Investments political contributions from Beverly Hills, CA
Filers who listed Investments and Beverly Hills, CA on FEC.gov itemized individual contributions reported $32,500 across 27 receipts from 9 donors. Beverly Hills as a whole indexes $243,943,527 across 325,245 itemized contributions. The Investments slice is under 0.1% of the city dollar total. Those figures share a filer-entered city label; they are not a claim that the grouping runs the city’s politics.
Key figures
- Investments in Beverly Hills, CA: $32,500 on 27 receipts from 9 donors.
- Beverly Hills city-wide FEC itemized total: $243,943,527 on 325,245 contributions.
- The Investments slice is under 0.1% of Beverly Hills dollars — a labeled subset, not the city book.
- INVESTMENTS is an exact filer-entered label, not a sector roll-up.
- City labels are filer-entered. The join is not a federal-award trail.
How Investments meets Beverly Hills
This page is a join. One dimension is contributor city Beverly Hills, CA. The other is occupation or industry grouping Investments (stored as INVESTMENTS). $32,500 is the intersection — dollars on receipts that carry both labels. $243,943,527 is the city bucket before the employer filter, built from 325,245 itemized lines. The harvested donor count inside the intersection is 9 donors, not a census of everyone in Beverly Hills who ever worked in a related trade.
LobbyVault does not add a third table and does not route these dollars through USAspending. A Form 3 itemization is not a federal award. Open the Beverly Hills, CA city hub for the unfiltered city book, the Investments industry hub for the grouping outside this city filter, California campaign finance for the state roll-up, and All FEC ties for sibling joins. Each of those pages answers a different question. This one answers only the intersection.
27 contributions from 9 donors produced $32,500. Repeat gifts add receipts; 9 donors is the headcount in this extract for the join, not a Census of Investments workers in Beverly Hills. Arithmetic mean per receipt is about $1,204; per donor, about $3,611. Those means are division of packet facts, not typical salaries and not medians.
What the Beverly Hills city book holds
Beverly Hills indexes $243,943,527 ($244 million rounded) on 325,245 itemized individual contributions. City labels are filer-entered. A suburb that types a different city never enters $243,943,527. Joint-fundraising and committee addresses that happen to list Beverly Hills can sit in the same bucket as residents. The packet does not publish a unique-donor count for the city as a whole, so this page does not invent one from 325,245.
California campaign-finance pages cover the state, which is a larger geography than Beverly Hills. Do not treat $243,943,527 as the CA state total. Unitemized federal gifts never carry a published city in this roll-up, so they never enter $243,943,527. State-office campaigns in California file under state law and sit outside these FEC individual-contribution aggregates. Beverly Hills is a distinct stored city from Los Angeles. Do not fold $32,500 into a Los Angeles Attorney or Investor join.
The Investments slice inside Beverly Hills
Inside Beverly Hills, receipts tagged Investments total $32,500 on 27 lines from 9 donors. That is under 0.1% of $243,943,527. About $1,204 per receipt is $32,500 divided by 27. About $3,611 per harvested donor is $32,500 divided by 9. Those ratios describe shape. They are not medians, not typical household gifts, and not salaries.
Investments is an exact employer/occupation string, not a sector roll-up. Nearby spellings, firm names, and blank employer rows are other keys. $32,500 counts only rows that stored INVESTMENTS with contributor city BEVERLY HILLS.
Repeat gifts, household pairs, and spelling variants of Investments that did not match this key never enter $32,500. Repeat gifts that did match add to 27 without necessarily adding to 9. Keep line count and donor count attached to their nouns when citing Beverly Hills.
What this join is not
It is not a ranking of Beverly Hills neighborhoods. It is not a safety comparison. It is not proof that Investments money funded a federal contract, grant, or loan. Campaign contributions and USAspending awards are different disclosure systems even when they mention the same city. This packet has no award dollars, so this page prints none.
It is not Investments nationwide unless the industry hub — a different page — is cited separately, and this packet does not harvest that nationwide integer. It is not a PAC independent-expenditure total. Motive is not a field. Party split is not a field in this packet. Missing fields stay missing.
under 0.1% is $32,500 divided by $243,943,527. Rounding the city total to $244 million does not create a second extract. Use $243,943,527 in a table. Use $244 million only as a headline form of the same integer. Correlation is not causation: two filer-entered fields meeting is not evidence that Investments “controls” Beverly Hills politics.
How to cite the Beverly Hills × Investments facts
Citation template: occupation or industry grouping Investments, contributor city Beverly Hills, CA, $32,500 on 27 itemized individual contributions from 9 donors, against a city-wide $243,943,527 on 325,245 contributions (under 0.1% of city dollars). Source: FEC.gov individual contribution aggregates indexed on LobbyVault. City labels are filer-entered.
Then send the reader to the live Beverly Hills, CA hub, the Investments industry page, California campaign finance, and All FEC ties. This prose is a packet snapshot. If a later extract disagrees, FEC.gov and the live hubs control. Do not add $32,500 to $243,943,527; the first number is already inside the second.
Using the Beverly Hills and Investments hubs together
The Beverly Hills, CA hub is the unfiltered city index: $243,943,527 on 325,245 lines. The Investments hub is the grouping without this city’s filter; this packet does not print that nationwide integer, so do not guess it from $32,500. California campaign finance is the state roll-up, a larger geography than Beverly Hills. All FEC ties is the inventory of other two-table pages. Use all four links. None of them turns $32,500 into a federal award.
If you need names, open the live city and industry hubs rather than reverse-engineering 9 donors from this snapshot. If you need cycle cuts of Beverly Hills, those are city-cycle joins, not this file. If you need Investments in a single even-year window, those are industry-cycle joins. This file stays on one city and one employer string: Beverly Hills and Investments, $32,500, 27 receipts, 9 donors.
Questions
- How much did Investments donors in Beverly Hills contribute?
- Itemized individual contributions tagged Investments and Beverly Hills, CA total $32,500 across 27 receipts from 9 donors on FEC.gov aggregates indexed here. That join is under 0.1% of Beverly Hills’s $243,943,527 city-wide book. It is not a PAC total. Original reports remain on FEC.gov.
- Is $32,500 the full Beverly Hills political-money total?
- No. Beverly Hills indexes $243,943,527 across 325,245 itemized contributions. $32,500 is only the Investments employer/occupation slice inside that city. Other strings, unitemized gifts, and state-office filings sit outside the join. Filings remain on FEC.gov.
- Does Investments money in Beverly Hills fund federal spending there?
- No. These figures are FEC individual contributions, not USAspending awards. $32,500 does not become a contract because both rows can mention Beverly Hills. Different statutes, different forms. This packet has no obligation dollars. Filings remain on FEC.gov.
- Where are the Beverly Hills and Investments live tables?
- Use the Beverly Hills, CA city hub, the Investments industry hub, California campaign finance, and All FEC ties. Original itemizations remain on FEC.gov. This guide quotes $32,500, 27 receipts, 9 donors, and $243,943,527.
FEC.gov individual contribution aggregates by donor city and employer/industry grouping. City labels are filer-entered.