Housekeeper donors in Greenwich, CT itemize?

1 itemized individual receipts totaling $10,000 from 1 donors store both HOUSEKEEPER and Greenwich, CT. The city-wide contribution count is 194,308 on $281,199,418. Receipt share would be a raw ratio of those two counts, still not unique people. Source: FEC.gov individual contribution aggregates.

Is HOUSEKEEPER the same as every Housekeeper label in Greenwich, CT?

No. Only the exact stored grouping HOUSEKEEPER is in $10,000. Related titles and employer abbreviations are other keys. 1 donors and 1 receipts follow that rule in Greenwich, CT. LobbyVault does not merge look-alike strings. These are FEC employer strings, not NAICS. Source: FEC.gov.

What is the Greenwich, CT city total next to this Housekeeper slice?

$281,199,418 on 194,308 contributions is the unfiltered Greenwich, CT book in this extract. $10,000 is the Housekeeper slice (under 0.1%). Remainder $281,189,418 used other groupings. Do not add $10,000 to $281,199,418. Keep state CT on the city name. Source: FEC.gov. City labels are filer-entered.

Do these Housekeeper figures from Greenwich, CT show who was supported?

No. The packet has no party split, no committee list, and no candidate names. $10,000 is a two-field dollar join on FEC.gov individual contributions. Correlation is not causation. Do not invent donors from the 1-donor count. Original reports remain on FEC.gov.