Investment Manager political contributions from Connecticut

Investment Manager in Connecticut versus the national table

Occupation INVESTMENT MANAGER and donor state CT produce $2,549,115, 1,180 contributions, and 154 donors. The occupation hub is $23,820,299, 15,309 contributions, and 1,789 donors. Connecticut’s dollar share is about 11%; contribution share about 8% (1,180 of 15,309); donor share about 9% (154 of 1,789).

Dollar share (about 11%) runs a little ahead of contribution share (about 8%). The Connecticut-coded slice is somewhat heavier per row than the national mix. Massachusetts has a separate Investment Manager tie with its own packet facts—similar in theme, not a combined corridor total. Other states remain inside the $23,820,299.

One hundred fifty-four Connecticut donors produced 1,180 contributions, about eight itemized rows per donor in this join, versus about nine rows per donor nationally (15,309 contributions from 1,789 donors). Connecticut holds about 11% of the $23,820,299 with about 9% of the donors. Dollar share a bit ahead of contribution share means somewhat heavier rows, not a 15-person outlier.

Investment Manager beside Finance and Investment Banker

Connecticut also has Finance and Investment Banker ties that use different occupation strings. Each uses a different occupation string. A Greenwich filer who wrote FINANCE is not in this $2,549,115. The $23,820,299 national Investment Manager total is likewise only this label.

One thousand seven hundred eighty-nine donors nationwide produced 15,309 Investment Manager-coded contributions. This page locates the Connecticut overlap.

Connecticut as donor state

One hundred fifty-four Connecticut donors produced 1,180 contributions totaling $2,549,115. Donor state CT is the address on the record, not proof of a Connecticut-registered adviser, and not a limit to Connecticut candidates.

The Connecticut campaign-finance hub includes every occupation coded to CT. This join is only INVESTMENT MANAGER.

Connecticut Finance and Investment Banker ties share the CT code, not this occupation string. The Investment Manager occupation hub without Connecticut still holds about 89% of the $23,820,299. Massachusetts has a parallel Investment Manager tie; the two are not a corridor total.

Caveats

This page does not measure hedge-fund assets, does not identify firms, and does not claim that Investment Manager-coded money caused any electoral result. Occupation plus state is a bookkeeping join. Correlation is not causation.

Itemized individual contributions only. Unitemized receipts and independent expenditures are omitted. FEC.gov is the source. Occupation labels are filer-entered.

INVESTMENT MANAGER is not a hedge-fund AUM table. Itemized individual contributions only. Unitemized gifts and independent expenditures are omitted. Employer and recipient committee are different fields. Donor state CT is not proof of a Connecticut-registered adviser. Correlation is not causation.

Connecticut’s $2,549,115 is the INVESTMENT MANAGER-and-CT overlap only, not a sum of every finance-adjacent label coded to the state.

Reading Investment Manager and Connecticut as two keys

Subtract the Connecticut dollars on this page from the national Investment Manager occupation total and the difference is the amount still coded Investment Manager in every other state combined. That remainder has no row-by-row breakdown here because those states are other ties. The occupation internal link holds the unlabeled-by-state total; the state internal link holds every occupation with this state code; the occupations index and the ties index place this pair among other joins built the same way.

A unique-donor count is not a person-level audit. The FEC aggregate can merge similar names or split one person who filed under variants. A contribution count can be many small itemized rows. A dollar total can hide that skew. Keeping all three figures on the same page is the point of the join: quoting only the Connecticut dollars, or only the Investment Manager national total, drops a key.

This relationship is not a forecast and not a ranking of influence. Occupation does not cause contributions, and donor state does not cause recipient geography. Public records, two fields, one intersection. FEC.gov individual contribution aggregates; occupation labels are filer-entered.

Related hubs

Investment Manager donations holds the $23,820,299 national occupation total. Connecticut campaign finance holds the state’s itemized individual activity across occupations. All occupations and all FEC ties collect other occupation-state pairs from the same two fields.

Questions

How much have Investment Manager donors in Connecticut given?

FEC itemized individual contributions from donors listing occupation Investment Manager and state Connecticut total $2,549,115, from 1,180 contributions and 154 donors. Nationwide, Investment Manager-coded receipts are $23,820,299 from 15,309 contributions and 1,789 donors. Connecticut is about 11% of those dollars.

Can I add Connecticut and Massachusetts Investment Manager totals?

You can read each join on its own facts. Connecticut is $2,549,115 (1,180 contributions, 154 donors); Massachusetts is a separate Investment Manager tie with its own facts. Adding them is not a complete regional total, because other states remain inside the $23,820,299 national figure.

Does this include people who wrote Finance or Investment Banker?

No. Those are different occupation strings. Connecticut has separate Finance and Investment Banker ties. This page’s 154 donors and $2,549,115 are INVESTMENT MANAGER-and-CT only.

Is this money for Connecticut candidates?

Not necessarily. Donor state is Connecticut. Recipients can be any FEC-filing committee. This page does not allocate the $2,549,115 by office or by in-state versus out-of-state campaigns.