Skip to main content
← All data ties

Investment Management occupation money in the 2010 FEC cycle

Investment Management as an occupation string and 2010 as an FEC election cycle meet at $648,361 in itemized individual receipts. The harvested cell is 330 lines and 200 donor keys. Across every cycle in the occupation aggregate the same title is $11,262,515; 2010 is 5.8%. Cite FEC.gov. The overlap is a reporting join, not an AUM census, an SEC adviser list, or a fund-officer roster.

Key figures

  • Investment Management in 2010: $648,361 on 330 itemized lines.
  • 200 donor keys; about 1.6 gifts per donor and $3,242 per donor.
  • Remainder outside 2010: $10,614,154 of $11,262,515.
  • Not an AUM census, an SEC adviser list, or a fund-officer roster.
  • FEC.gov individual contribution aggregates; labels are filer-entered.

The Investment Management and 2010 join

Two FEC fields define the cell: occupation INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT and election cycle 2010. Matching rows sum to $648,361, 330 contributions, and 200 donors. INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT is a shop-style occupation string. It is not a firm AUM figure. FEC.gov does not verify a fund, a strategy, or an adviser registration. The occupation hub is $11,262,515 across every cycle in the aggregate. The 2010 cycle hub mixes every other occupation that used that year. Neither hub restates this intersection; this tie page exists because the two dimensions meet.

2010’s dollar share is 5.8% ($648,361 of $11,262,515). The remainder, $10,614,154, sits in other cycles on the occupation hub. 200 donor keys and 330 lines describe this midterm-cycle cell. Correlation between a job title and a two-year FEC window is a reporting overlap, not causation of an election outcome. Itemized individual receipts are the coverage. Unitemized money never appears in $648,361.

What the INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT string covers

$11,262,515 is the occupation-side denominator. It is not limited to 2010. Investment Manager, Asset Management, and Portfolio Manager are other occupation keys if stored separately. Adding those keys to $11,262,515 would be a researcher-built recode, not this table. Occupation labels are filer-entered on itemized individual receipts. INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT is a shop-style occupation string. It is not a firm AUM figure. FEC.gov does not verify a fund, a strategy, or an adviser registration.

Open Investment Management donations for the $11,262,515 roll. Open the 2010 election cycle hub for every occupation in that window. All occupations and All FEC ties place this pair beside other occupation-cycle pages without combining dollar figures. A 5.8% year share of this occupation total means the rest of the labeled money sits outside 2010.

Itemized lines, donor keys, and 2010

Dividing $648,361 by 330 contributions yields about $1,965 per gift. Dividing by 200 donors yields about $3,242 per donor. Gifts per donor average about 1.6 (330 ÷ 200). Those ratios describe this string in 2010, not payroll at firms that employ people with similar titles, and not an SEC adviser list or a Morningstar firm file.

200 is a donor-key count inside the occupation × cycle aggregate, not a headcount of everyone who held the job in 2010. Repeat itemization, couples filing separately, and people who used the string on some receipts but not others all move the 200 figure. The cycle hub still holds every other occupation’s 2010 receipts beside this cell. People who left occupation blank or used a nearby spelling are not in $648,361.

Correlation is not causation for Investment Management in 2010

A 5.8% share of Investment Management-coded dollars from 2010 does not mean the occupation caused those gifts, and it does not mean people with that title funded a policy outcome. Occupation and cycle are reported together. The overlap is descriptive. Independent expenditures, committee-to-committee transfers, and unitemized gifts are out of scope.

Federal awards on USAspending.gov are a different ledger. This join does not claim that 2010 donations funded contracts or grants. Quote $648,361 as itemized individual receipts tagged INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT in 2010, source FEC.gov, and stop there. Correlation is not causation.

Quoting $648,361 without mixing tables

A complete claim names Investment Management and 2010, then $648,361, 330 contributions, 200 donors, and 5.8% of $11,262,515, source FEC.gov. Do not convert 200 keys into licensed or employed practitioners. Do not fold independent expenditures or USAspending awards into the cell. Keep both sides of the name—Investment Management and 2010—whenever the dollars are quoted. Mean gift $1,965 and mean per donor $3,242 travel with those counts; they do not travel with an SEC adviser list or a Morningstar firm file.

This URL exists because two filters meet. Investment Management donations rolls every cycle into one INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT running total. The 2010 election cycle rolls every occupation into one 2010 total. Only the Investment Management × 2010 overlay applies both filters, which is why this page cites 330 receipts and $648,361. All FEC ties is the directory of other occupation-cycle cells.

Investment Manager and other neighboring keys

The occupation hub still holds $10,614,154 outside 2010. Most of the $11,262,515 roll is not this cycle’s cell when 5.8% is the year share. Investment Manager, Asset Management, and Portfolio Manager are other occupation keys if stored separately. Those titles are not parents of INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT on this page. Gifts per donor in 2010 average about 1.6.

Midterm cycles still use the same occupation string. What 2010 changes is the window, not the spelling of INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT. Keep Investment Management in the title and the H1 so the page is not mistaken for a generic 2010 roundup.

Questions

What is the Investment Management × 2010 dollar total?
The join records $648,361 in itemized individual contributions for occupation Investment Management in the 2010 FEC cycle, from 330 contributions and 200 donors. The occupation’s all-cycle total is $11,262,515, so 2010 is 5.8% of that roll. Figures come from FEC.gov aggregates. Occupation labels are filer-entered.
Is Investment Management the same as Investment Manager?
No. This cell is the exact string INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT. Investment Manager, Asset Management, and Portfolio Manager are other occupation keys. Combining those keys with $11,262,515 would be a recode. The 2010 overlap remains $648,361 on 330 lines from 200 donors, source FEC.gov.
Did Investment Management donations pay for federal awards in 2010?
No. FEC individual contributions and USAspending.gov awards are different datasets. This page does not claim that $648,361 tagged Investment Management in 2010 funded contracts or grants. The cell is 330 itemized receipts from 200 donors, 5.8% of $11,262,515. Quote the occupation-cycle join only. Source FEC.gov.
Where are the live Investment Management and 2010 tables?
Investment Management donations carries the $11,262,515 occupation total. The 2010 election cycle hub places Investment Management beside other occupation strings that year. All occupations and All FEC ties list sibling joins. Original filings remain at FEC.gov. This tie page is the Investment Management × 2010 intersection only.

FEC.gov individual contribution aggregates by self-reported occupation and election cycle. Occupation labels are filer-entered.