Investment Management political contributions from Connecticut

INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT joined to Connecticut donor state

Occupation INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT and donor state CT produce $1,260,496, 889 contributions, and 96 donors. The occupation hub is $11,262,515, 8,930 contributions, and 1,184 donors. Connecticut’s dollar share is about 11.2% ($1,260,496 of $11,262,515). Its contribution share is about 10.0% (889 of 8,930). Its donor share is about 8.1% (96 of 1,184).

The three shares sit in a relatively tight band from about 8% to 11%. That is a broader unique-person slice than seven-donor analyst cells. Ninety-six Connecticut donors produced about a tenth of occupation dollars.

INVESTMENT MANAGER, PORTFOLIO MANAGER, and INVESTMENT ANALYST are other keys. They are not inside $11,262,515 unless grouped here. This packet does not claim that grouping.

An industry-sounding phrase stored as occupation

INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT can be a department name, a firm type, or a job the filer summarized in two words. FEC individual receipts store occupation as free text. The aggregate does not recode it to NAICS 523 or to a Form ADV adviser list. One thousand one hundred eighty-four national donors used the string.

Eight thousand nine hundred thirty contributions from 1,184 donors nationwide is about 8 itemized gifts per donor. Connecticut’s 889 contributions from 96 donors is about 9 gifts per donor. Receipt frequency is similar. Dollar share (11.2%) still slightly exceeds donor share (8.1%).

Connecticut cell averages

Dividing $1,260,496 by 889 contributions yields about $1,418 per gift. Dividing by 96 donors yields about $13,130 per donor. Nationally, $11,262,515 divided by 8,930 contributions is about $1,261 per gift. Connecticut’s mean is close to the national occupation mean. This cell is not an outlier on gift size the way Idaho PRESIDENT AND CEO is.

Donor state CT is the address on the receipt. Recipients need not be Connecticut committees. Fairfield County geography is often associated with asset management in public discussion; that association is not a fact in this packet and is not used here as a causal claim.

Ninety-six Connecticut donors produced 889 contributions, about 9 itemized gifts per person, matching the national 8. Frequency is not distinctive. The 11.2% dollar share above the 8.1% donor share is a modest mean-gift premium (about $1,418 versus about $1,261 nationally), not a seven-person blowout.

What 11.2% does not prove

Connecticut’s share of Investment Management-coded dollars is a table split. It is not evidence that Connecticut caused those gifts, that asset managers as a class funded a party, or that campaign receipts relate to federal awards. FEC individual contributions and USAspending are different ledgers.

Coverage is itemized individual contributions from FEC.gov. Unitemized money and independent expenditures are out of scope. Occupation labels are filer-entered.

INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT reads like a department or a firm type. On FEC individual receipts it is still an occupation string. It does not join to Form ADV, to NAICS 523, or to USAspending awards that happen to name an asset manager as a vendor.

Occupation hub, state hub, neighboring finance titles

Investment Management donations carries the $11,262,515 national occupation total. Connecticut campaign finance carries all CT-coded itemized individual activity. All occupations and All FEC ties keep this pair beside other finance occupation-state pages without adding their dollar figures together.

The occupation hub still holds $10,002,019 outside Connecticut ($11,262,515 minus $1,260,496). Use Investment Management donations for that remainder. Connecticut campaign finance holds every other CT-coded title. This page holds only the overlap.

An 11% slice that is not a firm directory

Ninety-six donors, 889 contributions, and $1,260,496 are the Connecticut cell. Those counts are close enough to proportional that this join does not need a concentration warning as strong as Oregon’s eight Law Professor donors. It still needs a labeling warning: INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT is occupation text, not a firm directory.

The other $10,002,019 lives on the occupation hub. Connecticut campaign finance still mixes attorneys, executives, and every other CT-coded title with this one.

Questions

How much have Investment Management donors in Connecticut given?

FEC itemized individual contributions from donors listing occupation Investment Management and state Connecticut total $1,260,496, from 889 contributions and 96 donors. Nationwide, Investment Management-coded receipts are $11,262,515 from 8,930 contributions and 1,184 donors. Connecticut is about 11.2% of those dollars.

Does Investment Management mean registered investment advisers in Connecticut?

INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT is the occupation text as entered on itemized filings. FEC aggregates do not verify SEC or state registration. The 96 Connecticut donors and 1,184 national donors are people whose records used that phrase, not a Form ADV headcount.

How does Connecticut’s share of donors compare with dollars?

About 8.1% of Investment Management-coded donors (96 of 1,184) and about 10.0% of contributions (889 of 8,930) sit in this Connecticut join, alongside about 11.2% of the dollars ($1,260,496 of $11,262,515). The shares are close relative to more concentrated cells.

Is this money given to Connecticut candidates?

Not necessarily. CT is the donor state on the contribution. The $1,260,496 can be received by any FEC-filing committee. This page does not break receipts by office or by in-state versus out-of-state committees.